Does vaginal preparation with povidone–iodine prior to caesarean delivery reduce the risk of endometritis? A randomized controlled trial
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine before cesarean delivery reduced postpartum endometritis, particularly in women in labor or with ruptured membranes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine prior to caesarean delivery decreased the incidence of postpartum endometritis. METHODS: The present study was a prospective randomized controlled trial in which subjects received a vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately prior to caesarean delivery or received no vaginal preparation. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postpartum endometritis. RESULTS: A significant decrease in post-caesarean endometritis was noted in the group that received the povidone-iodine vaginal preparation (n = 334) compared with the control group (n = 336) [6.9 vs. 11.6%; RR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.03-2.76]. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of endometritis were noted between the experimental and control groups among women who were not in labor at the time of the caesarean delivery [9.2 vs. 8.6%; RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.58-1.90], and no differences were found between groups when women with ruptured membranes were excluded from the analysis [9.6 vs. 6.7%; RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.78-2.47]. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately prior to a caesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-operative endometritis. This preemptive measure was only found to be beneficial in women whose membranes had ruptured and those who were in labor prior to caesarean surgery.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (21)
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01087-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-198003001-00032 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.00980.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(80)91123-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000164032.16599.7e via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004737.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000158866.68311.d1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.005 via openalex
- doi:10.3201/eid0705.010511 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/01443615.2011.568644 via openalex
- W121474990 via openalex
- W166251446 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1068-607x(02)00119-1 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/9780203931639 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007892.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310330029019 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6661(199803/04)7:2<100::aid-mfm9>3.0.co;2-q via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0195-6701(95)90271-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000130 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-199404000-00009 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:39:31.692385+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK