A Unique Phage DUF669 Protein mediates Post-cleavage Repair Against Host CRISPR Immunity

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The paper studied a phage-encoded counter-CRISPR system called Healer, using mechanistic analyses of two proteins (Gp63, containing a DUF669 domain, and Gp64, containing an AAA domain) during CRISPR-Cas–mediated DNA cleavage. The key finding is that Gp63 rapidly responds to CRISPR-induced DNA breaks by binding single-stranded DNA and, together with Gp64, enables homologous recombination–based post-cleavage repair of phage DNA, allowing phage survival. A further result showed that co-expressing Healer with CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12 increased phage genome-editing efficiency in multiple bacterial species (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii), with the explicit caveat that the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Phages have evolved various anti-CRISPR(Acr) proteins evade hosts’ immunity by direct CRISPR interference. However, whether other counter-CRISPR mechanisms exist remains unexplored. Here, we report a phage-encoded two-protein system, Healer, which neutralizes CRISPR immunity via a post-cleavage DNA repair mechanism. This phage replication-associated system comprises two proteins: Gp63 (a DUF669 domain-containing protein), and Gp64 (a AAA domain). Mechanistic investigations elucidate that Gp63 acts as a rapid-response effector of CRISPR-induced DNA break, following the binding of ssDNA allows the Gp64 to mediate homologous recombination, repairing CRISPR-induced phage DNA break and enabling phage survival. Notably, co-expression Healer system with CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12 in E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, demonstrated higher phage genome-editing efficiency. Conclusively, our findings represent a vital anti-CRISPR complementary strategy, providing a promising tool for genome manipulation.
Full text 13,462 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Unique Phage DUF669 Protein mediates Post-cleavage Repair Against Host CRISPR Immunity | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article A Unique Phage DUF669 Protein mediates Post-cleavage Repair Against Host CRISPR Immunity Yingfei Ma, Heng zhu, Shengkun Dai, Hewen Deng, Shifeng Hou, Yuelong Li, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Phages have evolved various anti-CRISPR(Acr) proteins evade hosts’ immunity by direct CRISPR interference. However, whether other counter-CRISPR mechanisms exist remains unexplored. Here, we report a phage-encoded two-protein system, Healer, which neutralizes CRISPR immunity via a post-cleavage DNA repair mechanism. This phage replication-associated system comprises two proteins: Gp63 (a DUF669 domain-containing protein), and Gp64 (a AAA domain). Mechanistic investigations elucidate that Gp63 acts as a rapid-response effector of CRISPR-induced DNA break, following the binding of ssDNA allows the Gp64 to mediate homologous recombination, repairing CRISPR-induced phage DNA break and enabling phage survival. Notably, co-expression Healer system with CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12 in E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, demonstrated higher phage genome-editing efficiency. Conclusively, our findings represent a vital anti-CRISPR complementary strategy, providing a promising tool for genome manipulation. Biological sciences/Microbiology/Virology Biological sciences/Molecular biology/DNA damage and repair Phage counter-defense Homologous recombination DUF669 domain Single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) CRISPR-Cas immunity Genome editing Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files extendeddata.rar The original files predicted by AlphaFold 3 and the phage sequences supplementaryvideoS1.gif The complex structure of Csy-dsDNA-Gp63 predicted by AlphaFold3 Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8337580","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":568906813,"identity":"cf479a4a-e46b-4c13-ad33-6425b8382318","order_by":0,"name":"Yingfei Ma","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2563-5390","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yingfei","middleName":"","lastName":"Ma","suffix":""},{"id":568906814,"identity":"aa022776-f0fd-41ad-8bbf-79820c68f133","order_by":1,"name":"Heng zhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Heng","middleName":"","lastName":"zhu","suffix":""},{"id":568906815,"identity":"c9dc975f-88c6-47b3-8553-0abd02e9b288","order_by":2,"name":"Shengkun Dai","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-7053","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shengkun","middleName":"","lastName":"Dai","suffix":""},{"id":568906816,"identity":"2436e94e-c548-45f0-8656-f266e524ba1f","order_by":3,"name":"Hewen Deng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hewen","middleName":"","lastName":"Deng","suffix":""},{"id":568906817,"identity":"156b2a05-49fb-4b05-90d5-108f56f53fbd","order_by":4,"name":"Shifeng Hou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shifeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Hou","suffix":""},{"id":568906818,"identity":"d51cfc18-4323-481a-b679-25e1f4751a91","order_by":5,"name":"Yuelong Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Southern University of Science and Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuelong","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":568906819,"identity":"20056477-5aba-4cc4-88e4-984638461768","order_by":6,"name":"Xin Tan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xin","middleName":"","lastName":"Tan","suffix":""},{"id":568906820,"identity":"7641bb82-9be5-4983-99ab-fde18c6329e5","order_by":7,"name":"Ning Jia","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-454X","institution":"Southern University of Science and Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ning","middleName":"","lastName":"Jia","suffix":""},{"id":568906821,"identity":"a6fd3df7-4ce6-40f7-b923-fc1d399da957","order_by":8,"name":"Nan Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nan","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-11 14:22:02","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":100746969,"identity":"ffc0df0e-dbf1-4418-92ee-bf7de84edc4b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 03:45:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4089804,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8337580/v1_covered_92fec9eb-aac0-48f3-b397-77db0a968472.pdf"},{"id":100746923,"identity":"13b7db7e-a7cd-45e9-ab41-764a7df3d492","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 03:45:35","extension":"rar","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":4003531,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The original files predicted by AlphaFold 3 and the phage sequences","description":"","filename":"extendeddata.rar","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8337580/v1/b5b1e777e3840f136789594c.rar"},{"id":100746906,"identity":"3e720e1c-09e0-426a-ae12-8965c81ba79e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-21 03:45:28","extension":"gif","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":68166330,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"The complex structure of Csy-dsDNA-Gp63 predicted by AlphaFold3","description":"","filename":"supplementaryvideoS1.gif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8337580/v1/107e4948b5c6deeaef3deda0.gif"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"A Unique Phage DUF669 Protein mediates Post-cleavage Repair Against Host CRISPR Immunity","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Phage counter-defense, Homologous recombination, DUF669 domain, Single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB), CRISPR-Cas immunity, Genome editing","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Phages have evolved various anti-CRISPR(Acr) proteins evade hosts’ immunity by direct CRISPR interference. However, whether other counter-CRISPR mechanisms exist remains unexplored. Here, we report a phage-encoded two-protein system, Healer, which neutralizes CRISPR immunity via a post-cleavage DNA repair mechanism. This phage replication-associated system comprises two proteins: Gp63 (a DUF669 domain-containing protein), and Gp64 (a AAA domain). Mechanistic investigations elucidate that Gp63 acts as a rapid-response effector of CRISPR-induced DNA break, following the binding of ssDNA allows the Gp64 to mediate homologous recombination, repairing CRISPR-induced phage DNA break and enabling phage survival. Notably, co-expression Healer system with CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12 in E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, demonstrated higher phage genome-editing efficiency. Conclusively, our findings represent a vital anti-CRISPR complementary strategy, providing a promising tool for genome manipulation.","manuscriptTitle":"A Unique Phage DUF669 Protein mediates Post-cleavage Repair Against Host CRISPR Immunity","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-21 03:45:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8337580/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-communications","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"NCOMMS","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Communications](http://www.nature.com/ncomms/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ncomms.nature.com/","title":"Nature Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Communications","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"642c0a0e-e433-4075-be2b-ec771403cac4","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 21st, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":60534184,"name":"Biological sciences/Microbiology/Virology"},{"id":60534185,"name":"Biological sciences/Molecular biology/DNA damage and repair"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-21T03:45:03+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-21 03:45:03","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8337580","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8337580","identity":"rs-8337580","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00