Kinetic Insights and Process Selection for Electrochemical Remediation of Industrial Dye Effluents Using Mixed Electrode Systems
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
The discharge of dye-laden effluents remains an environmental challenge since conventional treatments remove color but not the organic load. This study systematically compared anodic oxidation (AO), electro-Fenton (EF), and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF) processes for three representative industrial dyes, such as Coriasol Red CB, Brown RBH, and Blue VT, and their ternary mixture, using boron-doped diamond (BDD) and Ti/IrO₂–SnO₂–Sb₂O₅ (MMO) anodes. Experiments were conducted in a batch reactor with 50 mM Na₂SO₄ at pH =3.0 and current densities of 20–60 mA cm⁻². Kinetic analysis showed that AO-BDD was most effective at low pollutant loads, EF-BDD became superior at medium loads due to efficient H₂O₂ electrogeneration, and PEF-MMO dominated at higher loads by fast UVA photolysis of surface Fe(OH)²⁺ complexes. In a ternary mixture of 120 mg L⁻¹ of dyes, EF-BDD and PEF-MMO achieved >98 % decolorization in 22–23 min with pseudo-first order rate constants of 0.111–0.136 min⁻¹, whereas AO processes remained slower. COD assays revealed partial mineralization of 60–80 %, with EF-BDD providing the most consistent reduction and PEF-MMO minimizing treatment time. These findings confirm that decolorization overestimates efficiency, and electrode selection must be tailored to dye structure and effluent composition. Process-selection rules allow concluding that EF-BDD is the best robust dark option, and PEF-MMO, when UVA is available, offers practical guidelines for cost-effective electrochemical treatment of textile wastewater.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00