An Interesting Case of Sister Mary Joseph's Nodule Revealed by 18F-FDG PET

Case report OA: gold CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 ⓘ

A case report describes a 61-year-old woman with rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma presenting as a Sister Mary Joseph's nodule, identified via 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging alongside widespread metastases.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report describes the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in identifying a Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule, which serves as a cutaneous metastasis from an underlying intra-abdominal malignancy. The authors detail the clinical presentation and imaging findings that led to the discovery of the primary cancer source through this specific radiological sign. No major limitations are explicitly stated beyond the inherent constraints of a single case study design. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The Sister Mary Joseph's nodule is a rare umbilical metastatic lesion, occurring in 1%-3% of abdominopelvic adenocarcinomas. It represents the visible tip of the iceberg, and its presence is associated with a poor prognosis. We report the case of a 61-year-old postmenopausal female patient with rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET) scan revealed, in addition to a large sigmoid mass, multiple hypermetabolic lumbo-aortic lymphadenopathies, secondary hypermetabolic pulmonary and hepatic nodules, and a large subcutaneous umbilical nodule consistent with a Sister Marie Joseph's nodule. This case supports the systematic use of 18F-FDG PET in oncologic evaluations involving suspicious umbilical nodules.
Full text 594 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 3 sections · click to expand

Authorship

S. O. N. Design: S. O. N., O. A. S., Y. B., A. D., Data Collection or Processing: S. N. O., Analysis or Interpretation: S. N. O, A. D., Literature Search: S. N. O, O. A. S, Writing: S. N. O.

Declaration

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Coi Statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:51:55.209427+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0