Evaluating the Performance of the DPP® ZDC IgM/IgG Rapid Test for Chikungunya Virus Diagnosis in Febrile Outpatients: A Prospective, Diagnostic Accuracy Study
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the performance of a novel antibody-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for detecting Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection in febrile patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods We prospectively enrolled non-severe febrile patients aged 2-65 years presenting as outpatients between October 2018 and July 2019. Serum samples were collected during acute and convalescent phases and tested for CHIKV antibodies using the DPP® ZDC IgM/IgG rapid test and compared against the reference test, CHIKV RT-PCR. We determined the seropositivity using ELISA IgM/IgG and evaluated the diagnostic performance of the WHO-endorsed CHIKV clinical definition against the reference test. Results Of 500 participants, 226/261 (86.5%) tested ELISA IgM positive, 45/271 (16.6%) tested ELISA IgG positive, 100/294 (34%) CHIKV RT-PCR positive, and 117/495 (23.6%) RDT-antibody positive. During the acute phase [median 3 (2-4) days post illness onset], the sensitivity of IgM, IgG, and combined IgM/IgG ranged from 14.71-34.85%, while specificity ranged from 63.32-65.61%. During the convalescent phase [mean 16.5 (±5.5) days post-illness onset], sensitivity increased from 65.75% to 77.78%, and specificity ranged from 93.33-98.11%. The WHO’s CHIKV clinical definition had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 88 (79.9-93.6)%, 74 (68-80)%, 64.2 (58.2-69.8)%, and 92.3 (87.6-95.3)%, respectively. Conclusions The DPP® ZDC IgM/IgG accurately diagnosed CHIKV on samples collected during the convalescent phase. Field applications include investigating CHIKV in patients with sub-acute to chronic osteoarticular symptoms and conducting serosurveys to inform priority areas for CHIKV vaccine implementation. The WHO’s clinical definition of CHIKV was accurate and could be deployed, especially in regions with limited diagnostic capacity. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03047642
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00