Economic impact of antagonist protocol vs primed progesterone protocol in oocyte donor program A retrospective study
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of two ovarian stimulation procedures comparing the use of FSH antagonists with the use of FSH primed progesterone protocol in a oocyte donor program. Design: Calculation of cost-effectiveness ratios (costs per outcome achieved) from clinical practices using a retrospective cohort single university center study carried out from 2012 to 2021. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cost-effectiveness ratios as cost per mature oocyte and cost per treatment. Result(s): According to the economic analysis, ovarian stimulation with FSH antagonist protocol increased the overall cost of the treatment as well as the cost per retrieved and effective oocyte. The cost of gonadotrophins per mature oocyte retrieved was 49.27 ± 17.94 € and the cost of medication per mature oocyte retrieved was 59.26± 28.01 € . In the FSH primed progesterone group, the cost of gonadotrophins per mature oocyte retrieved was 44.67 ± 16.65€ and the cost of medication per mature oocyte retrieved was 44.91 ± 20.86€ Conclusion(s): Cost-effectiveness is a compelling reason for an egg donation program. Progestins can present an effective and less expensive option for egg donation programs in terms of cost.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00