Automated and Simulation-Guided Multiplexed DNA-PAINT for Nanoparticle Characterization

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,754 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Recent advances in lab automation have dramatically increased the throughput of material synthesis, enabling rapid screening of nanomaterials for specific applications in nanotechnology and nanomedicine. However, this progress highlights a key bottleneck: most high-resolution characterization techniques, such as electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and super-resolution microscopy, remain low-throughput and labor-intensive. To keep pace, characterization must evolve toward greater automation and scalability. Here, we present an integrated and automatable workflow for multicolor DNA point accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography (DNA-PAINT) super-resolution microscopy tailored for nanoparticles. Our approach combines kinetic simulations, automated multiplexed imaging, and streamlined image analysis to enable end-to-end automation, from experimental design to quantitative data output. Simulations predict optimal experimental conditions, thus reducing the need for manual optimization. A fluidics system paired with a TIRF microscope is used to automate multiplexed imaging by rounds of imaging and probe exchange (exchange-PAINT) on multiple memorized positions without human oversight during the acquisition process. Finally, an image analysis pipeline tailored for NPs allows for the quantification of nanoparticle size and multiplexed ligand functionalization. This methodology improves the throughput and reproducibility of single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) using DNA-PAINT and lowers the entry barrier for non-expert users, thus paving the way for broader adoption in nanomedicine and materials discovery workflows. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00