Letter to the Editor: Iatrogenic breaching of the junctional zone: the unintended path to placenta accreta spectrum?

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-18 ⓘ

This letter to the editor discusses the potential role of iatrogenic breaching of the junctional zone as an unintended path leading to placenta accreta spectrum.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-18 · read from full text ⓘ

This letter to the editor proposes a hypothesis that iatrogenic breaches of the uterine junctional zone during surgical procedures may serve as an unintended pathway for the development of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. The authors argue that disruption of this anatomical barrier could facilitate abnormal placental invasion into the myometrium, thereby increasing the risk of severe obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancies. As this manuscript is a theoretical commentary without original data or patient populations, it relies on existing literature and mechanistic reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 765 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Ack

Not applicable.

Data

Not applicable as only a letter to the editor, no data used.

Fn Group

Contributors: Concept: J.H., K.D., H.V.D.M., T.V.D.B., Literature Search: K.D., Writing: J.H., K.D., H.V.D.M., T.V.D.B. Funding: No funding received. Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no competing interests. Ethical approval: Not applicable as only a letter to the editor. Informed consent: Not applicable as only a letter to the editor. Transparency: We affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported. As this is only a letter to the editor, no data are used.

Associated Data

Not applicable as only a letter to the editor, no data used.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:29:46.044917+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0