Assessing the Alignment of AI-Generated Evaluations with Human Judgment: A Case Study in an Entrepreneurship Pitch Competition

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Amidst the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications, determining the alignment between AI evaluations and human judgment remains crucial, especially in sectors like finance, healthcare, and education. This study delves into a unique scenario—a teenage entrepreneur pitch competition, mirroring real-world challenges faced by these young innovators. The objective was to assess the congruence between evaluations by ChatGPT, an AI model, and human judges. The results indicate a remarkable alignment between AI and human evaluations across several criteria. The implications of this study are far-reaching, highlighting AI's potential in ensuring unbiased and reliable evaluations in pitch competitions and beyond. However, navigating the juncture of AI and human judgment mandates continued research and ethical considerations.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00