Plasticity of extrachromosomal DNA segregation during drug adaptation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,895 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Uneven segregation during mitosis is a striking feature of extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA). Because ecDNA lacks a centromere, it is thought to segregate stochastically and randomly during cell division, thereby generating extensive intratumoral heterogeneity in genomic copy number. Several studies have reported that ecDNA copy numbers can readily change in response to drug treatment, which enables the cells to acquire drug resistance. However, the mechanisms underlying these dynamic changes remain poorly understood —particularly whether such copy-number changes result from static selection of pre-existing clones or from active reconfiguration under drug-induced stress. This key question remains unresolved, mainly due to the absence of technologies capable of tracking ecDNA copy number simultaneously across clones. To overcome this limitation, we developed a high-throughput framework that combines single-cell DNA sequencing with cellular barcoding for clonal tracking of ecDNA copy-number dynamics. The results of single-cell cloning experiments revealed that not all clones exhibit identical segregation modes even under drug-free conditions. Clonal tracking under drug treatment showed that resistant populations do not simply emerge from pre-existing clones with favorable ecDNA states; instead, some clones seemed capable of actively reconfiguring their segregation behavior, possibly involving neuron-like alternation in microtubule organization and intracellular transport pathways, to generate drug-resistant cells. These findings suggest that, although ecDNA might segregate stochastically, it may undergo nonrandom, actively regulated segregation under drug stress. This discovery allows the therapeutically targeting of ecDNA segregation mechanisms to counteract adaptive drug resistance. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00