A Characterization of Axolotl Digit Regeneration: Conserved Mechanisms, Divergent Patterning, and a Critical Role for Hedgehog Signaling

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Axolotl digits offer an experimentally versatile model for studying complex tissue regeneration. Here, we provide a comprehensive morphological and molecular characterization of digit regeneration, revealing both conserved features and notable divergences from classical limb regeneration. Digit blastemas progress through similar morphological stages, are nerve-dependent, contain key regenerative cell populations, and express many canonical morphogens and mitogens. However, they exhibit minimal expression of the A-P patterning genes Shh, Fgf8, and Grem1 ; suggesting distal outgrowth and patterning occur independently of these signals. Joint regenerative fidelity varies significantly across digits and cannot be explained by differences in nerve supply, cell proliferation, or differential expression of any patterning genes assessed in this study. Furthermore, functional experiments reveal Hedgehog signaling is essential for interphalangeal joint regeneration, but activation alone is insufficient to improve fidelity in less robust digits. This system combines experimental accessibility with intrinsic variation in regenerative outcomes, making it an ideal platform to identify critical determinants of successful tissue regeneration and refine models of appendage patterning.
Full text 1,374 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Axolotl digits offer an experimentally versatile model for studying complex tissue regeneration. Here, we provide a comprehensive morphological and molecular characterization of digit regeneration, revealing both conserved features and notable divergences from classical limb regeneration. Digit blastemas progress through similar morphological stages, are nerve-dependent, contain key regenerative cell populations, and express many canonical morphogens and mitogens. However, they exhibit minimal expression of the A-P patterning genes Shh, Fgf8, and Grem1; suggesting distal outgrowth and patterning occur independently of these signals. Joint regenerative fidelity varies significantly across digits and cannot be explained by differences in nerve supply, cell proliferation, or differential expression of any patterning genes assessed in this study. Furthermore, functional experiments reveal Hedgehog signaling is essential for interphalangeal joint regeneration, but activation alone is insufficient to improve fidelity in less robust digits. This system combines experimental accessibility with intrinsic variation in regenerative outcomes, making it an ideal platform to identify critical determinants of successful tissue regeneration and refine models of appendage patterning. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00