Patient Preferences and Knowledge Regarding Hysterectomy: A Study from the Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network (FPRN)®
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe preference for and knowledge of hysterectomy routes in women presenting to urogynecology/gynecology clinics throughout the United States and to determine association with health literacy. Our primary aim was preference for hysterectomy route, and secondary aims were knowledge of basic pelvic structures and function, knowledge of various hysterectomy routes, and baseline health literacy level. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Patients' preference and knowledge for hysterectomy routes were assessed at initial presentation to the urogynecology/gynecology clinic with an anonymous, voluntary, self-administered questionnaire along with a validated health literacy test (Medical Term Recognition Test). RESULTS: Two hundred four women participated. Forty-five percent of patients were unsure which hysterectomy modality they would choose. Of patients who selected a preferred modality, 50% selected laparoscopic and 33% selected vaginal. Patients indicated that safety was considered highest priority when selecting route. The mean score for "knowledge about gynecology/hysterectomy" was 68%, with the high literacy group scoring higher compared with the low health literacy group (70% vs 60.1%, P = 0.01). More than 50% of patients incorrectly answered knowledge questions related to vaginal hysterectomy. Majority of the respondents had high health literacy (79.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer laparoscopic hysterectomy approach, although have limited understanding of vaginal hysterectomy. Higher health literacy levels are associated with increased knowledge of gynecology and hysterectomy routes, but were not found to influence patient preference for hysterectomy route. Overall, patients have limited knowledge of vaginal hysterectomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (17)
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.218 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1158-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/spv.0b013e31829ff765 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09714.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/spv.0b013e31826fb8d3 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000252 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c33c72 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003814 via openalex
- W6661873339 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318299a6cf via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003725 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:42:59.773506+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK