DiffDock-Glide: a hybrid physics-based and data-driven approach to molecular docking

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Recent years have seen a rise in applications of deep learning to problems in the molecular sciences. Among them, the diffusion model DiffDock stands out as a method for docking small molecules into protein binding sites. But DiffDock struggles to compete with conventional docking methods, especially for targets outside its training set. We develop a hybrid model called DiffDock-Glide which addresses some shortcomings of deep learning docking methods: it uses a modified generative process to generate samples within a binding pocket and the confidence model is replaced with Glide’s post-docking minimization pipeline. We evaluate DiffDock-Glide on the Posebusters dataset and show improved sampling of near-native poses, especially for sequences without homologues in the training set. We also evaluate DiffDock-Glide’s performance in virtual screening compounds from the DUD-E dataset against receptor structures generated by AlphaFold2 and report enrichment values that broadly surpass those from traditional Glide.
Full text 1,133 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Recent years have seen a rise in applications of deep learning to problems in the molecular sciences. Among them, the diffusion model DiffDock stands out as a method for docking small molecules into protein binding sites. But DiffDock struggles to compete with conventional docking methods, especially for targets outside its training set. We develop a hybrid model called DiffDock-Glide which addresses some shortcomings of deep learning docking methods: it uses a modified generative process to generate samples within a binding pocket and the confidence model is replaced with Glide’s post-docking minimization pipeline. We evaluate DiffDock-Glide on the Posebusters dataset and show improved sampling of near-native poses, especially for sequences without homologues in the training set. We also evaluate DiffDock-Glide’s performance in virtual screening compounds from the DUD-E dataset against receptor structures generated by AlphaFold2 and report enrichment values that broadly surpass those from traditional Glide. Competing Interest Statement Work was completed while Lukas Herron was an intern at Schrodinger Inc.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00