Does the Current Expected Credit Loss Approach Decrease the Procyclicality of Banks’ Lending? Evidence from the COVID-19 Recession

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

In the wake of the financial crisis, policymakers expressed the concern that banks’ use of the incurred loss model exacerbates their lending procyclicality by delaying the loan loss recognition to recessions. Responding to this concern, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, which requires large public banks to accrue for loan losses using the current expected credit loss (CECL) approach starting in 2020. Contrary to this concern, we hypothesize and find that banks that adopted CECL prior to the COVID-19 pandemic increased loan loss provisions and reduced loan growth during the accompanying recession more than other banks. The procyclical contraction of lending is stronger for adopting banks with low regulatory capital and low initial CECL adoption impacts and is primarily driven by commercial loans. Lastly, we find that counties for which CECL-adopting banks have higher market share experience larger increases in unemployment rates during the recession and slower subsequent recoveries.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00