Development of a Novel Machine Learning Model for Automatic Assessment of Quality of Transvaginal Ultrasound Images From Multi-Annotator Labels

other OA: hybrid CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Accurate diagnosis of pathology from ultrasound images is reliant upon images of a suitable diagnostic quality being acquired. This study aimed to create a novel machine learning model to automatically assess transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) image quality for gynaecological ultrasound. METHOD: Six imaging professionals (two sonographers, two gynaecological sonologists and two radiologists) assigned a quality score to 150 TVUS images from 50 cases (50 uterus images and 100 ovary images). Images were given a score of 1-4 (1-reject/image inaccurate, 2-poor quality, 3-suboptimal quality or 4-optimal quality). As variation existed between the scores assigned by the labellers, we framed this problem as a multi-annotator noisy label problem. To address this, a new machine learning architecture was developed, combining a weighted ensemble algorithm to estimate consensus labels and a multi-axis vision transformer (MaxViT) to handle noisy labels, improving model accuracy in predicting image quality. Forty cases (120 images) were used for model training, while the remaining 10 cases (30 images) were reserved as a test set for model evaluation. RESULTS: The novel machine learning architecture we created was able to successfully determine image quality with a validation accuracy of 80% and a macro average recall of 77%. This significantly improved upon the 57% accuracy of the baseline machine learning method (ResNet50). The MaxViTs were able to outperform human performance in most cases, with an accuracy of 80% surpassing four of the six human labellers. CONCLUSIONS: This novel machine learning model offers an automated method of assessing the quality of TVUS images. The tool has the potential to provide real-time feedback to those performing TVUS, reduce the need for repeated imaging, and improve the diagnosis of gynaecological pathology.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-17T02:30:03.883495+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-19T00:30:52.622640+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine