MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly applied in the evaluation of uterine fibroids. However, little is known about the reproducibility of MRI in the assessment of uterine fibroids. This study evaluates the inter- and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the uterine fibroids and concomitant adenomyosis in women scheduled for uterine artery embolization (UAE). Forty patients (mean age: 44.5 years) with symptomatic uterine fibroids who were scheduled for UAE underwent T1- and T2-weighted MRI. To study inter- and intraobserver agreement 40 MR images were evaluated independently by two observers and reevaluated by both observers 4 months later. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated using Cohen’s κ statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Inter-observer agreement for uterine volumes (κ = 0.99, p < 0.0001), dominant fibroid volumes (κ = 0.98, p ≤ 0.0001), and number of fibroids (κ = 0.88; CI, 0.77–0.93; p < 0.0001) was excellent. For the T1- and T2-weighted signal intensity of the dominant fibroid there was good agreement between the observers (87%; 95% CI, 71.9%–95.6%) and the intraobserver agreement was good for observer A (95%; 95% CI, 83.1%–99.4%) and moderate for observer B (κ = 0.47). The interobserver agreement with respect to the presence of adenomyosis was good (κ = 0.73, p < 0.0001), while both intraobserver agreements were fair to moderate (observer A, κ = 0.55, p = 0.0003; and observer B, κ = 0.66, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, MRI criteria used for the selection of suitable UAE patients show good inter- and intraobserver reproducibility. Similar content being viewed by others

Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. (2002) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(3):409–415 Omary RA, Vasireddy S, Chrisman HB, et al. (2002) The effect of pelvic MR imaging on the diagnosis and treatment of women with presumed symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(11):1149–1153 Jha RC, Ascher SM, Imaoka I, et al. (2000) Symptomatic fibroleiomyomata: MR imaging of the uterus before and after uterine arterial embolization. Radiology 217(1):228–235 Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Donderwinkel PF, et al. (2005) Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1618–1629 Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Birnie E, Ankum WM, Reekers JA (2007) Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: two-years’ outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(6):519.e1–11 Orsini LF, Salardi S, Pilu G, et al. (1984) Pelvic organs in premenarcheal girls: real-time ultrasonography. Radiology 153(1):113–116 Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, et al. (1995) Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 197(3):609–614 Byun JY, Kim SE, Choi BG, et al. (1999) Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings. Radiographics 19(Spec No.):S161–S170 Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174 Broekmans FJ, Heitbrink MA, Hompes PG, et al. (1996) Quantitative MRI of uterine leiomyomas during triptorelin treatment: reproducibility of volume assessment and predictability of treatment response. Magn Reson Imaging 14(10):1127–1135 Zawin M, McCarthy S, Scoutt LM, et al. (1990) High-field MRI and US evaluation of the pelvis in women with leiomyomas. Magn Reson Imaging 8(4):371–376 Dudiak CM, Turner DA, Patel SK, et al. (1988) Uterine leiomyomas in the infertile patient: preoperative localization with MR imaging versus US and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 167(3):627–630 Spies JB, Roth AR, Jha RC, et al. (2002) Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome. Radiology 222(1):45–52 Andrews RT, Spies JB, Sacks D, et al. (2004) Patient care and uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(2; Pt 1):115–120 Braude P, Reidy J, Nott V, et al. (2000) Embolization of uterine leiomyomata: current concepts in management. Hum Reprod Update 6(6):603–608 Walker WJ, Pelage JP, Sutton C (2002) Fibroid embolization. Clin Radiol 57(5):325–331 Burn PR, McCall JM, Chinn RJ, et al. (2000) Uterine fibroleiomyoma: MR imaging appearances before and after embolization of uterine arteries. Radiology 214(3):729–734 deSouza NM, Williams AD (2002) Uterine arterial embolization for leiomyomas: perfusion and volume changes at MR imaging and relation to clinical outcome. Radiology 222(2):367–374 Oguchi O, Mori A, Kobayashi Y, et al. (1995) Prediction of histopathologic features and proliferative activity of uterine leiomyoma by magnetic resonance imaging prior to GnRH analogue therapy: correlation between T2-weighted images and effect of GnRH analogue. J Obstet Gynaecol 21(2):107–117 Siskin GP, Tublin ME, Stainken BF, et al. (2001) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: clinical response and evaluation with MR imaging. AJR 177(2):297–302 Kim MD, Won JW, Lee DY, et al. (2004) Uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis without fibroids. Clin Radiol 59(6):520–526 Jha RC, Takahama J, Imaoka I, et al. (2003) Adenomyosis: MRI of the uterus treated with uterine artery embolization. AJR 181(3):851–856 Smith SJ, Sewall LE, Handelsman A (1999) A clinical failure of uterine fibroid embolization due to adenomyosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10(9):1171–1174 Pelage JP, Jacob D, Fazel A, et al. (2005) Midterm results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: initial experience. Radiology 234(3):948–953 Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, et al. (2007) Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. AJR 188(1):176–181 Silverberg SG, DeLellis RA, Frable WJ (1996) Principles and practice of surgical pathology and cytopathology. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingston, New York Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, et al. (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190(3):803–806 Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, et al. (2001) Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 16(11):2427–2433 Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. (1989) Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171(2):531–534 Acknowledgments The EMMY study is funded by ZonMw “Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development” (grant application no. 945-01-017) and supported by Boston Scientific Corporation, the Netherlands. We are indebted to all participating patients and EMMY Trial Group members and nurses. We thank M. Nuberg, H. van Welsum, and M. Cornet for their administrative efforts. The members of the EMMY Trial Group were as follows: Initiators—J. Reekers, W. Ankum, and G. Bonsel; Steering Committee—J. Reekers, W. Ankum, M. Burger, G. Bonsel, E. Birnie, G. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, H. van Overhagen, S. de Blok, and H. Vervest; Safety Committee—J. Evers, M. Prins, and J. van Engelshoven, Academic Hospital Maastricht, the Netherlands (nonparticipating center); Data Management and Analysis—W. Hehenkamp, E. Birnie, and N. Volkers; and Executive and Writing Committee—W. Hehenkamp, N. Volkers, E. Birnie, W. Ankum, and J. Reekers. Clinical centers were as follows (number of randomized patients is given in parentheses): Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (32)—J. Reekers, W. Ankum, M. Burger, G. Bonsel, E. Birnie, W. Hehenkamp, and N. Volkers; Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam (40)—S. de Blok and C. de Vries; Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen (4)—T. Salemans and G. Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Groningen University Hospital, Groningen (3)—D. Tinga and T. Prins; Bosch Medical Centre, Den Bosch (1)—P. Sluijffers and M. Rutten; Bronovo Hospital, The Hague (1)—M. Smeets and N. Aarts; Medical Centre Rijnmond-Zuid, Rotterdam (2)—P. van der Moer and D. Vroegindeweij; St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg (6)—F. Boekkooi and L. Lampmann; Flevo Hospital , Almere—G. Kleiverda; Gooi-Noord Hospital, Laren—R. Dik and J. Marsman; Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem (4)—C. de Nooijer , I. Hendriks, and G. Guit; Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague (4)—H. Ottervanger and H. van Overhagen; St. Lucas/Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam (4)—A. Thurkow; Martini Hospital, Groningen (10)—P. Donderwinkel, J. Wijma, and C. Holt; Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar (4)—A. Adriaanse and J. Wallis; Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden (9)—J. Hirdes, J. Schutte, and W. de Rhoter; Hospital Midden-Twente, Hengelo (6)—P. Paaymans and R. Schepers-Bok; Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede (5)—G. van Doorn, J. Krabbe, and A. Huisman; Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft (2)—M. Hermans and R. Dallinga; Slingeland Hospital, Doetichem (4)—F. Reijnders and J. Spithoven; St. Jans Gasthuis, Weert (1)—W. de Jager and P. Veekmans; Twenteborg Hospital, Almelo (6)—P. van der Heijden, M. Veereschild, and J. van den Hout; University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht (4)—I. van Seumeren, A. Heintz, R. Lo, and W. Mali; Westeinde Hospital, The Hague (2)—J. Lind and Th. de Rooy; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht (5)—M. Bulstra and F. Sanders; De Heel Hospital, Zaandam (1)—J. Doornbos; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem (3)—P. Dijkhuizen and M. van Kints; Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam (4)—Ph. Engelen and R. Heijboer; and BovenIJ Hospital, Amsterdam (5)—A. Dijkman. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Volkers, N.A., Hehenkamp, W.J.K., Spijkerboer, A.M. et al. MR Reproducibility in the Assessment of Uterine Fibroids for Patients Scheduled for Uterine Artery Embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31, 260–268 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9209-0 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9209-0