After superovulation-intrauterine insemination fails: the prognosis for treatment by gamete intrafallopian transfer/pronuclear stage transfer

Deirdre Robinson; Craig H. Syrop; Diane G. Hammitt

doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54908-5

After superovulation-intrauterine insemination fails: the prognosis for treatment by gamete intrafallopian transfer/pronuclear stage transfer

Deirdre Robinson, Craig H. Syrop, Diane G. Hammitt

In: Fertility and Sterility · 1992 · vol. 57(3) , pp. 606–612 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54908-5 · PMID:1740206 · W55607995

article OA: closed CC0

View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This paper examined the success rates of gamete intrafallopian transfer or pronuclear stage transfer following failed superovulation-intrauterine insemination treatments.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the prognosis for gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT)/pronuclear stage transfer (PROST) treatment after prior superovulation-intrauterine insemination (IUI).DesignMatched, retrospective.SettingOutpatient university endocrine-infertility program.Patients, participantsOne hundred forty-four women matched for infertility factors and age were studied according to the following three treatment groups: superovulation-IUI only, GIFT/PROST only, or GIFT/PROST after superovulation-IUI.Main outcome measuresPer cycle and cumulative pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared utilizing life table analysis.ResultsCumulative PRs (0.408) for superovulation-IUI only were lower than initial (0.469) and cumulative (0.802) cycle fecundity of GIFT/PROST (P = 0.002). Per cycle and cumulative PRs did not differ between GIFT/PROST only versus GIFT/PROST after superovulation-IUI.ConclusionsGamete intrafallopian transfer/PROST may be cost-effective when compared with superovulation-IUI. The prognosis for GIFT/PROST success is not negatively affected by earlier superovulation-IUI treatment failure.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (26)

Intrauterine insemination and ovulation stimulation as treatment of infertility. via openalex
Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates via openalex
The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54168-5 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59543-0 via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136917 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60136-x via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60073-0 via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137012 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54050-3 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60129-2 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59414-x via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59052-9 via openalex
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137226 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44120-8 via openalex
W6712571445 via openalex
W6715286291 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59472-2 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59583-1 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59825-2 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0020-7292(92)90995-u via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54111-9 via openalex
doi:10.1007/bf01139186 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48969-7 via openalex
doi:10.1016/0020-7292(88)90288-3 via openalex

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-05-14T06:20:47.804276+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK

[1] The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. 1990

[2] Intrauterine insemination and ovulation stimulation as treatment of infertility. 1989

[3] Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates 1988