Micro- and nanoplastic effects on the reproduction of Daphnia spp. - a meta-analysis
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Several traits of micro- and nanoplastic particles (MNPs), including among others, polymer type, size, and shape, have been shown to influence MNP toxicity. The direction and size of these moderating effects are however often unclear and generalizations from single studies are difficult to establish. Meta-analyses, which quantitatively aggregate data on a specific topic, can be used to increase generalizability of results and derive more accurate and precise effect size estimates by combining measurements from published studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of MNP exposure on the reproductive output of water fleas of the genus Daphnia by aggregating 369 data points from 64 published studies. We show that Daphnia individuals exposed to MNP produce on average 13.6 less neonates, which represents a reduction of 20.8% compared to the particle free controls (control mean = 65.37 neonates). This effect is moderated by the particles’ concentration and shape category, exposure duration, experimental temperature, and size category with microplastic particles eliciting a stronger negative effect than nanoplastic particles. Species, age of the test organisms, polymer type, size (as continous), fluorescence, modification type, presence of surfactant and DOM present did not influence effect sizes significantly. Based on the high residual heterogeneity in the data, we suggest that additional factors likely influence observed effects and discuss how a better characterization of particles could improve our understanding of the drivers of MNP toxicity.
Full text
2,184 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Several traits of micro- and nanoplastic particles (MNPs), including among others, polymer type, size, and shape, have been shown to influence MNP toxicity. The direction and size of these moderating effects are however often unclear and generalizations from single studies are difficult to establish. Meta-analyses, which quantitatively aggregate data on a specific topic, can be used to increase generalizability of results and derive more accurate and precise effect size estimates by combining measurements from published studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of MNP exposure on the reproductive output of water fleas of the genus Daphnia by aggregating 369 data points from 64 published studies. We show that Daphnia individuals exposed to MNP produce on average 13.6 less neonates, which represents a reduction of 20.8% compared to the particle free controls (control mean = 65.37 neonates). This effect is moderated by the particles’ concentration and shape category, exposure duration, experimental temperature, and size category with microplastic particles eliciting a stronger negative effect than nanoplastic particles. Species, age of the test organisms, polymer type, size (as continous), fluorescence, modification type, presence of surfactant and DOM present did not influence effect sizes significantly. Based on the high residual heterogeneity in the data, we suggest that additional factors likely influence observed effects and discuss how a better characterization of particles could improve our understanding of the drivers of MNP toxicity.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X26D2C
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
ecotoxicology, nano-plastics, microplastics, offspring, water flea, neonates
Dates
Published: 2025-03-13 15:13
License
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data and code will be made publicly available upon publication.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00