Agroforestry reshapes soil bacterial communities to enhance Ricinus communis oil quality and bioactivity over monocropping: comparative metagenomics and culture-dependent insights

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

An agroforestry (AF) system improves crop quality, ecosystem services, and microbial resilience, but its effects on oilseed bioactivity and soil microbiomes are still underexplored. This study compared AF and monocropping systems for castor ( Ricinus communis L.) grown in Rajasthan, India, to evaluate plant productivity, seed oil composition, antimicrobial properties, and soil bacterial communities. AF enhanced seed morphology and germination. Castor oil from agroforestry had a 2.4-fold higher phenolic content, 2% more ricinoleic acid, and lower levels of oleic and linoleic acids compared to monocropping, confirmed by infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography, along with increased expression of the RcDGAT2 gene involved in fatty acid biosynthesis. This led to improved antimicrobial activity against Bacillus mobilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens . Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Nanopore platform identified 17 bacterial phyla in soil microbiomes, with Proteobacteria and Firmicutes as the dominant phyla. While alpha diversity was similar, AF soils showed distinct taxonomic shifts, enriching bacteria such as Alkalimonas , Aureimonas , Blastopirellula , Glutamicibacter , Rhizobium , Rhizomicrobium , and Rhodovulum , linked to nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion. Isolated rhizospheric/root endophytic Bacillus safensis and Enterobacter cloacae from AF castor exhibited plant growth-promoting traits via biochemical tests and whole-genome sequencing; their oil biosynthesis genes likely contribute to host oil quality by enhancing precursor supply and phenolic pathways. These isolates enhanced the growth of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana . In summary, AF enhances the bioactivity of castor oil and microbial functions by modulating plant-soil-microbe interactions, thereby supporting sustainable crop quality and soil health.
Full text 1,946 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract An agroforestry (AF) system improves crop quality, ecosystem services, and microbial resilience, but its effects on oilseed bioactivity and soil microbiomes are still underexplored. This study compared AF and monocropping systems for castor (Ricinus communis L.) grown in Rajasthan, India, to evaluate plant productivity, seed oil composition, antimicrobial properties, and soil bacterial communities. AF enhanced seed morphology and germination. Castor oil from agroforestry had a 2.4-fold higher phenolic content, 2% more ricinoleic acid, and lower levels of oleic and linoleic acids compared to monocropping, confirmed by infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography, along with increased expression of the RcDGAT2 gene involved in fatty acid biosynthesis. This led to improved antimicrobial activity against Bacillus mobilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Nanopore platform identified 17 bacterial phyla in soil microbiomes, with Proteobacteria and Firmicutes as the dominant phyla. While alpha diversity was similar, AF soils showed distinct taxonomic shifts, enriching bacteria such as Alkalimonas, Aureimonas, Blastopirellula, Glutamicibacter, Rhizobium, Rhizomicrobium, and Rhodovulum, linked to nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion. Isolated rhizospheric/root endophytic Bacillus safensis and Enterobacter cloacae from AF castor exhibited plant growth-promoting traits via biochemical tests and whole-genome sequencing; their oil biosynthesis genes likely contribute to host oil quality by enhancing precursor supply and phenolic pathways. These isolates enhanced the growth of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In summary, AF enhances the bioactivity of castor oil and microbial functions by modulating plant-soil-microbe interactions, thereby supporting sustainable crop quality and soil health. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00