Relative High Fitness and Genome-wide Diversity May Facilitate Plastic and Active Foragers' Diversification

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Explaining the variation in diversification rates across the Tree of Life is an important challenge for evolutionary biologists. Growing evidence suggests that key innovations or historical contingency give rise to high diversification rates, but the genetic mechanisms through which this process may occur remain poorly investigated. Based on fitness landscapes, a high diversification is predicted to result from local adaptation as species traverse along genotype space. To test this prediction, we conducted a comparative analysis of 997 reptile species that vary in their locomotion while foraging. The species ranged from those that travel long distances to acquire food to those that barely move and acquire food in nearby sites or those that adopt a plastic strategy. We found that plastic foragers and active foragers not only have high diversification rates but may also have higher fitness compared to sit-and-wait foragers. While traversing among heterogeneous environments, plastic foragers and active foragers could accelerate the pace of evolution by exposing cryptic genetic variation to selection. This is possible in plastic foragers because their larger genomes potentially facilitate variation in gene expression. By contrast, higher genome-wide nucleotide diversity among active foragers could make up for the small size of their genomes, allowing natural selection to operate effectively to the point where divergence by ecological speciation could occur. We used emerging genomic data and macroevolutionary observations supported by microevolutionary processes to provide key insights into mechanisms of diversification.
Full text 2,817 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Explaining variation in diversification of species across the Tree of Life is an important challenge for evolutionary biologists. Growing evidence suggests that key innovations or historical contingency give rise to high diversification of species, but the genetic mechanisms through which this process may occur remain poorly investigated. Based on fitness landscapes, a high diversification is predicted to result from local adaptation as species navigate genotype space. To test this prediction, we conducted a comparative analysis of 997 reptile species that vary in their locomotion while foraging. The species ranged from those that travel long distances to acquire food (''active foragers'') to those that barely move and acquire food in nearby sites (''sit-and-wait foragers''), or those that adopt a plastic strategy. We found that active and plastic foragers not only have higher diversification of species but also have higher fitness compared to sit-and-wait foragers. While traversing across heterogeneous environments, active and plastic foragers could accelerate the pace of evolution by exposing cryptic genetic variation to selection. This is possible in active and plastic foragers because their larger genomes and nucleotide diversity potentially facilitate variation in gene expression, allowing natural selection to operate effectively to the point where divergence by ecological speciation could occur. Restricted locomotion among sit-and-wait foragers potentially led to relatively low diversification of species via stochastic processes. We used emerging genomic data and macroevolutionary observations supported by microevolutionary processes to provide key insights into mechanisms of diversification. https://doi.org/10.32942/X26D3R Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences genetic diversity, genome size, foraging mode, reproductive effort Published: 2025-06-03 19:08 Last Updated: 2025-11-15 15:33 CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: The authors have declared no competing interests. Data and Code Availability Statement: A fully reproducible workflow of the data analyses, including R scripts and additional supporting material, is available in the following repositories: Github https://dylan-padilla.github.io/speciation-foraging/. A dryad link will be available upon acceptance. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00