Ecosystem condition assessments: A context-specific workflow to integrate local expert knowledge and remote sensing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,505 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Despite decades of conservation science, we still struggle with a deceptively simple question: how do we know if an ecosystem is in good or poor condition? We present a reproducible, six-step workflow for assessing ecosystem condition using remote sensing, ecological knowledge, and expert validation. The approach is designed to be applied consistently across diverse biomes, while remaining sensitive to ecosystem-specific dynamics. It suggests steps for the detection of gradual changes in ecosystem condition driven by key pressures such as livestock farming and ranching, invasive species, or altered disturbance regimes, that traditional land cover classifications may miss. We demonstrate the workflow in Albany Thicket vegetation (South Africa) using high-dimensional satellite embeddings and a deviation-from-reference approach, capturing spatial gradients in ecosystem condition consistent with known degradation patterns and enabling continuous mapping for conservation and restoration planning and prioritization. By integrating expert input with scalable remote sensing metrics, the workflow provides ecologically meaningful and policy-relevant outputs. Importantly, it is aligned with both the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems and UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting, thereby bridging two global standards and supporting national reporting towards the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and Land Degradation Neutrality targets. This operational framework offers a transparent, adaptable, locally relevant and globally comparable approach for assessing ecosystem condition along a continuum of change, strengthening the evidence base for conservation, restoration, and emerging biodiversity markets. https://doi.org/10.32942/X29W9S Life Sciences ecological condition, degradation detection, ecosystem accounting, ecosystem condition, ecosystem condition mapping, expert knowledge, Red List of Ecosystems, remote sensing Published: 2026-04-17 17:23 Last Updated: 2026-04-17 17:23 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00