Student Preferences for Microbiology Laboratory Teaching Approaches in a Problem-Based Learning Curriculum

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Microbiology is a mandatory component in all medical schools. The microbiology lab sessions at Arabian Gulf University focus on students' ability to demonstrate pre-identified laboratory competencies and relate laboratory data with clinical scenarios. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey among undergraduates to know the preferences with respect to delivery methods for optimally facilitating learning for each laboratory sessions. Methods The participants were year 3 and 4 medical students who were engaged in microbiology laboratory instruction as part of their undergraduate medical education. All the participants were asked to complete the structured and validated survey (Google form). Descriptive statistics were used to examine the demographic characteristics of the participants and their responses to the scale items. Results Among 168 student responses, the majority preferred a blended mode of learning of lab sessions across all the three years. The preferences were based on the lab objectives where the students preferred theoretical aspects, case discussions may be conducted online while the skill development sessions may be conducted face to face. Conclusion The overall trend indicated that students valued the flexibility of blended learning while recognizing the importance of in-person sessions for achieving laboratory competencies and clinical application skills. These findings will support future research in evaluating various delivery methods and contribute to the advancement of high-quality microbiology education.
Full text 1,627 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Microbiology is a mandatory component in all medical schools. The microbiology lab sessions at Arabian Gulf University focus on students' ability to demonstrate pre-identified laboratory competencies and relate laboratory data with clinical scenarios. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey among undergraduates to know the preferences with respect to delivery methods for optimally facilitating learning for each laboratory sessions.

Methods

The participants were year 3 and 4 medical students who were engaged in microbiology laboratory instruction as part of their undergraduate medical education. All the participants were asked to complete the structured and validated survey (Google form). Descriptive statistics were used to examine the demographic characteristics of the participants and their responses to the scale items.

Results

Among 168 student responses, the majority preferred a blended mode of learning of lab sessions across all the three years. The preferences were based on the lab objectives where the students preferred theoretical aspects, case discussions may be conducted online while the skill development sessions may be conducted face to face.

Conclusion

The overall trend indicated that students valued the flexibility of blended learning while recognizing the importance of in-person sessions for achieving laboratory competencies and clinical application skills. These findings will support future research in evaluating various delivery methods and contribute to the advancement of high-quality microbiology education. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00