Protected Antimicrobial Use in Nineteen Equine Veterinary Practices in the UK

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: : Antimicrobials essential for human health must be used judiciously. Objectives: Quantify current use and indications for critically important antibiotics (“protected antibiotics”) in general equine practice. Study Design: Prospective descriptive. Methods: : Systemic use of 3 rd generation cephalosporins (ceftiofur), fluroquinolones (enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin), macrolides (clarithromycin), ansamycins (rifampin) and polymyxins (polymyxin B) (classified as “protected antibiotics”) were prospectively recorded in 19 equine practices over a six-month period (April - September 2023). Results: : Protected antibiotics were prescribed to 200 horses with 10 horses prescribed two protected antibiotics concurrently. These included ceftiofur (48.2%), enrofloxacin (34.3%%), marbofloxacin (7.1%), polymyxin B (6.2%), rifampin (2.8%) and clarithromycin (1.4%). The mean number of protected antibiotics prescribed per practice was 10.5 (SD 12.4, range 0-41). The commonest clinical indications were respiratory disease (18.0%), foal septic diseases (16.5%), gastrointestinal diseases (15.0%), complicated wounds (13.5%), “dummy”/premature foals (7.5%) and cellulitis/lymphangitis (6.5%). Of 190 horses prescribed protected antibiotics, 76 (40.0%) were foals (less than 12 months of age). Horse age (foal or adult) was associated with specific antibiotic use (p < 0.001), with 73.7% of ceftiofur prescriptions for foals, and 97.0% and 100% of enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin prescriptions respectively for adults. Horses less than one year of age were less likely to have culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) compared to adults (P < 0.001). Commonest justifications for protected antibiotic use were lack of alternative preparations suitable for foals (27.5%), AST results (24.9%) and failure to respond to previous antibiotic treatment (17.1%). Main Limitations: Convenience sampling with small number of cases. Aminoglycoside use not evaluated. Conclusions: : Respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, complicated wounds and foal infections were the commonest reasons for protected antibiotic use. Lack of alternative drugs (for foals) and C&S results or failed previous treatments were commonest justifications.
Full text 7,549 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Protected Antimicrobial Use in Nineteen Equine Veterinary Practices in the UK | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL Equine Veterinary Education This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 17 December 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Protected Antimicrobial Use in Nineteen Equine Veterinary Practices in the UK Authors : Charlotte Sinclair , Imogen Schofield , H Stone , and Tim Mair 0000-0002-9744-9909 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176598009.93261052/v1 220 views 154 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Background : Antimicrobials essential for human health must be used judiciously. Objectives: Quantify current use and indications for critically important antibiotics (“protected antibiotics”) in general equine practice. Study Design: Prospective descriptive. Methods: Systemic use of 3 rd generation cephalosporins (ceftiofur), fluroquinolones (enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin), macrolides (clarithromycin), ansamycins (rifampin) and polymyxins (polymyxin B) (classified as “protected antibiotics”) were prospectively recorded in 19 equine practices over a six-month period (April - September 2023). Results: Protected antibiotics were prescribed to 200 horses with 10 horses prescribed two protected antibiotics concurrently. These included ceftiofur (48.2%), enrofloxacin (34.3%%), marbofloxacin (7.1%), polymyxin B (6.2%), rifampin (2.8%) and clarithromycin (1.4%). The mean number of protected antibiotics prescribed per practice was 10.5 (SD 12.4, range 0-41). The commonest clinical indications were respiratory disease (18.0%), foal septic diseases (16.5%), gastrointestinal diseases (15.0%), complicated wounds (13.5%), “dummy”/premature foals (7.5%) and cellulitis/lymphangitis (6.5%). Of 190 horses prescribed protected antibiotics, 76 (40.0%) were foals (less than 12 months of age). Horse age (foal or adult) was associated with specific antibiotic use (p < 0.001), with 73.7% of ceftiofur prescriptions for foals, and 97.0% and 100% of enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin prescriptions respectively for adults. Horses less than one year of age were less likely to have culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) compared to adults (P < 0.001). Commonest justifications for protected antibiotic use were lack of alternative preparations suitable for foals (27.5%), AST results (24.9%) and failure to respond to previous antibiotic treatment (17.1%). Main Limitations: Convenience sampling with small number of cases. Aminoglycoside use not evaluated. Conclusions: Respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, complicated wounds and foal infections were the commonest reasons for protected antibiotic use. Lack of alternative drugs (for foals) and C&S results or failed previous treatments were commonest justifications. Supplementary Material File (protected_antibiotic_use_in_19_equine_practices._final_6.12.25_with clinical relevance.docx) Download 532.71 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 17 December 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection Equine Veterinary Education Keywords antibiotics cephalosporins critically important antibiotics fluoroquinolones Authors Affiliations Charlotte Sinclair CVS Group plc View all articles by this author Imogen Schofield CVS Group plc View all articles by this author H Stone CVS Group plc View all articles by this author Tim Mair 0000-0002-9744-9909 [email protected] CVS Group plc View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 220 views 154 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Charlotte Sinclair, Imogen Schofield, H Stone, et al. Protected Antimicrobial Use in Nineteen Equine Veterinary Practices in the UK. Authorea . 17 December 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176598009.93261052/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176598009.93261052/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00cfbea1bb83fe2',t:'MTc3OTYzMjg3Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00