A Data-Driven Cognitive Feature–Based Model for English Text Readability Assessment to Support College English Instruction

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This study proposes a cognitive feature–based model incorporating lexical rarity, logical complexity, and comprehension difficulty to improve English text readability assessment, outperforming traditional linguistic-only models.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This preprint studies data-driven English text readability assessment by proposing a cognitive feature–based model that aims to better capture reading-comprehension processes beyond traditional surface linguistic features. Using multiple machine learning models and four benchmark datasets (CEFR, CLEC, OneStopEnglish, and RACE), the authors integrate cognitive features reflecting lexical rarity, logical complexity, and comprehension difficulty with conventional linguistic features, and report that combined models outperform linguistic-feature-only models across multiple evaluation metrics. The main stated limitation is that the work is a preprint and has not yet been peer reviewed. Relevance to endometriosis: it is not about endometriosis or adenomyosis and does not explicitly discuss them; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Text readability assessment is essential for effective college English teaching and instructional material selection. Traditional readability models mainly rely on surface linguistic features and often fail to reflect the cognitive processes involved in reading comprehension. To address this limitation, this study proposes a cognitive feature–based approach for English text readability assessment, aiming to support data-driven English teaching evaluation. The proposed method incorporates cognitive features related to lexical rarity, logical complexity, and comprehension difficulty, and integrates them with conventional linguistic features. Multiple machine learning models are employed and evaluated on four benchmark datasets, including CEFR, CLEC, OneStopEnglish, and RACE. Experimental results show that models combining cognitive and linguistic features consistently outperform those using linguistic features alone across multiple evaluation metrics. The findings indicate that cognitive features provide complementary information for readability assessment and enhance the discriminability of readability levels. This study offers practical implications for college English teaching by enabling more accurate matching between reading materials and learners’ proficiency levels, thereby supporting personalized and data-driven instructional decision-making.
Full text 13,227 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Data-Driven Cognitive Feature–Based Model for English Text Readability Assessment to Support College English Instruction | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article A Data-Driven Cognitive Feature–Based Model for English Text Readability Assessment to Support College English Instruction Jing Zhao, Congrong Zou This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted 15 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Text readability assessment is essential for effective college English teaching and instructional material selection. Traditional readability models mainly rely on surface linguistic features and often fail to reflect the cognitive processes involved in reading comprehension. To address this limitation, this study proposes a cognitive feature–based approach for English text readability assessment, aiming to support data-driven English teaching evaluation. The proposed method incorporates cognitive features related to lexical rarity, logical complexity, and comprehension difficulty, and integrates them with conventional linguistic features. Multiple machine learning models are employed and evaluated on four benchmark datasets, including CEFR, CLEC, OneStopEnglish, and RACE. Experimental results show that models combining cognitive and linguistic features consistently outperform those using linguistic features alone across multiple evaluation metrics. The findings indicate that cognitive features provide complementary information for readability assessment and enhance the discriminability of readability levels. This study offers practical implications for college English teaching by enabling more accurate matching between reading materials and learners’ proficiency levels, thereby supporting personalized and data-driven instructional decision-making. Humanities/Language and linguistics Social science/Language and linguistics Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing Biological sciences/Psychology Social science/Psychology English Teaching Text Readability Assessment Cognitive Features Educational Data Mining Machine Learning Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 23 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 14 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 29 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 13 Mar, 2026 Reviews received at journal 07 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 02 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 02 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Feb, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Feb, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 25 Feb, 2026 Editor invited by journal 22 Jan, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 20 Jan, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 20 Jan, 2026 First submitted to journal 14 Jan, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8598697","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":598699365,"identity":"f62a35b1-3347-4936-afa4-5ff892d9cabd","order_by":0,"name":"Jing Zhao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hubei Normal University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jing","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhao","suffix":""},{"id":598699366,"identity":"f3f383ec-1c64-48a1-8336-07f5f9736dc0","order_by":1,"name":"Congrong Zou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hubei Normal University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Congrong","middleName":"","lastName":"Zou","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-14 07:24:30","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103775298,"identity":"4823dea7-4824-4d80-8960-b5af426f9074","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-02 18:25:13","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":767002,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8598697/v1_covered_d0f88d7a-8bbe-4c40-9eac-d72236f11a8c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"A Data-Driven Cognitive Feature–Based Model for English Text Readability Assessment to Support College English Instruction","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"English Teaching, Text Readability Assessment, Cognitive Features, Educational Data Mining, Machine Learning","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Text readability assessment is essential for effective college English teaching and instructional material selection. Traditional readability models mainly rely on surface linguistic features and often fail to reflect the cognitive processes involved in reading comprehension. To address this limitation, this study proposes a cognitive feature–based approach for English text readability assessment, aiming to support data-driven English teaching evaluation. The proposed method incorporates cognitive features related to lexical rarity, logical complexity, and comprehension difficulty, and integrates them with conventional linguistic features. Multiple machine learning models are employed and evaluated on four benchmark datasets, including CEFR, CLEC, OneStopEnglish, and RACE. Experimental results show that models combining cognitive and linguistic features consistently outperform those using linguistic features alone across multiple evaluation metrics. The findings indicate that cognitive features provide complementary information for readability assessment and enhance the discriminability of readability levels. This study offers practical implications for college English teaching by enabling more accurate matching between reading materials and learners’ proficiency levels, thereby supporting personalized and data-driven instructional decision-making.","manuscriptTitle":"A Data-Driven Cognitive Feature–Based Model for English Text Readability Assessment to Support College English Instruction","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-02 18:24:53","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8598697/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-04-23T05:44:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-14T09:01:52+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-29T15:27:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-13T14:56:27+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-07T19:34:44+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"231529879368063751443958843248372607042","date":"2026-03-03T00:31:17+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"251112983120029907701710405260362677414","date":"2026-03-02T15:24:06+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"218801782168480183715018972016661073960","date":"2026-03-01T04:10:59+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"68838696110270401458744137525648096090","date":"2026-02-26T16:46:34+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"238575729499537744137738044768530632877","date":"2026-02-26T08:41:40+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-02-25T19:57:38+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-01-22T10:26:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-01-21T04:55:05+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-01-21T04:54:48+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2026-01-14T07:17:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c51f6fa2-0735-4778-9937-ab1a3229707e","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 2nd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"in-revision","subjectAreas":[{"id":63712047,"name":"Humanities/Language and linguistics"},{"id":63712048,"name":"Social science/Language and linguistics"},{"id":63712049,"name":"Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing"},{"id":63712050,"name":"Biological sciences/Psychology"},{"id":63712051,"name":"Social science/Psychology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-23T05:53:58+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-02 18:24:53","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8598697","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8598697","identity":"rs-8598697","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00