Spectral theory of stochastic gene expression: a Hilbert space framework

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This paper is a unified survey-and-theory work that addresses discrepancies in claimed “exact” spectra for stochastic gene expression models, focusing on self-repressing gene circuits and proposing a Hilbert space (functional analytic) framework to derive spectra consistently. Using this framework, the authors analytically obtain eigenvalues and eigenvectors for constitutive, bursty, and autoregulated (self-repressing) gene expression models and use them to build an exact spectral representation for the time-dependent distribution of gene product numbers. They compare the spectral gap (the real part of the first nonzero eigenvalue) to deterministic predictions and find deterministic models fail to capture relaxation rates when autoregulation is strong, attributing this to the failure of standard linear algebra intuitions for infinite-dimensional operators. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A survey of the literature reveals notable discrepancies among the purported exact results for the spectra of stochastic gene expression models. For self-repressing gene circuits, previous studies ([Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 108103 (2007)], [Phys. Rev. E 83,062902 (2011)], [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 074105 (2024)], and [bioRxiv 2025.02.05.635946 (2025)]) have provided different exact solutions for the eigenvalues of the generator matrix. In this work, we propose a unified Hilbert space framework for the spectral theory of stochastic gene expression. Based on this framework, we analytically derive the spectra for models of constitutive, bursty, and autoregulated gene expression. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors obtained are then used to construct an exact spectral representation of the time-dependent distribution of gene product numbers. The spectral gap between the zero eigenvalue and the first nonzero eigenvalue, which reflects the relaxation rate of the system towards its steady state, is then compared with the prediction of the deterministic model, and we find that deterministic modeling fails to capture the relaxation rate when autoregulation is strong. In particular, our results demonstrate that for infinite-dimensional operators such as in stochastic gene expression models, many conclusions in linear algebra do not apply, and one must rely on the modern theory of functional analysis.
Full text 2,188 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract A survey of the literature reveals notable discrepancies among the purported exact results for the spectra of stochastic gene expression models. For self-repressing gene circuits, previous studies ([Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 108103 (2007)], [Phys. Rev. E 83,062902 (2011)], [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 074105 (2024)], and [bioRxiv 2025.02.05.635946 (2025)]) have provided different exact solutions for the eigenvalues of the generator matrix. In this work, we propose a unified Hilbert space framework for the spectral theory of stochastic gene expression. Based on this framework, we analytically derive the spectra for models of constitutive, bursty, and autoregulated gene expression. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors obtained are then used to construct an exact spectral representation of the time-dependent distribution of gene product numbers. The spectral gap between the zero eigenvalue and the first nonzero eigenvalue, which reflects the relaxation rate of the system towards its steady state, is then compared with the prediction of the deterministic model, and we find that deterministic modeling fails to capture the relaxation rate when autoregulation is strong. In particular, our results demonstrate that for infinite-dimensional operators such as in stochastic gene expression models, many conclusions in linear algebra do not apply, and one must rely on the modern theory of functional analysis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the discussion on the application of spectral theory to stochastic gene expression. Notably, we use the eigenvalues and eigenvectors obtained to construct an exact spectral representation of the time-dependent distribution of gene product numbers for the three models. The magnitude of the real part of the first nonzero eigenvalue, which reflects the relaxation rate to the steady state, is also compared with the prediction of the deterministic model. We demonstrate that deterministic modeling accurately capture the relaxation rate for constitutive and bursty genes, while it fails to reproduce the relaxation rate for self-repressing genes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00