The #Enzian Classification as a Predictor of Hormonal Therapy Response in Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Referral Center

Observational OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29 ⓘ

This study found that the #Enzian classification correlates with endometriosis lesion distribution and predicts hormonal therapy efficacy, with POP-D being more effective for lower #Enzian scores.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound-based #Enzian classification predicts pain profiles and response to hormonal therapy in patients with endometriosis. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 10% of reproductive-age women, often causing debilitating pelvic pain. Although #Enzian is validated for surgical planning, its predictive role in medical therapy remains unexplored. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study, including 89 premenopausal patients referred between 2018 and 2023, was conducted. Hormonal therapies included progestin-only pills (dienogest - POP-D or other progestins - POP-O), combined estrogen-progestin pills (dienogest - EP-D or other EP-O), or norethisterone acetate. Pain was assessed via a 0-10 VAS at baseline, ≥3 months, and ≥6 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients had ultrasound-confirmed endometriosis and were hormone therapy-naïve for ≥6 months. Baseline evaluation included demographic data, reproductive history, prior surgeries, and six pain domains. #Enzian classification mapped lesion location and size (A: rectovaginal/vagina; B: uterosacral/parametria; C: rectum; FA: adenomyosis; FB: bladder; FU: ureter; FI: intestine above rectum; FO: extra pelvic; O: ovary; P: peritoneum; T: fallopian tubes/adhesions). Linear regression and linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between #Enzian compartments and pain trajectories. RESULTS: Dysmenorrhea occurred in 86.5%, and dyspareunia occurred in 56.2%. Ovarian endometriomas (O) were present in 76.4%, deep infiltrating endometriosis (A, B, C) in 51.7%, and adenomyosis (FA) in 66.3%. POP-D was most effective in reducing ovulatory pain in ovarian (O), uterosacral/parametria (B), rectal (C), and tubal/adhesion (T) involvement, while EP-D was superior for dyspareunia in T. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) remained refractory. Higher total #Enzian scores correlated with reduced therapy efficacy. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, single-center, small sample, use of aggregated pain scores, and incomplete follow-up may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-based #Enzian classification correlates with lesion distribution and predicts hormonal therapy efficacy. POP-D therapy is superior at lower #Enzian scores; CPP remains challenging. Findings support individualized medical management and warrant prospective validation including multidimensional pain and quality-of-life assessments.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain Enzian

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosisdie_deep_infiltratingchronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 7
progestin dienogest progestin estrogen progestin norethisterone acetate

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-08T06:11:02.401662+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-11-08T06:05:22.333187+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-12T09:48:33.364277+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-24T06:30:43.844863+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine