Augmenting Myometrial Healing after Cesarean Delivery: Use of an Adjuvant Biologic Graft Placement in an Ovine Model

We sought to reduce long-term complications after cesarean delivery by improving myometrial healing. Eight sheep (three with twins) underwent cesarean delivery. Hysterotomy sites were repaired in equal parts by suture alone or suture with a juxtaposed graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN). At 90 days postsurgery, scar characteristics and tensile strength testing were assessed. The mean hysterotomy closure time was on average 1 minute, 14 seconds longer for those undergoing graft placement (p = 0.36). The mean scar thickness was 3.0 ± 0.4 mm for controls versus 3.8 ± 1.2 mm for the intervention group (p = 0.047). Tensile strength testing did not demonstrate a significant difference between groups. Histological examination of the myometrial scar showed no significant differences in inflammatory reaction or endometrial inclusions; however, neoangiogenesis was significantly enhanced. Myometrial repair incorporating a graft increased scar thickness and neoangiogenesis. This methodology did not incite adenomyosis or enhance inflammation within the scar.

Cesarean delivery - graft - hysterotomy - ovine model - small intestinal submucosa

- 1 Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch I E. Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the “niche” in the scar. J Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20 1105-1115 - 2 Armstrong V, Hansen W F, VanVoorhis B J, Syrop C H. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. 2003; 101 61-65 - 3 Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E et al.. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31 72-77 - 4 Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C et al.. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23 289-292 - 5 Osser O V, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 90-97 - 6 Wang C B, Chiu W W, Lee C Y, Sun Y L, Lin Y H, Tseng C J. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 85-89 - 7 Rotas M A, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107 1373-1381 - 8 O'Brien J M, Barton J R, Donaldson E S. The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175 1632-1638 - 9 Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99 976-980 - 10 Boyle R K, Waters B A, O'Rourke P K. Blood transfusion for caesarean delivery complicated by placenta praevia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49 627-630 - 11 Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe H J, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996; 347 281-284 - 12 Pollio F, Staibano S, Mascolo M et al.. Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194 527-534 - 13 Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier R J. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201 320, e1-e6 - 14 Hodde J, Janis A, Ernst D, Zopf D, Sherman D, Johnson C. Effects of sterilization on an extracellular matrix scaffold: part I. Composition and matrix architecture. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 18 537-543 - 15 Hiles M, Record Ritchie R D, Altizer A M. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2009; 16 26-37 - 16 Sung V W, Rogers R G, Schaffer J I Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group et al. Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112 1131-1142 - 17 Alperin M, Feola A, Meyn L, Duerr R, Abramowitch S, Moalli P. Collagen scaffold: a treatment for simulated maternal birth injury in the rat model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202 589, e1-e8 - 18 Jernigan T W, Croce M A, Cagiannos C, Shell D H, Handorf C R, Fabian T C. Small intestinal submucosa for vascular reconstruction in the presence of gastrointestinal contamination. Ann Surg. 2004; 239 733-738 discussion 738-740 - 19 Franklin Jr M E, Treviño J M, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass J L, González J J. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22 1941-1946 - 20 Hodde J. Extracellular matrix as a bioactive material for soft tissue reconstruction. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76 1096-1100 - 21 Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Whitson B. Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res. 2001; 99 282-287 - 22 Stamilio D M, DeFranco E, Paré E et al.. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110 1075-1082 - 23 Bujold E, Gauthier R J. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115 1003-1006 - 24 Hamar B D, Saber S B, Cackovic M et al.. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110 808-813 - 25 Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 124 32-36 - 26 Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T et al.. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85 429-434 - 27 Dodd J M, Anderson E R, Gates S. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (3) CD004732 - 28 Chang Y, Tsai E M, Long C Y, Lee C L, Kay N. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200 370, e1-e4 - 29 Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15 172-175 John M O'BrienM.D. Director, Maternal Fetal Medicine University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536 Email: [email protected]