Stream Habitats and Aquatic Communities in an Agricultural Watershed: Responses to a Mandatory Riparian Buffer Law

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Riparian buffers along streams can intercept eroding soils, contaminants, and nutrients, improving stream habitats and increasing the health of aquatic communities. Instream and riparian habitats and fish and benthic invertebrate communities were surveyed in a Minnesota stream draining an agricultural watershed before and after implementation of a state-mandated buffer law passed in 2014 and aimed at protecting water quality. Intensive habitat assessments, electrofishing, and benthic invertebrate sampling were used at the same 13 sites in 2005 and 2018. Average buffer width nearly doubled between surveys, and instream abundance of fine sediments and embeddedness of coarse substrates by fine sediments both declined significantly within 1 to 3 years of buffer establishment. Stream sites also were significantly deeper with faster current velocities, and sites had increased riffle habitat and increased instream vegetative cover for fish after buffer mandates. However, fish and invertebrate biotic integrity scores, and other biotic community metrics, did not display significant improvements after buffer establishment. Stream habitats appear to respond quickly when intact and continuous riparian buffers insulate streams from surrounding agricultural activities, but improvements in biotic communities likely will require more time to adapt to changed habitat conditions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00