[Endoscopic treatment of pelvic inflamatory disease]

B Baltadzhieva, V Novachkov, A Ilieva, Ana-Marija Ilieva, D Dimitrov
Akusherstvo i ginekologiia · 2006 · vol. 45(2) , pp. 31–3 · PMID:16637301 · W169614993
Other OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-05 ⓘ

This paper compares conservative treatment with minimally invasive surgical treatment for pelvic inflammatory disease, highlighting the advantages of combined therapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The authors present their own attempt of miniinvasive management of pelvic inflammatory disease. Two groups of patients are compared--in the first one the women are treated only conservatively, while the second one has undergone miniinvasive surgical treatment. The preferences of combined therapy are pointed out.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Anti-Bacterial Agents Drainage Endoscopy Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Acute Disease Adult Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Bacterial Agents Appendicitis Appendicitis Chronic Disease Combined Modality Therapy Diagnosis, Differential Endoscopy Female Humans Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:03:44.483075+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK