Why Are Hysterectomy Rates Declining?
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
To explore reasons for a 16% decline in hysterectomy rates in Ontario from 1982 to 1990, hysterectomy rates were examined by indications for the procedure, across different age groups, by type of hospital (community vs teaching), and by use of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) with hysterectomy. Menstrual hemorrhage, fibroids, genital prolapse, endometriosis, and cancer were the main indications for hysterectomy. Over time, hysterectomy for fibroids and genital prolapse rates decreased slightly for women <45 years but increased for older women. For cancer, a slight decline in rates was demonstrated for women <45, but rates were stable for older women. For endometriosis, there was no change in rates for any age group. However, for menstrual hemorrhage, large declines were seen for women <54 years especially women aged 35–44 (24% decline). The proportion of women undergoing BSO with hysterectomy increased from 29% in 1982 to 34% in 1990, with women <35 experiencing a significant increase in the rate of this combination procedure. Teaching hospitals showed a greater decline in hysterectomy for noncancerous conditions, whereas community hospitals performed fewer hysterectomies for cancer with time. Most of the fall in hysterectomy rates in Ontario in the 1980s is accounted for by women under 45 years of age undergoing fewer procedures, especially for menstrual hemorrhage. The declines for these groups were substantial and offset a general increase in hysterectomy rates for women over 55. These changes may result from various factors, including wider treatment options (alternative medical treatments or more conservative surgery), more awareness among women and providers of options including nonsurgical alternatives, and delayed childbearing influencing the need to conserve reproductive capacity.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (20)
- W34768376 via openalex
- W1603571351 via openalex
- W1673749503 via openalex
- W1995634490 via openalex
- W1995761768 via openalex
- W1998062473 via openalex
- W2001682504 via openalex
- W2005373094 via openalex
- W2038994407 via openalex
- W2091986731 via openalex
- W2113323138 via openalex
- W2287441279 via openalex
- W2340070178 via openalex
- W2399049943 via openalex
- W2417295149 via openalex
- W2427418290 via openalex
- W2468377867 via openalex
- W4234617474 via openalex
- W4242877350 via openalex
- W4296577444 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK