Abstract
1) Insect decline is threatening ecosystem stability, making information about foraging preferences of pollinators a vital information to acquire. A powerful emerging tool to study pollinator foraging behavior is pollen-metabarcoding. This usually involves lethal sampling of insects. 2) Here, we propose a new, non-lethal way of sampling DNA for the analysis of pollen loads of bumble bees as well as the pollinator. The new methodology does not significantly harm the insect and is easy to implement in a wide range of study designs. The tool is cheap and easy to acquire, can easily be used in the field, and has the potential to become a powerful tool in studying plant-pollinator interactions. 3) To test its feasibility, plant-pollinator networks were analyzed using metabarcoding of the ITS2 region. Plants flowering at the time of collection were also recorded as a reference comparison. 4) Bumble bees with ambiguous morphology were additionally identified based on COI barcoding. 5) With the workflow developed here it is possible to gain knowledge about plants and their pollinators in a non-lethal way without reducing population sizes. This makes this method particularly suitable for endangered and protected species.
Full text
795 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Preprint
ARPHA Preprints
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e133705 (02 Aug 2024)
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e133705 (02 Aug 2024)
Other versions:
- Preprint InfoPreprint Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- CitedCited
ARPHA Preprints
doi:
10.3897/arphapreprints.e133705
First posted
02 Aug 2024
Authors
Alexander Edwards
- Corresponding author
Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany
Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.