International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is often missed or delayed due to confusion with other causes of increased left ventricular wall thickness. Conventional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements like global longitudinal strain (GLS) has shown promise in distinguishing CA, but with limited specificity. We conducted a study to investigate the performance of a computer vision detection algorithm in across multiple international sites. Methods EchoNet-LVH is a computer vision deep learning algorithm for the detection of cardiac amyloidosis based on parasternal long axis and apical-4-chamber view videos. We conducted a multi-site retrospective case-control study evaluating EchoNet-LVH’s ability to distinguish between the echocardiogram studies of CA patients and controls. We reported discrimination performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and associated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value at the pre-specified threshold. Results EchoNet-LVH had an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI 0.875 – 0.916). At pre-specified model threshold, EchoNet-LVH had a sensitivity of 0.644 (95% CI 0.601 – 0.685), specificity of 0.988 (0.978 – 0.994), positive predictive value of 0.968 (95% CI 0.944 – 0.984), and negative predictive value of 0.828 (95% CI 0.804 – 0.850). There was minimal heterogeneity in performance by site, race, sex, age, BMI, CA subtype, or ultrasound manufacturer. Conclusion EchoNet-LVH can assist with earlier and accurate diagnosis of CA. As CA is a rare disease, EchoNet-LVH is highly specific in order to maximize positive predictive value. Further work will assess whether early diagnosis results in earlier initiation of treatment in this underserved population.
Full text 31,439 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm Grant Duffy , View ORCID Profile Evangelos K. Oikonomou , Jonathan Hourmozdi , Hiroki Usuku , Jigesh Patel , Yoshinori Katsumata , Wakako Yamasawa , Lily Stern , Shinichi Goto , View ORCID Profile Kenichi Tsujita , View ORCID Profile Rohan Khera , Faraz S. Ahmad , View ORCID Profile David Ouyang doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.14.24319049 Grant Duffy 1 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA, USA BS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Evangelos K. Oikonomou 2 Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA 3 Cardiovascular Data Science (CarDS) Lab, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA MD, DPhil Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Evangelos K. Oikonomou Jonathan Hourmozdi 4 Department of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine , Chicago, IL, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Hiroki Usuku 5 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University , Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jigesh Patel 1 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yoshinori Katsumata 6 Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine , Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Wakako Yamasawa 6 Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine , Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lily Stern 1 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shinichi Goto 6 Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine , Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan 7 One Brave Idea, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, MA, USA MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kenichi Tsujita 5 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University , Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Japan MD, PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Kenichi Tsujita Rohan Khera 2 Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA 3 Cardiovascular Data Science (CarDS) Lab, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA MD, MS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Rohan Khera Faraz S. Ahmad 4 Department of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine , Chicago, IL, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site David Ouyang 1 Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA, USA MD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for David Ouyang For correspondence: david.ouyang{at}cshs.org Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF ABSTRACT Background Diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is often missed or delayed due to confusion with other causes of increased left ventricular wall thickness. Conventional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements like global longitudinal strain (GLS) have shown promise in distinguishing CA, but with limited specificity. We conducted a multi-site retrospective case-control study to investigate the performance of a computer vision algorithm for CA identification across multiple international sites. Methods EchoNet-LVH is a computer vision deep learning algorithm for the detection of cardiac amyloidosis based on parasternal long axis and apical-4-chamber view videos. We evaluated EchoNet-LVH’s ability to distinguish between the echocardiogram studies of CA patients and controls. We reported discrimination performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and associated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value at the pre-specified threshold. Results EchoNet-LVH had an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI 0.875 – 0.916). At the pre-specified model threshold optimizing for specificity, EchoNet-LVH had a sensitivity of 0.644 (95% CI 0.601 – 0.685), specificity of 0.988 (0.978 – 0.994), positive predictive value of 0.968 (95% CI 0.944 – 0.984), and negative predictive value of 0.828 (95% CI 0.804 – 0.850). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in performance by site, race, sex, age, BMI, CA subtype, or ultrasound manufacturer. Conclusion EchoNet-LVH can assist with earlier and accurate diagnosis of CA. EchoNet-LVH achieved development goals to be highly specific to maximize positive predictive value of downstream confirmatory testing since CA is a rare disease. INTRODUCTION Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is caused by deposition of misfolded proteins in the myocardium, including transthyretin (ATTR) or immunoglobulin light chains (AL) 1 , 2 . Regardless of the etiology, CA leads to increased left ventricular wall thickness and heart failure, however early symptoms can be non-specific and not readily recognized 3 – 5 . Common echocardiographic measurements are insufficient to precisely discriminate CA from other etiologies of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or heart failure 6 – 8 . There is concern that CA is underdiagnosed and diagnosed too late, which limit the opportunity to receive recent targeted therapies that improve quality of life and decrease mortality outcomes in CA patients 9 – 11 . Recent research has focused on methods that can assist with early identification of CA 12 – 14 . Echocardiography is one of the most common initial tests when evaluating patients with heart failure symptoms, with typical CA features on including increased left ventricular wall thickness, normal or small left ventricular cavity, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and diastolic dysfunction 1 , 2 . However, many of these features are also commonly found in other forms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and have limited specificity to identify CA 6 , 8 , resulting hesitancy to highlight suspicion for CA. Recent advances in computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled precision phenotyping of structure and function in cardiac ultrasound as well as other forms of cardiovascular diagnostics 15 – 19 . AI applied to echocardiography can precisely estimate wall thickness 13 , assess mitral regurgitation severity 20 , and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 21 as well as detect cardiac amyloidosis 13 , HCM, and diastolic dysfunction 22 . EchoNet-LVH is one such computer vision model developed for the detection of CA 13 . An automated pipeline, EchoNet-LVH identifies parasternal long axis and apical-4-chamber views from transthoracic echocardiogram studies to precisely measure wall thickness and identify texture and motion suggestive of CA. Trained against other forms of left ventricular hypertrophy as controls against CA cases, EchoNet-LVH was designed to be specific in discriminating between CA and phenotypic mimics. In this study, we evaluated the performance EchoNet-LVH across multiple new healthcare systems on videos that the model has never seen before. We conducted a multi-site international retrospective case-control study evaluating EchoNet-LVH’s ability to distinguish between the echocardiogram studies of CA patients and controls. We reported discrimination performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and associated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value at a pre-specified threshold to identify CA. METHODS Study Design We conducted an international multicenter retrospective case-control cohort study with participants from multiple geographically distinct healthcare systems to evaluate EchoNet-LVH. EchoNet-LVH was previously developed using CA cases and controls from Stanford Healthcare 20 , so this study serves as temporally and geographically distinct external validation. Patients were sourced from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, Keio University in Tokyo, Japan, Northwestern Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, and Yale-New Haven Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut. A total of 520 patients were identified as having CA and matched to 903 randomly selected controls from patients receiving echocardiography and at least 65 years of age. CA patients were diagnosed with transthyretin (ATTR), light chain (AL) amyloidosis, or other forms of cardiac amyloidosis using a combination of nuclear cardiac amyloid imaging (including SPECT/CT with approved bone radiotracers, such as Tc 99m -pyrophosphate), monoclonal gammopathy testing, genetic testing, and/or tissue biopsy. The controls either had negative testing for cardiac amyloidosis or testing was not performed. Given the low population prevalence of CA, the likelihood of undiagnosed CA in the controls was thought to be minor and unlikely to change the analysis. This study was approved by the Cedars-Sinai Institutional Review Board. Computer Vision Model EchoNet-LVH’s development approach and internal validation has been previously described 20 . In short, EchoNet-LVH is an automated machine learning pipeline that automatically identifies parasternal long axis and apical-4-chamber views from transthoracic echocardiogram studies, precisely measures wall thickness, and assesses texture and motion from the apical-4-chamber view echocardiogram videos to assess suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis. Information from the apical-4-chamber view is synthesized with a segmentation model’s assessment of wall thickness from the parasternal long axis videos to come up with a suspicion for CA. Given the low population prevalence of CA, a prespecified threshold (0.8) in the summative assessment was chosen to optimize and prioritize for specificity, which in turn, maximizes positive predictive value. Echocardiogram videos were obtained in DICOM format and a fully automatic pipeline analyzed the study. All sites ran the model independently without transfer of imaging data through the sharing of a Docker container with code for the full end-to-end pipeline. Statistical Analysis Continuous variables were reported using median (interquartile range), and categorical variables were reported with number (percentage). Performance of in the model for discriminating CA was evaluated using area under the receiver operator curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were assessed for all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed in Python (Python Software Foundation, Beaverton, Oregon). RESULTS Demographics and clinical characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1 . The mean age of the cohort was 78.2 (IQR 72 – 84) and 77.7% male, with cases matched 2:1 with controls greater than 65 years of age. In the cases, there was representation from both AL (22.7%) and ATTR (74.2%) amyloidosis. There was a wide range of age, BMI, and ultrasound manufacturers across the sites with subgroup analysis to evaluate for heterogeneity of EchoNet-LVH performance.. Download figure Open in new tab FIGURE 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for EchoNet-LVH Overall performance of AI algorithm and subset by site. CSMC = Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, NU = Northwestern University, YNHH = Yale New Haven Hospital View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Patient Characteristics EchoNet-LVH had an overall AUC of 0.896 (95% CI 0.875 - 0.916) with minimal site level variation in performance ( Table 2 ). The lowest site AUC was YNHHS (Yale-New Haven Health System) with an AUC 0.860 (95% CI 0.818 – 0.898) and the highest site AUC was Keio University with an AUC of 0.944 (95% CI 0.911 – 0.971). The overall sensitivity was 0.644 (95% CI 0.601 – 0.685) and the overall specificity was 0.988 (95% CI 0.978 – 0.994). There was no significant heterogeneity in other performance characteristics across site. At a 2:1 ratio of controls to cases, EchoNet-LVH had a PPV of 0.968 (95% CI 0.944 – 0.984) and a NPV of 0.828 (95% CI 0.804 – 0.850). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Overall performance. CSMC = Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, NU = Northwestern University, YNHH = Yale New Haven Hospital, PPV = Positive Predictive Value, NPV = Negative Predictive Value EchoNet-LVH also had similar performance across patient characteristics and ultrasound manufacturer ( Table 3 ). EchoNet-LVH had an AUC of 0.921 (95% CI 0.882 - 0.955) for detecting AL cardiac amyloidosis and an AUC of 0.887 (95% CI 0.862 - 0.911) for detecting ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Our model had similar performance for men (AUC of 0.893 [95% CI 0.869 – 0.914]) and women (AUC of 0.904 [95% CI 0.849 – 0.950]). There was no significant heterogeneity by race, age, BMI, or ultrasound manufacturer. Across all key groups, there was similar sensitivity and specificity of our approach, and there was no trend for differences in performance across subclasses. View this table: View inline View popup Table 3. Subgroup performance. PPV = Positive Predictive Value, NPV = Negative Predictive Value, BMI = Body Mass Index DISCUSSION In this study, we evaluated the performance of a computer vision driven AI workflow for the detection and screening of cardiac amyloidosis across a wide range of patients from an international cohort of geographically distinct healthcare systems. In this setting, we found EchoNet-LVH had strong performance in identifying patients with CA of all subtypes, and its performance was consistent across sites, ultrasound manufacturers, and patient characteristics. A few things are worth considering in evaluating our algorithm. Because increased wall thickness is a hallmark of CA 1 , 23 , our algorithm automated the approach to precisely measuring wall thickness as well as integrated this precise measurement with more ‘black box’ features of motion and texture assessed in the apical-4-chamber view. Our approach homes to minimize or exclude confounders 13 , as our models were trained on controls matched on wall-thickness and limit the potential of AI models to shortcut on wall thickness alone. Second, our approach sought to maximize positive predictive value in the downstream testing of CA. In a rare disease, PPV is significantly impacted by model specificity (as the number of false positives are likely to outweigh the number of potential true positives). In the algorithm development, we optimized for specificity as to minimize the number of false positives rejected in downstream testing. A few limitations are worth considering as further study is still warranted. Prospective trialing of CA screening approaches has not yet completed. There is incomplete data on the true population prevalence of CA 3 – 5 , 24 , which significantly impacts the PPV of any algorithm. Multiple other measurements and approaches have been suggested to screen for CA 25 – 27 , however our results represent one of the few fully automated pipelines. Additionally, other work has assessed the performance of EchoNet-LVH in comparison to score-based decision aids and EHR-based algorithms and show EchoNet-LVH’s superior performance 27 . Furthermore, there is significant observer variability in most echocardiographic measurements 28 , which limit the precision of approaches based on routine echo measurements alone 8 . In this study comparing CA patients with patients who were referred for pyrophosphate scintigraphy but had CA ruled out, we demonstrate that IVSd/GLS can be used to identify CA in a population with high clinical suspicion for CA. This ratio has superior performance compared to individual echocardiographic measurements as well as other ratios that are already abnormal in patients at high suspicion for CA. If validated in future studies, incorporation of this easily obtainable measurement can assist with earlier diagnosis of CA resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors Disclosures This work is funded by NIH NHLBI grants R00HL157421, R01HL173526, and R01HL173487 to DO, and a grant from Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Disease. GD is currently an employee of Meta. D.O. reports consulting fees and/or equity in Ultromics, InVision, EchoIQ, and Pfizer. R.K. reports support from NIH NHLBI (R01HL167858 and K23HL153775), NIH NIA (R01AG089981), and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2022060). He is an Associate Editor of JAMA and receives research support, through Yale, from the Blavatnik Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, and BridgeBio. He is a coinventor of Pending Patent Applications WO2023230345A1, US20220336048A1, 63/346,610, 63/484,426, 63/508,315, 63/580,137, 63/606,203, 63/619,241, and 63/562,335, and a co-founder of Ensight-AI, Inc and Evidence2Health, LLC. E.K.O. is supported through NIH NHLBI (F32HL170592). He is a co-founder of Evidence2Health LLC, an ad hoc consultant for Caristo Diagnostics Ltd and Ensight-AI Inc, and has received royalty fees from technology licensed through the University of Oxford, outside this work. FSA has received research support from Pfizer and Atman Health. All other authors declare no competing interests. Footnotes Add authors involved in external validation REFERENCES 1. ↵ Writing Committee et al . 2023 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on comprehensive multidisciplinary care for the patient with cardiac amyloidosis: A report of the American college of cardiology solution set oversight committee . J. Am. Coll. Cardiol . 81 , 1076 – 1126 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Kittleson , M. M. et al. Cardiac Amyloidosis: Evolving Diagnosis and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association . Circulation 142 , e7 – e22 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Kim , H. M. Sohn , D.-W. & Paeng , J. C. Prevalence of Positive 99 mTc-DPD Scintigraphy as an Indicator of the Prevalence of Wild-type Transthyretin Amyloidosis in the Elderly . Int. Heart J . 60 , 643 – 647 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 4. Quock , T. P. , Yan , T. , Chang , E. , Guthrie , S. & Broder , M. S. Epidemiology of AL amyloidosis: a real-world study using US claims data . Blood Advances 2 , 1046 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 5. ↵ Treglia , G. et al. Prevalence of Incidental Findings Suspicious for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis among Patients Undergoing Bone Scintigraphy: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis . J. Clin. Med. Res . 12 , ( 2023 ). 6. ↵ Lee , G. Y. et al. Cardiac amyloidosis without increased left ventricular wall thickness . Mayo Clin. Proc . 89 , 781 – 789 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. Cipriani , A. et al. Low QRS voltages in cardiac amyloidosis: Clinical correlates and prognostic value . JACC CardioOncol . 4 , 458 – 470 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 8. ↵ Cotella , J. et al. Limitations of Apical Sparing Pattern in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Multicenter Echocardiographic Study . Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae021 . OpenUrl CrossRef 9. ↵ Ichikawa , Y. et al. Impact of tafamidis on echocardiographic cardiac function of patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis . Circ. J . 87 , 508 – 516 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 10. Maurer , M. S. et al. Tafamidis Treatment for Patients with Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy . N. Engl. J. Med . 379 , 1007 – 1016 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Fontana , M. et al. Vutrisiran in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy . N. Engl. J. Med . ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409134 . OpenUrl CrossRef 12. ↵ Goto , S. et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled fully automated detection of cardiac amyloidosis using electrocardiograms and echocardiograms . Nat. Commun . 12 , 2726 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 13. ↵ Duffy , G. et al. High-Throughput Precision Phenotyping of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy with Cardiovascular Deep Learning . arXiv [eess.IV] ( 2021 ). 14. ↵ Sangha , V. , Oikonomou , E. K. & Khera , R. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiographic Images for Scalable Screening of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy . medRxiv ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1101/2024.09.30.24314651 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 15. ↵ Omori , H. et al. Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-based angiography-derived non-hyperemic pressure ratio using pressure wire as reference . Circ. J . ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0593 . OpenUrl CrossRef 16. Omori , H. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based angiography-derived fractional flow reserve using pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve as a reference . Circ. J . 87 , 783 – 790 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Yamamoto , T. et al. Enhanced plaque stabilization effects of alirocumab - insights from artificial intelligence-aided optical coherence tomography analysis of the alirocumab for thin-cap fibroatheroma in patients with coronary artery disease estimated by optical coherence tomography (ALTAIR) study . Circ. J . 88 , 1809 – 1818 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 18. Holste , G. et al. Severe aortic stenosis detection by deep learning applied to echocardiography . Eur. Heart J . ( 2023 ) doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad456 . OpenUrl CrossRef 19. ↵ Pirruccello , J. P. et al. Analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 36,000 individuals yields genetic insights into dilated cardiomyopathy . Nat. Commun . 11 , ( 2020 ). 20. ↵ Vrudhula , A. et al. High throughput deep learning detection of mitral regurgitation . bioRxiv ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1101/2024.02.08.24302547 . OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Vukadinovic , M. et al. EchoPrime: A multi-video view-informed vision-language model for comprehensive echocardiography interpretation . arXiv [cs.CV] ( 2024 ). 22. ↵ Akerman Ashley P. et al. Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Artificial Intelligence . JACC: Advances 2 , 100452 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 23. ↵ Pagourelias , E. D. et al. Echo Parameters for Differential Diagnosis in Cardiac Amyloidosis . Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 10 , e005588 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 24. ↵ Gilstrap , L. G. et al. Epidemiology of Cardiac Amyloidosis–Associated Heart Failure Hospitalizations Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States . Circ. Heart Fail . 12 , e005407 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Huda , A. et al. A machine learning model for identifying patients at risk for wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy . Nat. Commun . 12 , 2725 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 26. Davies , D. R. et al. A Simple Score to Identify Increased Risk of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction . JAMA Cardiol 7 , 1036 – 1044 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 27. ↵ Hourmozdi , J. et al. Evaluating the performance and potential bias of predictive models for the detection of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis . medRxiv 2024.10.09.24315202 ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1101/2024.10.09.24315202 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 28. ↵ Pillai , B. , Salerno , M. , Schnittger , I. , Cheng , S. & Ouyang , D. Precision of echocardiographic measurements . J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr . ( 2024 ) doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.01.001 . OpenUrl CrossRef View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted December 17, 2024. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm Grant Duffy , Evangelos K. Oikonomou , Jonathan Hourmozdi , Hiroki Usuku , Jigesh Patel , Yoshinori Katsumata , Wakako Yamasawa , Lily Stern , Shinichi Goto , Kenichi Tsujita , Rohan Khera , Faraz S. Ahmad , David Ouyang medRxiv 2024.12.14.24319049; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.14.24319049 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools International Validation of Echocardiographic AI Amyloid Detection Algorithm Grant Duffy , Evangelos K. Oikonomou , Jonathan Hourmozdi , Hiroki Usuku , Jigesh Patel , Yoshinori Katsumata , Wakako Yamasawa , Lily Stern , Shinichi Goto , Kenichi Tsujita , Rohan Khera , Faraz S. Ahmad , David Ouyang medRxiv 2024.12.14.24319049; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.14.24319049 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cardiovascular Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (573) Allergy and Immunology (865) Anesthesia (302) Cardiovascular Medicine (4453) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (383) Emergency Medicine (609) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1515) Epidemiology (15242) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1131) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6615) Geriatric Medicine (669) Health Economics (1001) Health Informatics (4552) Health Policy (1372) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1614) Hematology (543) HIV/AIDS (1270) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15929) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1106) Medical Education (624) Medical Ethics (147) Nephrology (670) Neurology (6625) Nursing (346) Nutrition (999) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1148) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3344) Ophthalmology (979) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (421) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (665) Pediatrics (1696) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (693) Primary Care Research (714) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5461) Public and Global Health (9252) Radiology and Imaging (2207) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1371) Respiratory Medicine (1197) Rheumatology (597) Sexual and Reproductive Health (715) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (714) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a02e13d06b7e8650',t:'MTc3OTk3OTg4Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00