Long-term results and quality of life after stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Doppler-guided HAL-RAR: a propensity score matching analysis
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the short and long-term outcomes of doppler-guided (DG) hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) using a wireless-doppler guided probe (HALO ™ Trilogy) and stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) for treatment of II-III hemorrhoids. Methods: This cohort study included patients who underwent HAL-RAR (n = 89) or SH (n = 174) for grade II-III hemorrhoids between January 2020 and December 2021. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 76 patients for each group were analyzed. Short and long-term outcomes were collected. Pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at POD1, POD 10, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. The enrolled patients completed the Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score Quality of Life (HDSS/SHS QoL) Quality of Life QoL questionnaire preoperatively and during a regular follow-up visit at 24 months after surgery. Results: Groups exhibited comparable overall postoperative complication rates (15.7% HAL-RAR/ 17.1% SH; p = 0.3843). Postoperative pain via VAS showed median scores of 4, 3, 1, 1 for HAL-RAR and 6, 4, 2, 1 for SH at POD1, POD10, 1-month, and 6-months, respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months, the recurrence rate was 10.5% in the HAL-RAR group and 9.2% in the SH group (p = 0.778801), respectively. At 24 months, 15.7% of HAL-RAR patients and 19.7% of SH patients remained symptomatic (p = 0.22313). Median post-op QoL index was 1 (HAL-RAR) and 0.92 (SH), p = 0.0365. Conclusions: HAL-RAR is a safe and feasible technique in treating grade II-III hemorrhoids showing better outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and QoL. Significance: This paper adds a new perspective in comparing the HAL-RAR and SH, focusing the attention on the patients and not surgical tecniques. A long and difficult follow-up was completed to fully understand the long-term results and the impact on the QoL of the patients that underwent these procedures.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00