The contribution of non-additive genetic effects to the genetic variance of polyploid species

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Whole genome duplication is a common mutation in eukaryotes with far-reaching phenotypic effects. The resulting morphological, physiological, and fitness consequences and how they affect the survival probability of newly polyploid lineages are intensively studied, but very little is known about the effect of genome doubling on the short-term evolvability of populations. Understanding the effect of polyploidization on the adaptive potential of populations is of crucial importance to predict the future of polyploid populations. In this paper, I investigate the immediate consequences of genome doubling on the genetic variance of populations. To do so, I performed numerical iterations and simulations of how the genetic variance of a quantitative trait changes after polyploidization, under different genetic architectures (additivity, dominance, and epistasis). I found that genetic variance generally decreases after genome doubling. Non-additive gene actions can make autotetraploid populations genetically more diverse than their diploid progenitors in rare cases, notably with overdominance and directional epistasis. By collecting estimates from the agronomic literature, I found that both dominance and epistatic variance contribute to the genetic variance of polyploid populations. These results bring new insights into the adaptive potential of newly formed tetraploid populations, and call for further experimental investigations of how polyploidization is associated with a short-term decrease in evolvability.
Full text 1,767 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Whole genome duplication is a common mutation in eukaryotes with far-reaching phenotypic effects. The resulting morphological, physiological, and fitness consequences and how they affect the survival probability of newly polyploid lineages are intensively studied, but very little is known about the effect of genome doubling on the short-term evolvability of populations. Understanding the effect of polyploidization on the adaptive potential of populations is of crucial importance to predict the future of polyploid populations. In this paper, I investigate the immediate consequences of genome doubling on the genetic variance of populations. To do so, I performed numerical iterations and simulations of how the genetic variance of a quantitative trait changes after polyploidization, under different genetic architectures (additivity, dominance, and epistasis). I found that genetic variance generally decreases after genome doubling. Non-additive gene actions can make autotetraploid populations genetically more diverse than their diploid progenitors in rare cases, notably with overdominance and directional epistasis. By collecting estimates from the agronomic literature, I found that both dominance and epistatic variance contribute to the genetic variance of polyploid populations. These results bring new insights into the adaptive potential of newly formed tetraploid populations, and call for further experimental investigations of how polyploidization is associated with a short-term decrease in evolvability. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Social media: Bluesky @josselin-clo.bsky.social COI: I have no conflict of interest to declare. Funding details: J.C. is supported by the CNRS.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00