[Isolated microhematuria: biopsy, yes or no?]
review
public-domain-us
Abstract
Isolated asymptomatic hematuria is frequently encountered in clinical practice but there are no established recommendations for its evaluation and management. There is controversy regarding which tests are necessary and whether renal biopsy is indicated. In the pediatric population, renal biopsy should be considered if there is evidence of progressive renal disease or when parents are worried about their child's diagnosis or prognosis. In adults, examinations for isolated microhematuria should include exclusion of pharmacological causes, journeys to endemic areas for S. haematobium or tuberculosis, sickle-cell disease, endometriosis and, in patients older than 40 years, kidney, ureteral or bladder cancer. Examination of urinary sediment may help in identifying the origin of microhematuria. If it is decided to perform a renal biopsy, the patient should be carefully informed of the possible complications of renal biopsy, including the possibility of finding normal renal tissue.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-10T06:07:26.400732+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:07.008521+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine