PET Granules Replacement for Fine Aggregate in Concrete and FRP Wrapping Effect: Overview of Experimental Data and Model Development
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
In this study, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was substituted for concrete at 10%, 20%, and 30% of the sand volume. Compressive, splitting tensile and flexural strength tests were applied to concrete samples and stress-strain graphs were obtained. It was observed that PET substitution caused a decrease in the mechanical properties of the concrete. For this reason, the concrete with the best PET substitution rate was reinforced by wrapping it with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), and the same experiments were repeated. It was observed that the damage caused by PET substitution could be compensated by the wrapping. In addition, this study provides a comprehensive database by bringing together experimental data from studies in which PET was substituted by volume or weight instead of fine aggregate in concrete. Based on the experimental results and literature data, model suggestions for PET-substituted concrete were made. The models proposed in this study, along with previous models, were tested for applicability. Similarly, the model suggestions in the literature for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined concrete were tested with the experimental data in this study, and their suitability for PET-substituted concrete was discussed.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00