Abstract
Objective COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted migrant workers in meat processing industries causing mass outbreaks and fatalities. Implementing community based participatory research (CBPR) methods may increase public health engagement, but developing the prerequisite trust required is hindered during a public health crisis.
Methods
We used CBPR methods to recruit, train and integrate six community scholars representing various racialized ethnocultural minorities into public health research and outreach operations. We present an organizational case study of their experiences across multiple Canadian meat plants affected by mass COVID-19 outbreaks. We used administrative documents to describe the project setting, training, and roles across research and vaccine operations between March 2020 and December 2022. Scholars then completed reflexivity activities using narrative analysis to summarize their experiences and impacts on themselves, migrant workers, and their communities. Finally, we integrated our data through scholars’ reflections to investigate how their narrative analysis was reflected in the administrative, quantitative and time series data.
Findings We summarize three study phases; 1) Scholars’ recruitment and training; 2) early community engagement; 3) community outreach vaccinations. After Scholars’ team integration, initial worker study recruitment attempts failed due to mistrust and fear of employer reprisals. Scholars built trust among workers playing key roles in nine onsite meat plant occupational and community outreach COVID-19 vaccine clinics. successfully surveyed 191, and interviewed 43 workers in seven primary languages across eleven meat plants between January 2021 and February 2022. Scholars described their roles, successful outreach strategies, learnings, prerequisite skills, and intimate interactions that contributed motivation and meaning. Key insights included empathetically validating workers’ experiences, translating stories into advocacy, and the importance of community presence combining public health research and outreach.
Conclusion
During public health crises, community-academic-healthcare partnerships can rapidly implement multicultural CBPR strategies to effectively engage migrant workers concurrently in both research and public health outreach.
Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR Application no. 469206)
What is already known on this topic?The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted migrant workers in meat processing industries, leading to significant outbreaks, poor health outcomes, and fatalities across multiple high-income countries. Existing literature highlights the challenges of engaging these workers in public health research and outreach operations due to structural barriers, precarious economic and immigration statuses, and mistrust towards health authorities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods can overcome these barriers; however, they fundamentally depend on developing trust between academic and healthcare partners and migrant workers, which is very difficult during public health crises such as mass COVID-19 outbreaks in meat processing facilities.
What this study adds?This study introduces and evaluates a novel, rapidly developed community-based participatory research (CBPR) program that integrated six community leaders called ‘Community Scholars,’ representing various racialized ethnocultural minorities, into public health research and outreach operations concurrently. It details how community scholars were trained and integrated into teams to engage migrant workers in research and vaccine outreach operations. The study outlines the program’s failures, successes, reflections, and key learnings, to overcome traditional participation barriers.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy?These findings suggest that employing CBPR methods rapidly with active community involvement can synergistically enhance engagement and trust among migrant workers across both public health research and operations. This study provides insights that may serve as a blueprint for similar contexts, informing future public health strategies and policies to better manage crises involving socially vulnerable migrant populations. It emphasizes the potential of community-driven approaches to bridge gaps in public health research, practice and policy, particularly during emergencies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded through the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR Application no. 469206)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the University of Calgary research ethics board (REB20-1153)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.