The dual burden of obesity: decoding metabolism and female reproductive endocrinology.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This review discusses how obesity disrupts the female reproductive endocrine system through interactions with hormones, inflammation, and gut microbiota, and explores potential treatment strategies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This paper is a review that examines how obesity and related metabolic disturbances connect to female reproductive endocrine dysfunction, focusing on hormonal regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and downstream menstrual and ovulatory outcomes. It synthesizes evidence on mechanistic links involving adipose-derived hormones (e.g., leptin and insulin), genetic factors (including leptin-melanocortin pathway genes and FTO), and epigenetic changes (such as DNA methylation and lncRNA alterations) that have been observed in human and rodent studies, while also discussing evolutionary frameworks like the Dual-Intervention Point hypothesis. A key limitation is that the article primarily integrates heterogeneous findings rather than presenting new empirical data, so causal strength and generalizability across populations are not definitively established. Relevance to endometriosis: the review does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The global prevalence of obesity continues to rise, posing a threat to health, especially among women, where obesity can lead to reproductive endocrine disorders. Adipose tissue interacts with endocrine hormones, including insulin, leptin, and sex hormones, resulting in functional abnormalities of the female hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis through various central and peripheral mechanisms. At the same time, systemic inflammation, intestinal microbiota, and metabolites are also implicated in these processes, further linking metabolic imbalance to reproductive endocrine dysfunction. Therefore, targeting these co-regulatory mechanisms is expected to improve metabolic disorders and reproductive endocrine dysfunction in obese women. Strategies for treating obesity include dietary and behavioral interventions, medication, surgical treatment, and traditional and alternative medical therapies, showing benefits for improving reproductive endocrine dysfunction. This review calls on clinicians to pay attention to the impact of obesity on reproductive health in women and proposes possible intervention measures.
Full text 95,415 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Intro

Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 30 kg/m 2 , while overweight is classified as a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m 2 , as per the World Health Organization (WHO). However, these thresholds may vary for different racial and regional groups. For example, for the Chinese population, overweight is defined as a BMI over 24, and obesity as a BMI over 28, whereas in Asia, overweight is classified as a BMI of 23–24.9, and obesity as a BMI of 25 or above ( Elmaleh-Sachs et al., 2023 ; Zhou and Coorperative Meta-Analysis Group Of China Obesity Task Force, 2002 ). Over the past few decades, the rate of obesity has increased alarmingly, posing a significant threat to global public health. This is evident in the prevalence, incidence, and economic burden of various major chronic diseases. Obesity contributes to at least 5% of global deaths and is a major risk factor for numerous diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cancer. Collectively, these conditions reduce life expectancy ( Liu et al., 2024 ; Loos and Yeo, 2022 ). According to the latest data from the WHO in 2022, approximately 2.5 billion adults aged 18 and above were classified as overweight, with over 890 million classified as obese. This represents 43% of adults (43% of men and 44% of women) being overweight, and 16% categorized as obese ( WHO, 2025 ). Furthermore, the obesity epidemic extends beyond adults, with over 390 million children and adolescents aged 5 to 19 being overweight, and 160 million being classified as obese ( WHO, 2025 ). Projections suggest that by 2030, the prevalence of obesity will increase by an additional 10%, exacerbating the already significant burden on global public health ( Ampofo and Boateng, 2020 ), highlighting the urgent need for effective public health interventions. In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the impact of obesity on reproductive health, particularly concerning reproductive endocrine functions. Reproductive endocrinology is concerned with the hormonal regulation of reproductive processes and the diagnosis and treatment of disorders related to reproductive hormones in both men and women. Obesity-related issues in male reproductive health include a high risk of developing hypogonadism, impaired spermatogenesis, and erectile dysfunction ( Molina-Vega et al., 2018 ). Obesity in women leads to complex interactions between adipose tissue, insulin, leptin, sex hormones, and other endocrine hormones, which can cause functional abnormalities within the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. The dysregulation of the HPO axis often initially manifests as menstrual disorders, such as irregular menstrual cycles, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and amenorrhea. If these symptoms are left untreated, they can progress to ovulatory dysfunction and infertility ( Mikhael et al., 2019 ). Despite menstrual irregularities and infertility, obesity in women is also significantly associated with other reproductive endocrine disorders, such as precocious puberty (PP) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), both of which originate from dysfunction of the HPO axis ( Santoro et al., 2004 ; Biro et al., 2010 ; Teede et al., 2021 ). Additionally, systemic chronic inflammation, intestinal microbiota, and metabolites are implicated in these processes, further linking metabolic imbalance to reproductive endocrine dysfunction. In this review, we will explore in detail the correlation and underlying mechanisms between obesity-related metabolic disorders and female reproductive endocrine dysfunction. Furthermore, we will summarize and discuss treatment strategies designed to address these obesity-related reproductive health issues, based on the identified mechanisms.

Obesity

The “International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS” emphasizes the integration of a healthy lifestyle into comprehensive PCOS management to control weight gain ( Teede et al., 2018 ). Dietary strategies, such as the Mediterranean diet (MD), emphasize the consumption of phytonutrient-dense foods, including olive oil, non-starchy vegetables, legumes, nuts, unsaturated fats, and low-fat dairy products ( Kiani et al., 2022 ). The MD has been shown to enhance success rates for IVF, improve clinical pregnancy rates, and better live birth outcomes, alongside a reduction in gestational hypertension and diabetes ( Yang et al., 2023 ). SCFAs, beneficial metabolites produced by gut microbiota during the fermentation of undigested dietary fiber, can be generated from the oligosaccharides and resistant starches present in the MD, inhibiting gastric emptying, increasing satiety, stimulating GLP-1 release, enhancing insulin sensitivity, and supporting weight loss ( Barrea et al., 2019 ). The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, which prioritizes the intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, low-fat or non-fat dairy products, fish, poultry, nuts, and seeds while limiting sodium, red meat, processed meats, and sugary beverages, has been associated with more significant weight loss in overweight or obese individuals compared to other dietary patterns, with an average weight reduction of 3.08 kg after 1 year ( Ge et al., 2020 ). The DASH diet effectively lowers fasting insulin levels, which are closely linked to lipid accumulation and reduced insulin clearance associated with obesity ( Koh et al., 2022 ). Several randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that the DASH diet can improve metabolic disorders, HA conditions, and biomarkers of oxidative stress in women with PCOS, highlighting its potential as an effective treatment modality ( Barrea et al., 2023 ). The ketogenic diet (KD), characterized by high fat, moderate protein, and low carbohydrate intake ( Barrea et al., 2023 ), has been shown to reduce postprandial insulin secretion and improve IR through weight loss. It activates AMPK and SIRT1, improving glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in PCOS ( Paoli et al., 2020 ). Additionally, decanoic acid (DA), a component of medium-chain triglyceride diet (MCT diet), has been found to lower serum free testosterone levels, reduce fasting insulin levels, and restore estrous cycles in letrozole-induced PCOS rat models ( Lee et al., 2016 ). Beyond these reproductive benefits, the metabolic improvements are linked to the modulation of gut hormones, as evidenced by research showing that MCTs/their components enhance glucose metabolism through GLP-1 secretion in both animal models and cell lines ( Nonaka et al., 2022 ). Our unpublished data suggest that the MCT diet positively affects the metabolic and reproductive outcomes of women with PCOS and DHT-induced PCOS mice, and that DA can affect the steroidogenic function of granulosa cells by directly acting on PPARγ. Several randomized controlled trials have evaluated the effects of probiotics and synbiotics in women with PCOS, showing improvements in IR, reductions in androgen levels, and positive changes in lipid profiles. By supplementing with prebiotics (such as fructooligosaccharides and inulin) and probiotics (such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli) to directly increase the number of beneficial bacteria, it has shown potential in multiple clinical trials to improve metabolic and endocrine indicators in PCOS ( Martinez Guevara et al., 2024 ). In addition to these dietary patterns, single dietary approaches such as high-protein, low-calorie, and low-glycemic-index diets have also demonstrated efficacy in weight management ( Juhász et al., 2024 ). Behavioral interventions particularly physical exercise, have shown potential in improving fertility and reducing pregnancy complications by restoring ovulation ( Schenkelaars et al., 2021 ). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which included 89 trials on behavior-based weight loss and weight maintenance, indicated that behavioral interventions alone may not produce clinically significant weight control, although they can improve quality of life ( LeBlanc et al., 2018 ). Previous studies suggest that while exercise can reduce weight and improve IR in PCOS patients, dietary interventions often yield more substantial results ( Jungari et al., 2023 ). Compared with dietary interventions, higher adherence and individualization are more challenging to achieve with behavioral interventions, which may explain the suboptimal effectiveness of behavioral interventions. However, we place more emphasis on combining dietary and behavioral interventions. At present, therapeutic approaches targeting intestinal flora and its metabolites, such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and FMT, have made significant progress in the treatment of obesity and related metabolic diseases. These methods aim to influence host metabolism and improve disease states by modulating the composition and function of gut microbiota ( Gao et al., 2024 ). Probiotics are live microbes that benefit the host when consumed in sufficient quantities ( Ku et al., 2024 ). Common probiotics, such as lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria,can regulate the composition of intestinal flora, enhance intestinal barrier function, and produce beneficial metabolites such as SCFAs, thereby affecting host energy metabolism, inflammatory response and improving IR ( Borgonovi et al., 2022 ; Lin et al., 2022 ). Prebiotic is a food component that can not be digested and absorbed by the host but can selectively promote the growth and activity of beneficial microorganisms in the intestinal tract. Common prebiotics include inulin, fructooligosaccharides, resistant starch, and galactooligosaccharides. By promoting the proliferation of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus , prebiotics can improve gut microbiota composition, reduce energy intake, reduce oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and improve insulin resistance, thereby reducing the risk of CVD, diabetes and hypertension and indirectly improve metabolic health ( Borgonovi et al., 2022 ; Jacquier et al., 2024 ). Synbiotics are a combination of probiotics and prebiotics that work together to enhance the survival and activity of probiotics in the gut, resulting in more significant health benefits ( Al-Habsi et al., 2024 ). FMT is the transfer of a healthy donor’s fecal microbiota into a patient’s gut to restore a healthy intestinal microecosystem. It can correct intestinal flora imbalance, restore microbial diversity, increase SCFA production, improve intestinal barrier function, and reduce bacterial translocation and systemic inflammation, thereby having a positive impact on metabolic health ( Hatton et al., 2020 ). The research on the treatments targeting intestinal microecology in female reproductive endocrine related diseases are still in their infancy, mainly focusing on the study of PCOS. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that probiotic supplements may improve insulin resistance, blood glucose and lipid levels in PCOS patients ( Martinez Guevara et al., 2024 ; Angoorani et al., 2023 ). Probiotics such as Lactobacillus reuteri, for example, have been found to reduce weight, reduce IR and improve fertility in PCOS patients ( Basnet et al., 2024 ). Experimental studies have found that supplement of E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) can improve mitochondrial damage of granular cells in PCOS mice by promoting the production of intestinal immune factor IL-22 ( Luo et al., 2023 ). Probiotic supplementation can reduce circulating androgen levels and improve hyperandrogenemia in PCOS individuals. It also increases intestinal microbial diversity, inhibits the growth of harmful bacteria, thereby reducing inflammatory levels in PCOS patients by enhancing intestinal barrier function and decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines ( Artyomenko et al., 2023 ; Zhang H. et al., 2023 ). As a prebiotic, inulin regulates gut microbiota to significantly improve hyperandrogenemia and glucose-lipid metabolism in PCOS patients and model mice ( Geng et al., 2025 ). It enhances the production of butyrate by gut bacteria, thereby improving insulin sensitivity in PCOS patients ( Geng et al., 2025 ). Synbiotics may be more effective than using probiotics or prebiotics alone in improving clinical symptoms and metabolic indicators of PCOS ( Martinez Guevara et al., 2024 ). In addition, transferring fecal microbiota from PCOS patients to germ-free mice leads to metabolic disorders and ovarian dysfunction in recipient mice, strongly demonstrating the direct role of gut microbiota in PCOS pathogenesis. Conversely, transplanting fecal microbiota from healthy donors to PCOS model animals shows promise in improving metabolic abnormalities and reproductive endocrine functions, indicating a potent theraputic value of FMT in treatment of PCOS ( Huang F. et al., 2024 ). The FDA has approved several long-term weight-loss medications, including orlistat, phentermine/topiramate extended-release, naltrexone/bupropion extended-release, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Clinical studies have demonstrated that these pharmacotherapies can achieve weight reductions ranging from 3.07 kg to 9.77 kg ( Singh and Singh, 2020 ). Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, has been shown to improve ovulation rates in PCOS patients when used in combination with oral contraceptives compared to oral contraceptives alone ( Legro et al., 2015 ). Both liraglutide and semaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, are effective for weight management and have potential as treatments for obese patients with PCOS ( Austregésilo de Athayde De Hollanda Morais et al., 2024 ). GLP-1 agonists exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties in the ovaries and endometrium, increases insulin sensitivity, delays gastric emptying, and enhances satiety, while also improving menstrual regularity in PCOS, reducing serum free testosterone levels, and decreasing ovarian stromal volume ( Nylander et al., 2017 ). Metformin, a well-established insulin sensitizer with a long-term safety profile, is also employed for weight management. Its efficacy is not only observed in short-term studies (showing a 2%–7% reduction) but is particularly notable for long-term maintenance. Evidence from the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) demonstrated that individuals on metformin who achieved initial weight loss maintained a mean loss of 6.2% over 15 years ( Apolzan et al., 2019 ; Day et al., 2019 ). Evidence-based guidelines recommend metformin for weight loss and the management of endocrine-metabolic disorders ( Legro et al., 2013 ). Metformin can significantly and sustainably alter gut microbiota composition, such as increasing E. coli and R. torques while reducing I. bartlettii and R. intestinalis. Additionally, metformin significantly changed 62 microbial functional pathways, including acetate production and glucose metabolism, and increased serum SCFAs (butyrate, acetate, valerate) ( Mueller et al., 2021 ). Pharmacotherapy should be re-evaluated after 3–4 months, with discontinuation considered if weight loss is less than 4%–5%. Bariatric surgery, including Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), is effective not only in achieving weight loss but also in directly improving reproductive health in obese women ( Ciangura et al., 2019 ). SG and RYGB are the most common procedures, accounting for 61% and 17% of all bariatric surgeries, respectively ( Arterburn et al., 2020 ). Among bariatric surgery patients, women of childbearing age represent approximately 49%, highlighting the importance of weight control in this population ( Ciangura et al., 2019 ). Compared to obese women who did not undergo surgery, those who did show improved pregnancy outcomes, including reduced risks of gestational diabetes ( Brüning et al., 2000 ; Kawai et al., 2021 ), preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and better neonatal outcomes, such as lower incidences of low birth weight and macrosomia ( Maggard et al., 2008 ). Bariatric surgery is highly effective in promoting weight loss, restoring menstrual cycles, reducing serum androgen levels, and providing metabolic benefits ( Escobar-Morreale et al., 2005 ; Singh et al., 2020 ). For instance, a prospective study of Indian women with PCOS demonstrated a 63% excess weight loss at 1 year, accompanied by a significant drop in serum testosterone and the restoration of normal menstrual cycles in all patients within 3 months, thereby validating its comprehensive efficacy ( Singh et al., 2020 ). A cross-sectional study of 515 obese women (BMI 42.2 ± 7.5 kg/m 2 ) who underwent gastric banding or gastric bypass surgery, with an average weight loss of 35.3 ± 17.9 kg, revealed a reduction in the proportion of women with irregular menstrual cycles (>35 days) from 38% to 25% ( Różańska-Walędziak et al., 2020 ). Typically, normal menstrual cycles resume 3 months post-surgery ( Bilenka et al., 1995 ), with weight stabilizing within 1–2 years. A comprehensive review demonstrates that this metabolic transformation is highly beneficial for female reproductive health, leading to the normalization of reproductive hormones, improved fertility, and a decreased risk of miscarriage ( Merhi, 2009 ). The 2019 clinical practice guidelines on perioperative nutrition, metabolism, and non-surgical support for bariatric surgery patients recommend postponing pregnancy until 12–18 months after surgery to prevent nutritional deficiencies in the fetus due to rapid maternal weight loss ( Mechanick et al., 2019 ). Bariatric surgery may alter ghrelin release levels, a key regulator of both obesity and reproduction, due to structural changes in the stomach. Post-surgery, ghrelin levels remain reduced for over a year, further influencing metabolism and reproductive health ( Jacobsen et al., 2012 ; Sundbom et al., 2007 ). Emerging research indicates that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), along with practices such as tai chi and yoga, can effectively address reproductive endocrine disorders ( Ye et al., 2022 ). Polysaccharides, important active compounds in many TCMs, are recognized for their prebiotic activity and contributions to disease prevention and treatment. Polysaccharides derived from Cordyceps sinensis and Ganoderma lucidum have been shown to inhibit weight gain and fat accumulation in HFD obese mice ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). Additionally, Polysaccharides from lycium barbarum and schisandra have been observed to increase SCFA content and modulate the expression of inflammatory factors, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects ( Chen et al., 2019 ; Qi Y. et al., 2019 ). Moreover, Codonopsis pilosula polysaccharides exhibit antioxidant properties through the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, leading to improved IR in a high-fat, high-sucrose diet obese mice model ( Zhang et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, polysaccharides from other traditional Chinese medicines, including Codonopsis , Ginseng , Cistanche , and Ophiopogon , have been shown to restore gut microbiota balance and elevate SCFA levels, contributing to anti-inflammatory and anti-obesity effects ( Cao et al., 2022 ; Fu et al., 2020 ; Li S. et al., 2019 ; Wang et al., 2019 ). Similarly, resveratrol from Polygonum cuspidatum , as well as polysaccharides and saponins from Gynostemma pentaphyllum , also display prebiotic properties ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). In addition to influencing the gut microbiota, TCM may also impact the gut structure to exert control over BW Studies have demonstrated that puerarin, a compound found in Pueraria lobata, can inhibit the activity of dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV) neurons by binding to the GABA type A receptor subunit alpha1 (GABRA1). Downregulation of Ezrin, CDC42, Eps8, and Villin 1, which are crucial for maintaining intestinal microvilli length. Consequently, leading to a reduction in its length, which in turn suppresses fat absorption and controls weight ( Lyu et al., 2024 ). Berberine has been demonstrated to improve insulin sensitivity and IR. Evidence from a dehydroepiandrosterone-induced PCOS rat model indicates that its insulin-sensitizing effects are concomitant with the downregulation of key pro-inflammatory markers (TLR4, NF-κB, TNF-α) and apoptosis-related proteins (caspase-3), suggesting that berberine alleviates IR, at least in part, through anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic mechanisms ( Shen et al., 2021 ), Furthermore, berberine is capable of regulating dyslipidemia and reducing androgen levels, as well as the LH/FSH ratio ( Xie et al., 2019 ). Additionally, berberine facilitates ovulation by modulating the expression of LHCGR and CYP19A1 genes in granulosa cells, which are crucial for the development of female gonads. Specifically, in PCOS, berberine can enhance ER by upregulating the expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 3 (LPAR3) and integrin αvβ3 proteins in endometrial tissue ( Wang et al., 2021 ). These studies suggest that TCM often plays a systemic regulatory role. Systemic intervention methods are the current direction of treatment research for chronic diseases such as obesity. Therefore, TCM still has a vast space for further research ( Lyu et al., 2024 ). The advantages and limitations is shown in Table 2 . The advantages and Limitations of each treatment. MD: mediterranean diet, DASH: dietary approaches to stop hypertension, KD: ketogenic diet, MCT: Medium-Chain Triglyceride, FMT: fecal microbiota transplantation, FOS: fructooligosaccharides, IBS: irritable bowel syndrome, FODMAP: fermentable oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols, SCFAs: Short-Chain Fatty Acids, GLP-1: Glucagon-like Peptide-1, RYGB: Roux-en-Y, gastric bypass, SG: sleeve gastrectomy, FMT: fecal microbiota transplantation, TCM: traditional chinese medicine, IVF: in vitro fertilization, PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome, PPARγ: Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma, IR: insulin resistance.

Mechanism

Obesity affects reproductive health by disrupting the HPO axis. Kiss1 neurons located in the hypothalamus, responsible for producing kisspeptin, are crucial in regulating the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the release of gonadotropins. Kiss1 neurons function as metabolic sensors, linking energy balance to reproductive functions ( Navarro, 2020 ). There are two distinct populations of kiss1 neurons, including those located in ARC (Kiss1 ARC ) and those in anteroventral periventricular/periventricular nucleus (Kiss1 AVPV/PeN ) of the hypothalamus. Ovarian steroids differentially regulate them. For instance, estradiol (E2) upregulates the production of kisspeptin in Kiss1 AVPV/PeN neurons while downregulating it in Kiss1 ARC neurons ( Uenoyama et al., 2021 ). Additionally, Kiss1 ARC neurons co-express glutamate, while Kiss1 AVPV/PeN neurons co-express gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), with both neurotransmitters being upregulated by E2 in females. Furthermore, Kiss1 ARC neurons co-express receptors for leptin and insulin, and are activated by these hormones in a state of satiety. Kiss1 ARC neurons also stimulate anorexigenic POMC neurons while inhibiting orexigenic neuropeptide Y (NPY)/agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons, linking feeding behavior to reproductive functions ( Navarro, 2020 ). Both Kiss1 ARC and Kiss1 AVPV/PeN neurons project to the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVH) neurons involved in satiety and the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) neurons responsible for regulating energy expenditure, modulating their functions through the release of glutamate and GABA, with an upregulation by E2 in females ( Figure 1 ; Rønnekleiv et al., 2022 ). Dual regulatory mechanism on reproduction and metabolism. The hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons are expressed in ARC and AVPV/PeN regions, releasing kisspeptin to influence GnRH neurons. Kisspeptin neurons project to POMC and NPY/AgRP neurons and co-express glutamate in the ARC region and GABA in the AVPV/PeN region, thus regulating appetite and metabolism. POMC and NPY/AgRP neurons also interact with kisspeptin neurons, establishing a neural mechanism that integrates metabolic processes with reproductive function. ARC: arcuate nucleus, AVPV/PeN: anteroventral periventricular nucleus/periventricular nucleus, GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone, POMC: pro-opiomelanocortin, NPY/AgRP: neuropeptide Y/agouti-related peptide, PVH: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, DMH: dorsomedial hypothalamus, nNOS: neuronal nitric oxide synthase, NO: nitric oxide, LH: luteinizing hormone, E2: estradiol, T: testosterone. As a consequence of Kiss1 neuron dysfunction, obesity significantly affects GnRH-LH release patterns in females. Compared to women of normal weight, obese women exhibit significantly lower average LH levels when measured every 10 min over 12 h, with an exceedance of a 50% reduction in LH pulse amplitude during the follicular phase ( Jain et al., 2007 ). This reduction results in inadequate corpus luteum formation and lower progesterone (P) production by the ovaries. Although obese women with lower follicular phase LH levels have similar serum E2 levels compared to non-obese women, obese women during ovulation exhibit a reduced LH surge, resulting in inadequate corpus luteum formation and lower mid-luteal P production (luteal phase deficiency) ( Jain et al., 2007 ). While increased GnRH/LH pulse frequency is observed in obese individuals and those with PCOS, obesity primarily affects LH pulse amplitude rather than frequency, leading to an overall decrease in mean LH levels ( Morales et al., 1996 ). In women with oligomenorrhea and anovulatory PCOS, both mean LH levels and LH pulse amplitude negatively correlate with BMI, further suggesting that obesity-induced metabolic changes contribute to reproductive endocrine dysfunction ( Taylor et al., 1997 ). In women with obesity, metabolic imbalances such as IR and increased adiposity alter the function of these hypothalamic neurons, leading to disrupted reproductive signaling. IR can impair hypothalamic insulin responsiveness, a phenomenon known as “brain IR” ( Milstein and Ferris, 2021 ). Exposure to an HFD impairs ARC neurons, contributing to neuronal fibrosis, reduced insulin receptor activation in these hypothalamic neurons, and worsening brain IR ( Beddows et al., 2024 ). Disruption of insulin signaling in neurons leads to reproductive dysfunction, such as reduced LH levels and infertility, as demonstrated by studies where InsR (insulin receptor) knockout in neural stem cells during early brain development is mediated by Nestin-Cre ( Brüning et al., 2000 ). However, in models with widespread deletion of InsR in the brain, the pituitary’s responsiveness remains normal, indicating that the impact on LH levels may result from dysregulation of hypothalamic GnRH production rather than a direct pituitary defect ( Brüning et al., 2000 ), thereby supporting the hypothesis that the hypothalamus is a key brain region for insulin’s action ( Milstein and Ferris, 2021 ). Insulin has been shown to affect reproductive function by directly modulating LH secretion. For example, injection of insulin into the lateral ventricle of insulin-deficient diabetic sheep and rats increases both the frequency and peak levels of LH pulses ( Kovacs et al., 2002 ; Tanaka et al., 2000 ). However, insulin’s effects on GnRH production may be indirect, as conditional knockout of InsR in GnRH neurons does not affect puberty onset, estrous cycles, or litter size in female mice ( Divall et al., 2010 ). This suggests that insulin may regulate reproductive function through other neural circuits. One such circuit involves kiss1 neurons, which are crucial for initiating the secretion of GnRH. Although only a subset of kiss1 neurons in female mice express InsR—approximately 22% in the ARC and 3%–5% in the periventricular region—insulin signaling in these neurons is critical for reproductive health ( Qiu et al., 2013 ). Specific knockout of InsR in kiss1 neurons results in reduced LH levels and delayed puberty onset in female mice, although fertility and estrous cycles remain unaffected ( Qiu et al., 2013 ). Interestingly, when IGF-1 receptors are also knocked out in kiss1 neurons, a reduction in litter size is observed, suggesting that insulin and IGF-1 signaling cooperate in these neurons to regulate reproductive function ( Wang M. et al., 2024 ). Interestingly, the crosstalk between IR and steroid hormone imbalance is also a key mechanism causing HPO axis dysfunction. In obese individuals, elevated insulin levels promote androgen production, which is then converted into additional estrogen by aromatase in adipocytes ( Cirillo et al., 2008 ). Excess estrogen reduces LH production through negative feedback on the HPO axis, further impairing reproductive function. A study supporting this finding shows that aromatase inhibitors significantly increase LH pulse amplitude by 2.54-fold in obese women, a response not observed in women of normal weight ( Venkatesh et al., 2022 ). Leptin resistance (LR) is another characteristic feature of obesity, accompanied by elevated serum leptin levels ( Izquierdo et al., 2019 ). The hypothalamus serves as the central target for leptin in regulating feeding, energy metabolism and reproductive functions. Although leptin overexpression accelerates puberty onset and enhances reproductive capacity in young female mice, prolonged hyperleptinemia eventually leads to hypothalamic hypogonadism characterized by prolonged estrous cycles, ovarian atrophy and impaired GnRH and LH secretion ( Yura et al., 2000 ). Leptin primarily exerts its effects through two types of neurons in the ARC of the hypothalamus: POMC and NPY/AgRP neurons. These neurons have opposing roles in regulating appetite and energy metabolism. POMC neurons release α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), which acts on melanocortin receptors (MC3R and MC4R) in the hypothalamic preoptic area to produce anorexigenic effects. In contrast, NPY/AgRP neurons inhibit POMC activity by secreting AgRP, NPY, and GABA, counteracting the anorexigenic effect of POMC ( Cowley et al., 2001 ; Schwartz et al., 1996 ; Stephens et al., 1995 ). Both POMC and NPY/AgRP neurons are interconnected with kisspeptin neurons, establishing a neurobiological link between metabolic regulation and reproduction. NPY/AgRP neurons inhibit kisspeptin neurons in the ARC and AVPV/PeN region of the hypothalamus, thereby reducing kisspeptin production and subsequently decreasing GnRH and LH secretion ( Coutinho et al., 2020 ; Padilla et al., 2017 ). Conversely, POMC neurons activate Kiss1 ARC neurons, thereby promoting the release of GnRH and LH ( Israel et al., 2012 ). Notably, kisspeptin and GnRH neurons either do not express LepR or express them at very low levels, suggesting that leptin likely influences the HPO axis predominantly through its effects on POMC and NPY/AgRP neurons ( Louis et al., 2011 ; Figure 1 ). Experimental studies have shown that knockout of LepR specifically in AgRP neurons results in reduced LH production, arrested estrous cycles, and decreased fertility in female mice ( Egan et al., 2017 ). These studies highlight the crucial role of NPY/AgRP neurons in mediating leptin’s impact on reproduction. Furthermore, hypothalamic nitric oxide (NO) neurons, which also express LepR, appear to play a role in leptin’s central regulation of the HPO axis. Approximately 20% of LepR-expressing neurons in the hypothalamus also produce NO via neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). Knockout of LepR in these NO neurons results in hyperphagic obesity, reduced energy expenditure, and hyperglycemia similar to what is observed in global LepR-deficient mice ( Leshan et al., 2012 ). On the other hand, NO, as a lipophilic gaseous molecule that senses leptin signals in the brain, can freely diffuse and act on neighboring neurons (such as GnRH neurons), regulating their pulsatile secretion activity. By knocking out the nNOS gene (nNOS −/− ) or pharmacologically inhibiting the activity of nNOS in the hypothalamic preoptic area, the promoting effect of exogenous leptin on LH secretion is significantly weakened, and leptin cannot restore the fertility of leptin-deficient female mice, proving that the nNOS/NO pathway is a necessary condition for leptin to regulate reproduction ( Bellefontaine et al., 2014 ). Mechanistically, NO may directly activate the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cGMP pathway in GnRH neurons, modulating their excitability, or regulate the preoptic local neural circuitry (including Kisspeptin neurons or GABA/glutamatergic interneurons), indirectly controlling the GnRH pulse generator ( Bellefontaine et al., 2014 ). In summary, LR and excess leptin disrupt the functions of intermediate neurons, such as POMC, NPY/AgRP, and nNOS neurons. Through pathways including leptin-melanocortin-kisspeptin, leptin-NPY/AgRP-kisspeptin and leptin-nNOS/NO-kisspeptin, leptin influences both energy metabolism and GnRH release by modulating hypothalamic kisspeptin-producing neurons ( Padilla et al., 2017 ; Leshan et al., 2012 ; Constantin et al., 2021 ; Hessler et al., 2020 ; Hill et al., 2010 ). Kisspeptin is thus considered a crucial link between leptin signaling and GnRH secretion, as well as a key integrator of metabolic energy homeostasis and reproductive function ( Figure 1 ). In individuals with obesity, inflammation is primarily driven by increased levels of inflammatory markers and activated signaling pathways, which contribute to systemic organ dysfunction ( Cox et al., 2015 ). Obesity and prolonged HFD exposure result in chronic systemic inflammation, which significantly disrupts hypothalamic function and impairs reproductive endocrine function, indicating the hypothalamus is particularly vulnerable to obesity-induced inflammation ( Sewaybricker et al., 2023 ). In the context of obesity, macrophages play a crucial role in driving systemic inflammation. These immune cells are abundant in adipose tissue, particularly visceral fat, and release inflammatory cytokines and other mediators that promote both peripheral and central inflammation ( Weisberg et al., 2003 ). Although the blood-brain barrier (BBB) traditionally protects the brain from direct infiltration by peripheral immune cells, evidence suggests that macrophages from adipose tissue can infiltrate into the hypothalamus during obesity, thereby contributing to local inflammation ( Valdearcos et al., 2017 ). Despite the involvement of peripheral macrophages, resident central nervous system (CNS) immune cells, particularly microglia, appear to have a more prominent role in maintaining chronic hypothalamic inflammation. In obesity, hypothalamic microglia are activated by elevated circulating saturated fatty acids via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4)/NF-κB signaling pathway, leading to the polarization of microglia into a pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage-like phenotype, which exacerbates local inflammation in the hypothalamus ( Lively and Schlichter, 2018 ). Recent studies have shown that depleting or inhibiting microglial activation can reduce BW, food intake, and peripheral macrophage infiltration, highlighting the close interaction between peripheral and central immune cells in sustaining hypothalamic inflammation ( Valdearcos et al., 2017 ). Astrocytes, another type of glial cell, also play a crucial role in hypothalamic inflammation. Under conditions such as autoimmune encephalopathy, brain injury, or microbial infections, astrocytes are activated and produce a range of inflammatory factors via the cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2)-NF-κB signaling pathway. Activated astrocytes release various inflammatory factors, including TNF, ILs, chemokine ligands, and colony-stimulating factors, which interact with microglia, oligodendrocytes, and neurons, influencing brain pathology and recovery ( Linnerbauer et al., 2020 ). Disruption of NF-κB signaling in astrocytes has been shown to ameliorate HFD-induced hypothalamic inflammation, reduce weight gain, and improve glucose tolerance, highlighting the importance of astrocytic regulation in hypothalamic responses to obesity ( Figure 2 ; Douglass et al., 2017 ). Obesity induces dysfunction in GnRH neurons mediated by hypothalamic inflammatory pathways. Macrophages in visceral adipose tissue are a key source of inflammatory factors, influencing microglia and astrocytes and releasing inflammatory factors, thereby impacting GnRH neurons and the ovarian microenvironment (oocyte meiosis, mitochondrial function, and angiogenesis). Hypothalamic inflammation caused by obesity and HFD has profound consequences for reproductive health, which is commonly associated with menstrual irregularities and ovulatory dysfunction, such as those observed in PCOS ( Barlampa et al., 2021 ). GnRH neurons express receptors for various inflammatory mediators, including interleukins, prostaglandins (PGEs), and TNF-α, suggesting that these neurons are directly regulated by inflammatory factors ( Jasoni et al., 2005 ). For instance, IL-10 knockout results in impaired GnRH secretion and loss of estrous cycles ( Barabás et al., 2018 ). In addition to these direct effects, inflammatory factors such as TNF-α and bacterial endotoxins, like lipopolysaccharide (LPS), can also indirectly influence kisspeptin neurons in the hypothalamus, thereby impairing GnRH secretion and further contributing to reproductive dysfunction ( Lee et al., 2019 ; Sarchielli et al., 2017 ). The interplay between inflammation, kisspeptin neurons, and GnRH release highlights that inflammation can disrupt both the neural networks regulating reproductive hormone release and the feedback mechanisms necessary for normal reproductive function. The ovaries are the primary organs responsible for producing oocytes and hormones, such as E2 and P, which are crucial to reproductive health. Ovarian function directly determines reproductive potential. Although the ovaries can still function to some extent in the absence of hypothalamic and pituitary function, obesity disrupts ovarian processes, directly impairing follicle development and oocyte quality. Oocyte meiosis is a critical process for oocyte maturation and successful fertilization. Oocytes are temporarily arrested at metaphase I of meiosis, during which the nuclear envelope remains intact, and are referred to as germinal vesicle (GV) stage oocytes. The resumption of meiosis involves the breakdown of the germinal vesicle (GVBD) and the first meiotic division, leading to spindle reorganization and ultimately, fertilization ( Pan and Li, 2019 ). Spindle formation is critical for the completion of meiosis and oocyte maturation. In HFD-induced obese mice, oocytes exhibit reduced GVBD rates, abnormal spindle morphology, chromosome misalignment, and disrupted oocyte polarization, which contribute to increased rates of aneuploidy ( Figure 2 ; Hou et al., 2016 ). Similarly, obese women undergoing IVF exhibit a higher incidence of spindle abnormalities and chromosomal misalignments in oocytes, leading to impaired oocyte maturation ( Gonzalez et al., 2022 ; Machtinger et al., 2012 ). Furthermore, studies have shown that obesity alters gene expression in oocytes, upregulating CXCL2 and DUSP1, while downregulating TWIST1, ID3, GAS7, and TXNIP. These genes are involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, and lipid metabolism ( Ruebel et al., 2017 ). These findings suggest that obesity impairs oocyte maturation and quality through both genetic and epigenetic alterations, including changes in DNA methylation and histone acetylation, which negatively affect chromatin stability during meiosis ( Hou et al., 2016 ; Yun et al., 2019 ). Mitochondria are crucial for oocyte quality, as they provide the energy needed for oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development ( Bahety et al., 2024 ). Oocyte quality is closely associated with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number and mitochondrial function. Primary oocytes exhibit substantial mtDNA expansion during early maturation, and oocytes with higher mtDNA copy numbers have a greater likelihood of fertilization success ( Cao et al., 2007 ; Reynier et al., 2001 ). Additionally, Mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production are also critical for oocyte quality ( Figure 2 ; Acton et al., 2004 ). In obese female mice, oocytes exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction, including reduced mtDNA copy number, increased mtDNA mutations, impaired mitochondrial membrane potential, and elevated autophagy levels ( Wu et al., 2015 ). Furthermore, oocytes from obese mice have diminished mitochondrial density, inhibited mitochondrial membrane potential, and accumulation of abnormal mitochondrial aggregates ( Chen et al., 2024 ). Moreover, mature oocytes from obese mice show reduced mtDNA and increased mitochondrial single-nucleotide variant (mtSNV) rates, impairing mitochondrial energy function and oocyte quality ( Chen et al., 2024 ). Obesity-induced damage to oocyte mitochondria may be related to the inhibition of AMPK activity, leading to increased binding affinity of the ATF5-POLG protein complex to the mutated mtDNA D-loop and protein-coding regions, thereby causing the replication of heteroplasmic mtDNA ( Chen et al., 2024 ). Interestingly, mitochondrial damage in oocytes from obese mothers may also affect offspring, passing down metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunction across generations ( Elías-López et al., 2023 ). Granulosa cells, essential components of follicles, produce estrogen and play a vital role in oocyte differentiation and ovulation. In both individuals with obesity and PCOS, granulosa cells exhibit reduced proliferation, increased apoptosis, and impaired steroidogenesis, negatively affecting follicle maturation and oocyte quality ( Nteeba et al., 2014 ; Peng et al., 2021 ). These abnormalities are often accompanied by elevated oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased ATP levels, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and autophagy dysfunction in granulosa cells ( Zhao et al., 2023 ). Obesity-induced lipotoxicity and metabolic dysfunction in granulosa cells contribute to these impairments, reducing female fertility ( Hua et al., 2020 ). Additionally, certain non-coding RNAs, such as miR-133a, play a role in obesity-induced granulosa cell apoptosis, targeting typical anti-apoptotic genes, including C1QL1 and XIAP, and pro-apoptotic genes, such as PTEN ( Chen et al., 2023 ). Studies have also revealed that obesity affects granulosa cells at various stages of follicle development. For example, in obese mice, excessive proliferation of granulosa cells in primordial follicles accelerates follicular depletion, mimicking PCOS-like ovarian phenotypes and reducing ovarian reserve ( Zhou et al., 2023 ). This study employed laser capture microdissection and RNA sequencing to dissect and analyze primordial and primary follicles at various developmental stages, aiming to identify gene expression changes during the transition from primordial to primary follicles (PFT). The results showed significant increases in ferroptosis, oxidative stress, vascular endothelial growth factor, and mTOR signaling markers in primordial follicles from obese mice, suggesting that increased lipid metabolism-related ferroptosis in obesity may be a key mechanism for excessive activation of primordial follicles ( Zhou et al., 2023 ). Recent single-cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies have found that in both diet-induced and leptin-deficient obese mice, the granulosa cell subtype expressing inhibin B increases, and pseudo-temporal analysis has shown that this granulosa cell subtype is mainly distributed in more mature antral follicles. Moreover, obesity induces a shift in granulosa cell subtypes, contributing to follicular arrest and impaired follicle maturation, which is further influenced by altered androgen production by theca cells in obese ovaries ( Long et al., 2022 ; Salilew-Wondim et al., 2015 ). The ovarian microenvironment (OME), comprising follicular fluid, stroma, vasculature, and immune cells, plays a crucial role in regulating ovarian functions, including follicular development, hormone production, and oocyte maturation ( Duffy et al., 2019 ; Shen et al., 2023 ). Chronic low-grade inflammation in the ovarian microenvironment is a key factor contributing to follicular dysfunction in obesity. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNFα, IL-6, IL-8) and oxidative stress markers in the ovaries of obese individuals disrupt normal ovarian function and accelerate ovarian aging ( Snider and Wood, 2019 ; Xiong et al., 2011 ). The excessive pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1, IL-6, TNFα, and CRP) and oxidative stress factors (H2O2, oxLDL) in the ovarian tissue and follicular fluid of obese individuals may be produced by follicular cells and immune cells within the ovary ( Ruebel et al., 2017 ; Nteeba et al., 2014 ) or be associated with elevated circulating inflammatory factors in obese individuals ( Figure 3 ). Therefore, systemic inflammation in obese individuals can be transmitted to the ovaries and even the follicular fluid, thereby affecting ovarian function. IR and HA constitute the pathophysiological basis of metabolic and reproductive disorders in PCOS. IR and hyperinsulinemia increase free testosterone by inhibiting SHBG production, acting on InsR in theca cells or enhancing IGF-1 stimulation, which increases androgen secretion. Additionally, central actions increase LH secretion. Excessive androgens activate PI3K/AKT, MAPK, PTEN, and downregulate WNT signaling pathways, leading to increased GC proliferation, reduced differentiation, follicular arrest, and polycystic ovary formation. Androgens can also suppress IFN-γ expression and promote apoptosis in GCs. At the same time, excess androgens can exacerbate abdominal obesity, IR, and systemic inflammation. SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin, IR: insulin resistance, InsR: Insulin Receptor, IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor 1, LH: Luteinizing Hormone, PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome, AR: androgen receptor, IGFBP: insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins, GC: granulosa cell. Obesity also leads to dysregulation of ovarian angiogenesis, which is essential for supplying nutrients and oxygen to developing follicles. During early development, small follicles lack their own vascular network and rely on stromal vessels for nutrients and oxygen. As follicles mature, each creates its own vascular network within the theca layer, ensuring an independent supply of nutrients and oxygen separate from other follicles. Alterations in angiogenesis can lead to the formation of abnormal vascular structures, which can negatively impact follicle development and ovulation ( Duncan and Nio-Kobayashi, 2013 ). In addition to chronic inflammation, dysregulation of angiogenesis has also been observed in the ovaries of obese and PCOS individuals ( Di Pietro et al., 2018 ). For example, increased neovascularization and an imbalance of pro/antiangiogenic factors are present in the ovarian stroma of PCOS, and this dysregulation of angiogenesis is thought to contribute to the characteristic ovarian features of PCOS, such as abnormal follicular development, increased numbers of small follicles, failure of dominant follicle selection, anovulation, and the formation of follicular cysts ( Di Pietro et al., 2018 ). Angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), not only stimulate vascular formation but also directly affect theca cells or granulosa cells, influencing follicular development and their endocrine function ( Irusta et al., 2010 ). In high-fat and fructose diet-induced obese mice, early ovarian follicle accumulation and reduced numbers of mature follicles and corpora lutea are accompanied by a decrease in the number of microvessels in early follicles. This phenotype may be related to the excessive expression of IL-10 in the periovarian adipose tissue during obesity, which disrupts the function of VEGF and contributes to ovarian aging. This effect can be mitigated by treatments such as metformin ( Yang et al., 2021 ). Recent single-cell and spatial transcriptomic sequencing studies have provided high-resolution cellular maps of the impact of obesity on the ovarian microenvironment. The study found that genetic obesity of OB/OB mice, but not HFD-induced obesity, significantly altered the proportions of granulosa cells, theca-stroma cells, luteal cells, and vascular endothelial cells in the ovary. Obesity severely disrupted granulosa cell differentiation from small to large follicles. Functionally, HFD enhanced FSH sensitivity and related hormone production, whereas OB/OB mice had decreased FSH sensitivity, insufficient steroid hormone production, and impaired follicular development. These differences can be attributed to the distinct expression patterns of the transcription factor Foxo1 in the two types of obese mice ( Jiang et al., 2024 ). In animal experiments, the effects of obesity on ovarian reserve function have shown variability. In diet-induced obesity (e.g., high-fat and high-carbohydrate diets) in rodents, rapid depletion of ovarian reserves has been observed ( Wang et al., 2014 ). Similar findings have been reported in rabbit studies ( Díaz-Hernández et al., 2022 ). Conversely, caloric restriction or maintaining optimal nutrition can reduce primordial follicle activation, increase the number of quiescent primordial follicles, prolong reproductive lifespan, and delay the onset of menopause ( Garcia et al., 2019 ). Compared to caloric-restricted rats, diet-induced obese rats exhibit mTOR-related signaling associated with aging, along with decreased expression of anti-aging molecules such as SIRT1, SIRT6, FOXO3a, and NRF-1 ( Wang et al., 2014 ). Enhanced mTOR signaling is also associated with the overactivation and depletion of primordial follicles, suggesting that obesity may accelerate ovarian reserve depletion by excessively activating mTOR pathways ( Guo and Yu, 2019 ). These findings align with the conclusions drawn from studies using laser capture microdissection and RNA sequencing to investigate the characteristics of the primordial to primary follicle transition in obese mice, which suggest that obesity may accelerate primordial follicle pool depletion and decline in ovarian reserve function through excessive activation of mTOR signaling ( Zhou et al., 2023 ). In OB/OB mice, despite increased follicular atresia, reduced numbers of pre-ovulatory follicles (large antral follicles), and a significant decrease in the number of corpora lutea, the expression of markers related to ovarian reserve, including Dazl, Stra8, and ZP3 mRNA, are increased. Additionally, the count of primordial follicles is also elevated, suggesting that leptin deficiency may have a protective effect on ovarian reserve under certain genetic conditions ( Mollah et al., 2021 ). The differences in the effects between diet-induced and genetic obesity on ovarian reserve may be influenced by leptin, as diet-induced obesity is often accompanied by elevated circulating leptin levels, which may accelerate follicular overactivation through stimulation of the HPO axis. Elevated leptin might also directly affect granulosa cells by inhibiting anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) expression, contributing to excessive follicle depletion ( Merhi et al., 2013 ). In addition to reduced ovarian reserve, increased extracellular matrix deposition, fibrosis, and the accumulation of senescent cells are also hallmarks of ovarian aging. These changes are also commonly observed in PCOS ( Zhou et al., 2017 ). Chronic low-grade inflammation in the ovary is believed to contribute to these ovarian aging phenotypes ( Isola et al., 2024 ). Increased ovarian fibrosis and the accumulation of senescent cells have been observed in HFD-induced obese rats and OB/OB mice, characterized by increased expression of p21 and p16, increased lipofuscin staining, and macrophage infiltration ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). Additionally, ovarian fibrosis phenotypes similar to those observed in age-dependent ovarian aging have been reported in genetic obesity mice with Alms1 gene mutations ( Umehara et al., 2022 ). Macrophages may play an important role in mediating inflammation-induced ovarian fibrosis and aging. The pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage phenotype is predominant in obese and PCOS ovaries ( Feng et al., 2023 ) and promotes granulosa cell apoptosis and follicular atresia through the production of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1α/β, IL-6, and IL-18, thereby promoting the high expression of inflammasome genes such as NLRP3 and apoptosis associated speck like protein containing caspase activation and recruitment domain (ASC). During the later stages of reproductive age, increased extracellular matrix and fibrosis may also be linked to the M2 macrophage subtype, which produces factors such as TGF-β, FGF, and PDGF, as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, that contribute to fibrosis ( Vasse et al., 2021 ). Besides, both obesity and aging can induce similar pathological changes in the ovarian microenvironment, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, liptoxicity and inflammation ( Wu et al., 2015 ; Snider and Wood, 2019 ; Tatone et al., 2008 ). The anti-fibrotic drug BGP-15 can reverse obesity- and aging-induced ovarian fibrosis by inhibiting M2 macrophage polarization and MMP13 protein upregulation, as well as correcting mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage, and ER stress in the ovarian stroma ( Umehara et al., 2022 ). Interestingly, metformin, a typical anti-inflammatory and anti-aging drug, has also been found to prevent age-dependent ovarian aging in mice by altering the functional subpopulations of macrophages and fibroblasts in the ovary, and it can also reverse premature ovarian fibrosis in obese mice ( Umehara et al., 2022 ; Landry et al., 2022 ). PCOS is a common reproductive endocrine-metabolic disease among adolescent and reproductive-age women, which is characterized by infrequent ovulation, menstrual disorders, and HA, and is commonly associated with obesity, IR, and HA. The coexistence of these phenotypes in PCOS can be understood as an adaptive response to adverse environments such as resource scarcity. Elevated androgen levels, in particular, may represent an evolutionary adaptation that enabled females to engage in survival activities, such as hunting or defending against predators, by enhancing energy mobilization and physical resilience ( Parker et al., 2022 ). Additionally, IR can also be present in individuals with PCOS who have a normal BW ( Diamanti-Kandarakis and Dunaif, 2012 ). In women with PCOS, IR and hyperinsulinemia are key contributors to elevated androgen levels through multiple mechanisms: a) Insulin inhibits hepatic production of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), leading to increased circulating free testosterone levels ( Preziosi et al., 1993 ); b) Insulin acts directly on the InsR in theca cells or enhance the effect of IGF-1 on theca cells by reducing insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs), thereby increasing LH-dependent ovarian androgen production ( Franks and Hardy, 2018 ); c) Insulin can centrally stimulate the pituitary to secrete more LH, further promoting excessive androgen production by theca cells and ovarian stromal cells ( Figure 3 ). In a physiological context, androgens play a crucial role in female reproductive health, bone integrity, and cognitive function ( Bianchi et al., 2021 ). However, excessive androgen levels in women can result in systemic damage. HA promotes the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes, resulting in adipocyte hypertrophy and central obesity. This exacerbates dyslipidemia, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation, which in turn worsen both obesity and IR ( Lonardo et al., 2024 ). The systemic effects of elevated androgens are linked to an increased risk of CVD, NAFLD, T2DM, and malignancies in PCOS patients ( Ye et al., 2021 ). Moreover, excessive androgen exposure in utero can predispose female offspring to obesity, PCOS, and other metabolic disorders in adulthood ( Abbott et al., 1998 ; Nohara et al., 2013 ; Padmanabhan et al., 2010 ; Recabarren et al., 2005 ). Additionally, elevated androgens also disrupt the HPO axis, impairing ovulation and reproductive function. Although androgen receptor (AR) expression is higher in the male brain compared to the female brain, ARs are also present in the hypothalamus and extrahypothalamic nuclei of females, including fetal female mice ( Handa et al., 1986 ). Under hyperandrogenic conditions, AR activation in the hypothalamus may induce inflammation ( Ubba et al., 2023 ) and alter the firing frequency of GnRH neurons, thereby affecting their pulsatile release through GABA signaling, which likely increases LH pulse frequency not via kisspeptin pathways ( Moore et al., 2015 ). At the pituitary level, AR activation enhances the pituitary’s sensitivity to GnRH, particularly increasing LH secretion, leading to the characteristic elevated LH/FSH ratio seen in PCOS ( Schanbacher et al., 1987 ). At the ovarian level, excess androgens suppress granulosa cell proliferation through mechanisms such as upregulating phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression, which is PPARγ-dependent, or by disrupting WNT signaling, both of which lead to follicular arrest and polycystic ovary formation ( Chen et al., 2015 ; McFee et al., 2021 ). Additionally, androgens regulate granulosa cell apoptosis through inflammatory pathways, promoting inflammasome expression and pyroptosis ( Wang et al., 2020 ). Androgens can also inhibit granulosa cell proliferation by suppressing interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) expression, thereby contributing to ovarian dysfunction in PCOS ( Li Y. et al., 2019 ; Figure 3 ). Interestingly, studies suggest that neuron-specific AR signaling may play a more critical role in the development of PCOS phenotypes than peripheral AR ( Caldwell et al., 2017 ). For instance, mice with neuron-specific AR deletion (NeuARKO) are resistant to developing the PCOS phenotype induced by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) ( Caldwell et al., 2017 ). In contrast, global AR knockout mice (ARKO) treated with testosterone exhibit normal estrous cycles and corpus luteum formation, suggesting that the action of testosterone may primarily occur in non-ovarian tissues, which is the key site for the androgenic action that produces the PCOS phenotype ( Caldwell et al., 2017 ). Obesity is known to disrupt the gut microbiota, which plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolism, immunity, and endocrine functions. Dysbiosis, or imbalanced gut microbiota, is increasingly recognized as a contributing factor in metabolic and reproductive disorders, including obesity, T2DM, and PCOS ( Winter and Bäumler, 2023 ). Studies have shown that obesity is characterized by reduced microbial diversity, with a lower ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes compared to healthy controls ( Ley et al., 2006 ). In obese individuals, the gut microbiota undergoes compositional changes, including an increase in Actinobacteria and a decrease in Bacteroidetes, which correlate with systemic inflammation, IR, and disrupted endocrine signaling ( Chambers et al., 2019 ; Greenhill, 2015 ; Turnbaugh et al., 2009 ). Additionally, metagenomic sequencing of fecal nucleic acids has also revealed that patients with irregular menstrual cycles exhibit higher levels of prevotella and lower levels of clostridiales , ruminococcus , and lachnospiraceae (butyrate-producing bacteria) compared to those with regular cycles, suggesting a potential link between gut microbiota and female reproductive health ( Sasaki et al., 2019 ). Moreover, HFD impairs gut barrier function, leading to endotoxemia and chronic inflammation, IR, hyperandrogenism, and ovarian dysfunction—key features of PCOS ( Tremellen and Pearce, 2012 ). Alterations in gut microbial diversity and composition are also prominent features in patients with PCOS and rodent models of PCOS ( Li et al., 2024 ; Qi X. et al., 2019 ). For instance, specific microbial signatures have been identified in PCOS patients and animal models, such as an increase in Bacteroides vulgatus and a reduction in Odoribacter in the feces of hyperandrogenic PCOS mice ( Qi X. et al., 2019 ; Yang et al., 2024 ). This suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis may directly contribute to the metabolic and reproductive disturbances observed in obesity and PCOS. Furthermore, hyperandrogenic PCOS patients also exhibit decreased microbial richness, characterized by an increase in genera such as bifidobacterium , unclassified enterobacteriaceae , streptococcus , saccharomycetaceae , enterococcus , and the eubacterium nodatum ( Li et al., 2024 ). Current research suggests that the gut microecosystem may influence physiological and pathological processes through several mechanisms: a) Hormonal Regulation: The gut microbiota produce bioenzymes that assist in nutrient digestion and metabolite synthesis and may be involved in hormone degradation and modification, affecting host metabolism and reproduction ( Ervin et al., 2019 ); b) Endocrine Signaling: The gastrointestinal tract produces hormones like ghrelin, NPY, growth hormone-releasing peptide, GLP-1, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), which act on organs such as the hypothalamus, pituitary, adrenal glands, and ovaries, thus regulating metabolism and the HPO axis ( Izzi-Engbeaya and Dhillo, 2022 ); c) Gut-Derived Metabolites: Metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), LPS, and bile acids (BA) have diverse biological activities, regulating metabolism, immunity, inflammation, and endocrine functions ( Figure 4 ; Joyce and Clarke, 2024 ). Gut microbiota-brain axis and gut microbiota-ovary axis The gut microbiota reduces the production of SCFAs, such as acetate and butyrate, which affects the production of gut peptides like GLP-1, PYY, GHRP, and Leptin, as well as neurotransmitters like serotonin, GABA, and tryptophan, thereby weakening the hypothalamic satiety effect. Moreover, dysregulation of microbial metabolism increases intestinal permeability and LPS levels, leading to hypothalamic insulin and leptin resistance, which in turn affects appetite and metabolism. In PCOS mice, LPS induces ovarian macrophage pyroptosis via IFN-γ and TLR-p38MAPK/ERK, affecting estrogen synthesis in GC, increasing the production of inflammatory factors like IL-6 and TNF-α, and leading to abnormal oocyte development. SCFA: short-chain fatty acids, GABA: gamma-aminobutyric acid, PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome, LPS: lipopolysaccharides, Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide. The impact of obesity and hormonal imbalances on gut microbiota has become an important area of research, particularly in relation to reproductive health. One key factor influencing gut microbial composition is the presence of androgens. For instance, studies on female rats treated with dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) have demonstrated changes in gut microbiota composition, such as a decrease in Bacteroides and an increase in anaerobes and Clostridium . Transplanting feces from DHEA-treated rats into pseudo-germ-free recipient rats induced metabolic and reproductive dysfunction phenotypes of PCOS, suggesting that androgen exposure may influence metabolic and reproductive functions by altering gut microbial composition ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). In addition, maternal exposure to androgens during pregnancy has been shown to impact the microbiota of offspring. One study revealed that prenatal androgen exposure increased the abundance of bacteria associated with steroid hormone synthesis, such as nocardiaceae and clostridiaceae , while decreasing the abundance of akkermansia , bacteroides , lactobacillus , and clostridium ( Sherman et al., 2018 ). Similarly, rats exposed to androgens early in life also exhibited metabolic dysfunction and decreased gut microbial diversity in adulthood, with significant increases in the abundance of firmicutes and Bacteroidetes ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). Although the exact mechanisms remain unclear, sex hormones, including estrogens and androgens, likely influence gut microbiota through both direct and indirect actions. For example, sex hormones such as E2 and P may regulate bacterial metabolism directly through their receptors on gut bacteria, including estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) ( Chen and Madak-Erdogan, 2016 ). Moreover, these hormones can serve as growth factors for certain anaerobic bacteria, promoting their proliferation ( Hussain et al., 2021 ). Additionally, sex hormones may influence gut microbiota metabolism by altering substrate availability, a process mediated by changes in bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUSB) activity. Many gut bacteria produce GUSB enzymes that catalyze the release of glucuronic acid from host-derived substrates, such as sex hormones, which gut bacteria then use as a carbon source to promote their growth ( Walsh et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, sex hormones may indirectly affect the gut microbiota by altering the gut microenvironment or modulating immune function through receptors in gut cells ( Coquoz et al., 2022 ; Nie et al., 2018 ). Sex hormones can influence the characteristics of gut microbiota, which in turn modulate hormonal homeostasis in the host. For example, the gut microbiota contains genes encoding estrogen-metabolizing enzymes, defined as the “estrobolome,” of which GUSB is considered a member ( Ervin et al., 2019 ). During estrogen metabolism, E2 is first inactivated in the liver and conjugated with glucuronic acid by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), allowing its excretion into the intestine via bile. Intestinal microbiota then deconjugate glucuronic acid using GUSB, leading to reabsorption of estrogen into the enterohepatic circulation, thereby increasing overall estrogen levels in the body ( Sher and Rahman, 2000 ). Disruption of this process due to gut microbiota dysfunction, such as reduced bacterial GUSB activity, can alter hormone dissociation processes, leading to changes in circulating hormone levels, potentially contributing to the development of obesity, metabolic syndrome, CVD, and cognitive decline. Conversely, an increase in the abundance of GUSB-producing bacteria may induce pathological conditions of estrogen excess, leading to elevated circulating free estrogen levels and contributing to the development of diseases such as endometriosis and other estrogen-related cancers ( Wei et al., 2023 ). Although there is no direct evidence on whether female gut microbiota can regulate testosterone levels in the body, studies in male mice have shown that non-glucuronidated DHT is 70 times higher in feces than in serum, indicating that the gut microbiota is involved in deglucuronidation ( Kawai et al., 2021 ). In contrast, high levels of glucuronidated testosterone and DHT were detected in the distal colon of germ-free mice, while free DHT levels were very low. This study suggests that gut microbiota may also regulate host serum androgen levels through the process of deglucuronidation. The effect of gut microbiota on androgen levels has also been demonstrated through fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experiments, such as transplanting gut microbiota from female rats into adult male rats, which reduced testosterone levels ( Feješ et al., 2024 ), while transplanting gut microbiota from PCOS patients or B. vulgatus into germ-free female mice increased testosterone levels, induced IR, and disrupted estrous cycles, resulting in PCOS-like phenotypes in the recipient mice ( Qi X. et al., 2019 ). Previous studies have shown that FMT is insufficient to reduce the BMI or fat mass of obese patients; however, it has beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and metabolism ( Guzzardi et al., 2023 ). The “gut-microbiota-brain axis” refers to the bidirectional communication between the brain and gut microbiota through neuronal pathways, the immune system, and neurotransmitter-mediated signaling networks. This axis is fundamental in maintaining homeostasis in the central nervous system and the gastrointestinal system ( Morais et al., 2021 ). Certain gut microbes produce SCFAs such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in enteroendocrine cells (EECs), to release appetite-regulating hormones such as GLP-1, PYY, growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP), and leptin, which then act on the hypothalamus to influence feeding behavior, satiety, and energy balance ( Samuel et al., 2008 ; Tolhurst et al., 2012 ). Additionally, gut-derived SCFAs, such as acetate, can directly influence the hypothalamus by modulating the activity of neuropeptides like NPY and AgRP through the AMPK pathway, which is involved in suppressing appetite ( Frost et al., 2014 ). Gut microbes also produce various neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, GABA, and tryptophan, which can act on the hypothalamus to influence its neuroendocrine functions, thereby influencing appetite regulation. Lastly, alterations in gut microbiota can increase gut permeability, leading to elevated levels of LPS in the bloodstream. This promotes systemic and hypothalamic inflammation, mediating insulin and LR and consequently affecting feeding behavior and metabolism. Beyond appetite regulation, the gut-brain axis also plays a role in reproductive endocrinology, particularly in conditions like obesity and PP. A clinical study found significant differences in the gut microbiota of girls with CPP compared to healthy controls, with CPP patients showing increased abundances of alistipes , klebsiella , and sutterella ( Li et al., 2021 ). These gut bacteria may influence neuroactivity by modulating pathways such as NO synthesis, which can stimulate GnRH secretion, a key regulator of puberty onset ( Ceccatelli et al., 1993 ). Elevated NO might also promote IR, linking obesity and CPP ( Sansbury and Hill, 2014 ). Acetate synthesis and NO synthesis were higher in CPP patients ( Li et al., 2021 ). In animal models, HFD advanced puberty onset in female mice while also increasing serum E2, leptin, deoxycholic acid (DCA), and GnRH levels ( Bo et al., 2022 ). Supplementation with SCFAs, such as acetate, propionate and butyrate, has been shown to reverse early puberty and restore normal GnRH levels in these models ( Wang et al., 2022 ). Furthermore, transplantation of HFD microbiota into germ-free mice resulted in early puberty, suggesting that gut microbiota directly influence GnRH production through hypothalamic signaling ( Bo et al., 2022 ). In PCOS, alterations in gut microbiota composition and SCFA production may also contribute to hormonal imbalances. A clinical study of PCOS patients found an increase in GABA-producing gut bacteria, including bacteroides distasonis, bacteroides fragilis, and escherichia coli, which were significantly positively correlated with serum LH levels and the LH/FSH ratio ( Liang et al., 2021 ). GABA, a neurotransmitter, is believed to promote GnRH and LH secretion, which may contribute to the reproductive features associated with PCOS ( Silva et al., 2019 ). Additionally, SCFA levels are often reduced in PCOS patients; however, supplementation with probiotic Lactobacillus bifidus V9 has been shown to restore SCFA production, balance hormone levels, and reduce LH/FSH ratios, suggesting a role for SCFAs in gut-brain axis-mediated regulation of the central nervous system ( Zhang et al., 2019 ). The role of GLP-1 in mediating the effects of gut microbiota on reproductive health has also gained attention. As an important gut hormone ( Huang X. et al., 2024 ), GLP-1 production is also influenced by gut microbiota. For example, studies have found that antibiotic-induced reduction of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the gut of mice significantly increased serum GLP-1 levels and GLP-1 expression in gut endocrine L cells, improving IR in diet-induced obese mice ( Hwang et al., 2015 ). Similarly, dietary fiber intake can increase the production of SCFAs by gut microbiota, which subsequently stimulates GLP-1 secretion by acting on GPR41/FFAR3 and GPR43/FFAR2 on gut endocrine L cells, thereby improving obesity and IR ( Samuel et al., 2008 ; Tolhurst et al., 2012 ; Nøhr et al., 2013 ). GLP-1 has been shown to influence LH synthesis and GnRH neuronal activity, enhancing reproductive functions in animal models ( Farkas et al., 2016 ; Outeiriño-Iglesias et al., 2015 ). These studies suggest the potential role of GLP-1 in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Due to the efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in improving metabolic and reproductive endocrine dysfunction in PCOS, they are considered promising therapeutic agents for this condition ( Figure 4 ; Babar et al., 2023 ). Emerging evidence supports the existence of a direct “gut-microbiota-ovary axis,” where gut microbiota can influence ovarian function. Alterations in gut microbiota composition have been shown to affect ovarian function, as demonstrated by experiments in female mice where transplantation of gut microbiota from young mice into older mice led to improved follicular development and enhanced ovarian function ( Xu et al., 2022 ). Similarly, supplementation with an appropriate amount of lycium barbarum polysaccharide promoted follicular development by increasing the beneficial gut microbiota such as faecalibaculum , bilophila , and anaerofustis in female mice ( Zheng et al., 2023 ). Differences in gut microbiota composition have also been linked to fertility in different animal breeds. For instance, Meishan sows with higher fertility exhibited larger ovarian weights, better follicular development, more functional follicles, fewer atretic follicles, and less granulosa cell apoptosis compared to Landrace × Yorkshire (L × Y) sows with lower fertility. These breeds also exhibited different gut microbiota and metabolomic characteristics, with Meishan sows displaying higher gut microbial α-diversity, stronger carbohydrate metabolism in the feces, and higher levels of SCFAs ( Xu et al., 2023 ). Further research revealed that SCFAs produced by these gut bacteria protect ovarian granulosa cells from apoptosis and enhance ovarian hormone production ( Xu et al., 2023 ). Butyrate, in particular, enhanced E2 and P production in porcine granulosa cells by activating GPCRs ( Lu et al., 2017 ). Moreover, SCFAs, such as butyrate, were found to mitigate ovarian inflammation in obese PCOS mice, further supporting the role of SCFAs in regulating ovarian function ( Liu K. et al., 2023 ). Conversely, gut microbiota, particularly an overabundance of endotoxin-producing bacteria such as Desulfovibrio, can lead to elevated circulating LPS levels, which induce inflammation in the ovaries, increase intestinal permeability, and impair estrogen synthesis, thereby contributing to reproductive dysfunction in obesity and PCOS ( Taylor and Terranova, 1995 ; Tremellen et al., 2015 ). In HFD mice, impaired intestinal barrier results in the significant accumulation of L-saccharopine in the feces, serum, and ovaries, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction that subsequently impacts oocyte quality and reduces estrogen production ( Wen et al., 2024 ). LPS also stimulates granulosa cells to produce pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α through non-innate immune pathways mediated by TLR-p38MAPK/ERK, influencing follicular health and increasing rates of meiotic arrest in oocytes ( Bromfield and Sheldon, 2011 ). In DHEA-induced PCOS mice, an increase in gut Gram-negative bacteria such as desulfovibrio and burkholderia led to high LPS levels, which induced pyroptosis in ovarian macrophages mediated by IFN-γ, resulting in impaired estrogen synthesis and increased apoptosis of granulosa cells ( Figure 4 ; Huang et al., 2022 ). These findings suggest that local ovarian inflammation induced by elevated LPS levels due to gut microbiota dysbiosis and increased gut permeability may be a significant contributor to obesity-related ovarian dysfunction. Gut microbiota provides a crucial link between obesity and reproductive health by influencing both metabolic and hormonal pathways. Dysbiosis in obesity leads to systemic inflammation, IR, and altered sex hormone metabolism, all of which contribute to the development of reproductive disorders such as PCOS. As discussed, gut microbiota directly affects the HPO axis, modulate the production of reproductive hormones, and impact ovarian health through SCFAs, endotoxins, and other metabolites. Furthermore, these microbial changes are not merely passive bystanders but actively contribute to the pathogenesis of obesity-related reproductive dysfunctions.

Conclusion

The intricate relationship between obesity and female reproductive and endocrine functions has emerged as a critical area of contemporary biomedical research, driven by the escalating global prevalence of obesity ( Yong et al., 2023 ). This interdisciplinary field recognizes that obesity is not merely a metabolic disorder but a significant contributor to a complex array of hormonal imbalances and reproductive dysfunctions, profoundly impacting women’s health and fertility. Advances in understanding the underlying mechanisms have highlighted the multifaceted nature of this interaction, involving hormonal alterations, chronic inflammation, metabolic perturbations, and disruptions along the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. In this review, we examined the co-regulatory mechanisms that link energy metabolism and female reproduction from an evolutionary perspective, highlighting the significance of these interconnected pathways in the pathogenesis of reproductive endocrine dysfunction. This insight suggests that targeted interventions addressing these mechanisms could simultaneously improve both metabolic health and reproductive endocrine function in obese women. It is important to recognize that the negative impact of obesity on women’s reproductive health extends beyond disruptions in the HPO axis; it is also associated with various pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes ( Schon et al., 2024 ), including higher rates of miscarriage and poorer outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization (IVF) ( Klenov and Jungheim, 2014 ). Additionally, reproductive endocrine dysfunction can be both a consequence of obesity and a contributor to metabolic disturbances. For instance, hyperandrogenism in women can induce obesity and IR, while postmenopausal hypoestrogenism and elevated FSH levels are closely associated with increased obesity risk in middle-aged and older women ( Kim SM. et al., 2024 ; Zhu et al., 2023 ). Recent genetic studies have also begun to unravel the shared genetic bases between higher BMI and various female reproductive disorders, indicating a deeper, inherent connection beyond environmental factors. These studies have identified common risk loci and biological pathways, underscoring the evolutionary connection between metabolic processes and reproductive endocrine function, further illustrating the bidirectional relationship between these factors ( Kwon and Cho, 2025 ; Shao et al., 2025 ). Despite the insights gained, several critical scientific questions remain unresolved. Firstly, in the brain, neurons such as those in the hypothalamic GnRH and Kisspeptin systems are certainly not the only or primary targets for obesity and related endocrine and inflammatory factors. These factors may act on other brain regions or even higher-level brain regions, and indirectly affect the hypothalamic metabolism and reproductive regulation centers through complex neural circuits, thereby determining the impact of obesity on reproductive endocrinology. For instance, some recent studies also indicate that obesity can impair cognitive function and is associated with widespread changes in brain structure ( Oliveras-Cañellas et al., 2023 ; Sakib et al., 2023 ). Furthermore, obesity is also associated with various mood disorders and behavioral abnormalities ( Wang RZ. et al., 2024 ). Whether and how damage to multiple brain regions and functions affects the HPG axis requires further study. In terms of peripheral aspects, the molecular mechanisms by which obesity-related metabolic regulatory factors directly control gonadal germ cells and endocrine cells require more in-depth research. Through such studies, we may discover additional targets for improving reproductive endocrine-related diseases by improving obesity and metabolic conditions. For example, in our unpublished research, we found that PCOS mouse granulosa cells have PPARγ-dependent lipid metabolism disorders. The use of medium-chain triglyceride diets not only improved the lipid metabolism issues in PCOS mice but also, through the PPARγ pathway, altered the endocrine function of mouse granulosa cells. These findings also suggest that the connection between metabolism and reproduction involves not only certain neurotransmitters and endocrine factors but may also include important transcription factors related to metabolic regulation. Additionally, exploring sex-specific differences in metabolic responses and reproductive physiology is crucial. Historically, female physiology has been underrepresented in basic and clinical research ( MacGregor et al., 2025 ). Addressing this gap will provide a more comprehensive understanding of how obesity uniquely affects women’s reproductive health compared to men. Additionally, exploring more genetic and epigenetic co-regulatory mechanisms between metabolism and reproduction through advanced research methodologies, such as multi-omics research methods, will be imperative. In terms of treatment, further clinical research is essential to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and specific strategies of obesity interventions, such as diet, exercise, medication, and surgery, in improving reproductive endocrine function and reproductive health. The integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and computational modeling, holds significant potential for identifying individuals at risk, predicting treatment responses, and developing personalized management plans for obesity-related reproductive disorders. Such tools can help manage complex datasets generated from multi-omics research and clinical trials, leading to more efficient and effective interventions ( Guan et al., 2023 ). The future of research in this area will undoubtedly be characterized by a holistic, interdisciplinary approach aimed at restoring optimal reproductive and endocrine health in obese women.

Obesity Related

From the perspective of clinical research evidence, the risk of anovulatory infertility increases proportionally with higher BMI, highlighting the significant influence of BW on reproductive health ( Rich-Edwards et al., 1994 ). Specifically, when BMI exceeds 29, the probability of conception decreases by approximately 5% ( van der Steeg et al., 2008 ), while each additional unit increase in BMI reduces the likelihood of achieving pregnancy via In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) by 2.2%–4.3%. Consequently, approximately 33% of obese women fail to conceive naturally even after 1 year of attempting ( Lake et al., 1997 ). Obesity also leads to complications in pregnancy outcomes ( Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive MedicinePractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2021 ). PCOS is responsible for 80% of anovulatory infertility cases in women, with hyperandrogenism (HA) observed in 60%–80% of affected individuals ( Azziz et al., 2006 ; Balen et al., 2016 ). The condition is notably more prevalent among obese women, who are 30% more likely to develop PCOS compared to non-obese women. In fact, up to 60% of women with PCOS are affected by overweight or obesity, highlighting the strong association between BW and this disorder ( Teede et al., 2021 ). After accounting for the influence of childhood weight, the risk of menstrual irregularities in obese women increases by 1.97 times, with the prevalence of amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea also increasing alongside higher BMI. Studies have shown that obesity at age 7 is an independent predictor of menstrual problems later in life, such as at age 33 ( Lake et al., 1997 ). Notably, central obesity is a better predictor of ovulatory dysfunction than overall BF, with women experiencing anovulation typically presenting with larger Waist circumference (WC) compared to ovulating women with similar BMI ( Zaadstra et al., 1993 ). In addition, central precocious puberty (CPP), caused by the early activation of the HPO axis, is strongly associated with increased BMI. Overweight or obese children are nearly twice as likely to develop CPP compared to their normal-weight peers ( Biro et al., 2010 ; Liu et al., 2021 ). Obesity has been identified as an independent risk factor for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), characterized by a significant decline in ovarian function before the age of 40. This is supported by a multicenter cross-sectional study involving participants from eight European countries, which also found that maintaining a normal weight and never smoking are protective factors ( Vogt et al., 2022 ). While the exact mechanisms by which obesity contributes to POI remain unclear, obesity and POI likely share common risk factors. For instance, excessive exposure to environmental endocrine disruptors is implicated in both the development of obesity and the onset of POI and early menopause ( Ding et al., 2022 ). Additionally, a higher BMI is associated with an earlier age at menarche, which in turn is a recognized risk factor for early menopause ( Juul et al., 2017 ; Zhang X. et al., 2023 ). Obesity also increases the risk and severity of endometriosis, further linking it to early menopause and POI ( Trabert et al., 2011 ; Venkatesh et al., 2022 ).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-19T06:13:33.711413+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0