Patient-Physician Interactions Regarding Dyspareunia With Endometriosis: Online Survey Results [33M]
An online survey of 357 women with endometriosis and dyspareunia revealed suboptimal patient-physician communication, noting that most discussed painful sex without receiving a specific diagnosis and preferred clinicians to initiate such conversations.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study utilized an online survey to evaluate patient-physician communication regarding dyspareunia among women with endometriosis. The analysis of 357 respondents revealed that while most discussed painful sex with a gynecologist, few were correctly diagnosed with the condition, and many cited embarrassment or hopelessness as barriers to seeking care. Participants indicated that healthcare providers should initiate conversations about this symptom, yet current management often relies on surgery or over-the-counter medications rather than comprehensive dialogue. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically addressing the clinical challenge of managing dyspareunia and improving doctor-patient communication for this specific symptom within the disease context.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,980 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Introduction
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-06T06:46:56.404536+00:00