Full text
64,981 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats Hongfeng Li , Zheng Y.X. Huang , Jie Lan , Li Hu , Zhilin Wang , Yingying Wang , Luca Santini , View ORCID Profile Daniel J. Becker , Fuwen Wei , Yifei Xu doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675328 Hongfeng Li 1 Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zheng Y.X. Huang 2 Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University , Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jie Lan 1 Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Li Hu 1 Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zhilin Wang 3 Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University , Nanchang, Jiangxi, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yingying Wang 4 One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California , Davis, CA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Luca Santini 5 Department of Biology and Biotechnologies “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Daniel J. Becker 6 School of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel J. Becker For correspondence: danbeck{at}ou.edu weifw{at}ioz.ac.cn yifei.xu{at}sdu.edu.cn Fuwen Wei 3 Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University , Nanchang, Jiangxi, China 7 CAS Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: danbeck{at}ou.edu weifw{at}ioz.ac.cn yifei.xu{at}sdu.edu.cn Yifei Xu 1 Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: danbeck{at}ou.edu weifw{at}ioz.ac.cn yifei.xu{at}sdu.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Wild small mammals represent critical sources of zoonotic infections due to their high diversity, global distribution, and proximity to humans. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps persist in characterizing pan-taxonomic microbial richness and sharing dynamics, particularly regarding ecologically critical yet understudied Eulipotyphla (true insectivores). Here we take a macroecological approach to compare how microbial hosting and transmission differ across insectivores, rodents, and bats, and what ecological factors drive such disparities. We find that insectivores host comparable microbial richness to rodents and bats while exhibiting superior intra- and cross-order transmission efficiency. Urban adaptation, geographic range area, and longevity are shared drivers of microbial richness and transmission across these host orders, while greater body mass and shorter gestation time specifically are positive predictors of these outcomes within insectivores. Climate change projections identify insectivores as primary transmission hosts in new high-latitude hotspots by 2035, including parts of the US, Canada, and Russia, posing greater zoonotic threats than rodents or bats. Our findings challenge the prevailing paradigm that prioritizes rodents and bats as special zoonotic reservoirs, establishing insectivores as critical but overlooked players in disease ecology. Collective proactive surveillance of insectivores, rodents, and bats is imperative for forecasting emerging zoonotic threats and informing global risk assessment frameworks. Introduction Most emerging infectious diseases in humans originate through cross-species pathogen transmission from animal hosts 1 , 2 . Wild small mammals, notably species from the orders Rodentia (rodents), Chiroptera (bats), and Eulipotyphla (“true insectivores”, hereafter insectivores), represent critical sources of zoonotic pathogens due to their high diversity, global distribution, and proximity to and occasional-to-frequent interactions with humans 3 – 5 . Most work-to-date has focused on the diversity and human infectivity of viruses in particular 2 , 6 – 8 , with relatively less attention to other microbial taxa 9 , 10 . As such, the diversity and transmission of microbes more broadly within and across wild small mammals remain poorly understood. A better understanding is of central importance for mitigating and preventing future infectious disease outbreaks. According to the special reservoir hypothesis, rodents and bats are distinct hosts that disproportionately maintain zoonotic pathogens and transmit them to humans 11 . High-profile viruses have been especially well characterized in these host orders and include but are not limited to severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronaviruses (SARS-related CoVs), henipaviruses, lyssaviruses, and hantaviruses 12 – 15 . This ability to host such virulent viruses, often without showing disease, likely comes from their special ecological traits, such as high metabolism, torpor, and unique immune systems 16 – 18 , although the speciose nature of these orders also may explain the high viral diversity 11 . In contrast to these well-studied groups, insectivores have recently been shown to also harbor a number of important zoonotic viruses, such as hantaviruses, Borna disease virus (BoDV), Middle East respiratory syndrome–related coronaviruses (MERS-related CoVs), severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV), and Langya henipavirus 19 – 23 . Some insectivore species even host more viruses than rodents and bats 3 . Additionally, among all mammalian orders, insectivores hold the second-most central position for virus sharing, posing a potential threat to public health through spillover and emergence 8 . While prior investigations have advanced our understanding of viral diversity and transmission in wild small mammals, research effort has been strongly skewed towards rodents, bats, and this particular pathogen group. This has resulted in significant gaps in characterizing pan-taxonomic microbial richness and sharing dynamics, which is especially pronounced for understudied but ecologically critical groups such as insectivores and for the broader (non-viral) microbial community. Specifically, it remains unexplored whether the pattern of microbe hosting and transmission differs across insectivores, rodents, and bats as well as what ecological factors underpin these potential disparities. Filling these knowledge gaps is essential for building predictive frameworks to optimize zoonotic surveillance resource allocation and preempt spillover events. Such predictive efforts are increasingly urgent under climate change, which can alter host distributions, abundance, and contact rates, thereby reshaping the landscape of microbial transmission risk within and between host species 24 , 25 . Here, we took a macroecological approach to comprehensively investigate microbe hosting and transmission patterns across insectivores, rodents, and bats. We aimed to (i) compare the patterns of microbe hosting and transmission between these three orders, (ii) dissect ecological factors underlying the differences, and (iii) predict geographic hotspots of microbial transmission risk under several climate change scenarios. Our work highlights wild small mammals, in particular insectivores, that present risks of pathogen spillover to humans and provides a scientific basis for targeted surveillance and early warning systems. Methods Data collection We collected host–microbe data for insectivores, rodents, and bats from multiple sources prior to 17 November 2024. Data sources included the Global Virome in One Network (VIRION) 26 , Enhanced Infectious Diseases Database (EID2) 27 , GenBank database, and a specialized insectivore database 8 . All records were merged and deduplicated to ensure data accuracy. Host and microbe species names were standardized to Latin names using the NCBI Taxonomy Database for consistency. Microbes included viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi. The final database comprised 1,424 insectivore host–microbe interactions (922 microbes across 132 host species), 8,937 rodent host–microbe interactions (4,678 microbes across 683 host species), and 9,113 bat host–microbe interactions (4,686 microbes across 526 host species; Fig. 1a ). Human-associated microbes were defined as microbes reported in humans in at least one of the VIRION, EID2, or GenBank databases 2 , 8 , 28 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Microbial diversity in insectivores, rodents, and bats. a) Statistical metrics of host–microbe networks. Proportion of human-associated microbes (%) denotes the proportion of human-associated microbes relative to total microbes. NMDS analysis of b) total microbial diversity (insectivores, n = 132; rodents, n = 683; bats, n = 526) and c) human-associated microbial diversity (insectivores, n = 67; rodents, n = 478; bats, n = 370) among three host orders based on Jaccard distance. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around group centroids. Boxplots display data distributions with the central line indicating the median, the box boundaries representing the interquartile range (IQR, 25th to 75th percentiles), whiskers extending to the most extreme data points within 1.5×IQR from the box, and dots beyond the whiskers shown as outliers. Asterisks denote statistical significance: ns, P > 0.05; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001. The coefficients estimates and 95%CIs for d) total microbial richness ( n = 1100) and e) human-associated microbial richness ( n = 785) derived from the PGLS models. Circles represent coefficient estimates, and lines indicate 95%CIs. Statistical significance: red, P ≤ 0.001; yellow, P ≤ 0.01; blue, P ≤ 0.05; black, P > 0.05. Microbial diversity across host orders Variation in host species-level microbial composition across host orders was examined through non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analyses based on Jaccard distance metrics, implemented with the vegan package in R (v4.3.1) 29 . Permutation multivariate analyses of variance (PERMANOVA) were used to test differences in beta diversity. To correct for potential sampling bias, rarefaction curve analysis of microbial richness in our three host orders was conducted based on the number of sampled host species within insectivores, rodents, and bats. We derived a phylogeny of all included host species from the PHYLACINE database 30 , 31 and then used phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) models to analyze microbial richness while controlling for evolutionary relatedness. We first estimated phylogenetic signal using Pagel’s λ from an intercept-only PGLS model with the caper package 32 – 34 , where a λ of 0 indicates no phylogenetic signal, while a λ of 1 suggests strong phylogenetic dependence. We then fit PGLS models in the phylolm package to analyze microbial richness as a function of host order while controlling for log (x+1) -transformed sampling effort 35 . Sampling effort was defined as the number of PubMed citations with the Latin name of each host species. Microbe-sharing network Microbe-sharing networks were constructed to characterize cross-species transmission dynamics across three host orders studied. Bipartite host–microbe networks were independently generated for three host orders collectively and for each order individually, with separate analyses performed for both total and human-associated microbes. Nodes represented host or microbe species, while edges indicated host–microbe associations. These bipartite networks were subsequently projected into unipartite microbe-sharing networks where nodes exclusively represented host species and edge weights quantified the number of shared microbial species between host pairs. Topological characterizations were conducted at network and node levels. Network-level metrics included assortativity (likelihood of high-degree nodes connecting to other high-degree degree nodes and low-degree nodes to other low-degree nodes), transitivity (if two nodes are connected, the probability that their adjacent nodes are also connected), edge count, density, mean degree, mean weighted degree (and adjusted), average shortest path length, and average weighted shortest path length (and adjusted). Node-level metrics comprised degree, closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality, PageRank centrality 36 , as well as their weighted counterparts, for assessing host species centrality. We controlled for sampling effort through linear regression of edge weights, where the number of shared microbes between host pairs was predicted by the lesser sampling effort within each pair. Statistical significance of regression coefficients was explicitly tested to confirm positive associations between sampling effort and observed microbial sharing (Table S1). Original edge weights were then replaced with additively rescaled regression residuals constrained to positive values. All network metrics were subsequently recalculated using these adjusted weights 37 , 38 . Statistical significance of network parameters was assessed against 10,000 randomized null models generated through edge-weight permutations to determine whether the observed networks differed significantly from random networks 39 . To assess differences in the normalized adjusted weighted centrality metrics across the three orders, we again used PGLS, employing the same approach as for microbial richness. To quantify centrality, principal component analyses (PCA) were applied to the four adjusted weighted centrality metrics. The first principal component (PC1), explaining > 94% of total variance (Table S2), was adopted as a composite centrality index representing microbial transmission capacity 37 . Given the phylogenetic conservatism in traits regulating pathogen exposure, susceptibility, and suitability 40 , 41 , we quantified phylogenetic signal for microbial transmission capacity (represented by PC1 scores derived from centrality metrics) using Pagel’s λ 32 – 34 . Microbe-sharing communities were identified using the Louvain algorithm from the igraph package 42 – 44 . The analysis was performed with edge weights set to NULL (as weights were inherently incorporated during network construction) and a default resolution parameter of 1 to balance community sizes. Final community assignments for all nodes were extracted and visualized using Cytoscape (v3.10.2). Ecological analyses We next determined the ecological factors influencing microbial richness and transmission across the three host orders studied. Data on ecological factors were compiled from public databases, including life-history traits (body mass, litter size, gestation time, maximum longevity, and sexual maturity age), distribution features (habitat diversity and geographic range area), dietary diversity, urban adaptation status, minimum human population density (MHD) within distribution areas, and migratory behavior (for bats only). Body mass and gestation time data were sourced from the EltonTraits 45 and AnAge databases 46 , respectively. Data on maximum longevity, sexual maturity age, geographic range area, and MHD were obtained from the PanTHERIA database 47 . Litter size data was sourced from the AnAge and Amniotes database 46 , 48 . Dietary diversity was quantified using the Shannon diversity index based on proportional representations across ten food categories in EltonTraits, calculated using the vegan package 29 , 45 . Habitat diversity was defined as the number of first-level habitat categories utilized by a species recorded in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List database ( https://www.iucnredlist.org/ ) 49 . Urban-adaptation status was determined using a published database on long-term urban adaptation in mammals 50 . Species classified as "dweller" or "visitor" were considered "urban-adapted" (1), while those not included in the urban-adapted dataset were coded as "non-urban" (2). Migratory behavior among bats was categorized as sedentary/short-distance, regional, or long-distance migratory 7 . Missing trait data were imputed using random forest approaches 51 , 52 . PGLS models were applied to examine the effect of the above host traits on microbial richness and transmission 53 , 54 . Candidate models were constructed by including as many main effects as possible (i.e., body mass, litter size, gestation time, maximum longevity, sexual maturity age, habitat diversity, geographic range area, dietary diversity, urban adaptation status, MHD, sampling effort, and bat-specific migratory behavior), removing collinear predictor variables (i.e., Spearman’s ρ > 0.65; Fig. S1–Fig. S4; or variance inflation factor [VIF] > 5). The number of predictor variables was limited to ensure that each estimated coefficient had at least 10 observations. Candidate models were compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC), derived Akaike weights, and averaged coefficients when the ΔAIC of multiple models was less than two 55 . Model averaging was performed using the MuMIn package 54 , 56 . We constructed PGLS models for the pooled host orders and for each host order individually to quantify the effects of host traits on microbial metrics. Microbial transmission risk map Global microbial transmission risk was comprehensively assessed by integrating spatially explicit population abundance data of host species with centrality metrics of their microbe-sharing network. Raster layers of species distributions and population abundance for both baseline and future scenarios were utilized 57 – 59 . The 2015 baseline data represented habitat suitability under 2000–2030 averaged climate conditions. Future projections modeled conditions for 2035 under two shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs): SSP1 (sustainability development pathway, low climate stress) and SSP3 (regional rivalry pathway, high climate exposure), based on the 2020–2050 averaged climate conditions 60 . Muicrobial transmission risk ( T grid ) was quantified per grid cell using the formula: where α i is the population abundance of species i for both baseline and future scenarios 57 – 59 , C i denotes the standardized network centrality score (PC1) derived from microbe-sharing network topology, and n represents the number of host species within the grid cell. All analyses utilized a unified 0.5° geographic grid (WGS84, 55 km at the equator). Transmission high-risk hotspot areas were defined as grid cells with T grid values exceeding the 90 th percentile of global distribution. Emerging risk areas were grid cells where T grid increased by >20% from 2015 to 2035. Total and human-associated microbial transmission risk were quantified across the pooled host orders and for each host order. Geographic visualization was generated using national boundary vector data extracted via the rnaturalearth package and rendered with ggplot2 34 . To evaluate associations between predicted microbial transmission risk and zoonotic emerging infectious diseases (EID) risk, we fit a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a beta distribution using the glmmTMB package 61 . The dependent variable, zoonotic EID risk (quantified as the probability of an EID event occurring within a grid cell, adjusted for reporting effort and human population), was derived from observed wildlife disease outbreaks between 1970 and 2016 62 . The independent variable was the predicted T grid values for human-associated microbes derived from the combined target host orders in 2015. Continent was included as a random effect to account for inherent regional heterogeneity in EID risk. Results Insectivores host comparable microbial richness to rodents and bats We compared microbial diversity across insectivores, rodents, and bats. NMDS and PERMANOVA analyses revealed significant differences in both total (stress value = 0.161, R 2 = 0.014, F = 9.29, df = 1341) and human-associated microbial compositions (stress value = 0.123, R 2 = 0.022, F = 10.486, df = 915) across three host orders (all P < 0.001; Fig. 1b and Fig. 1c ). To assess potential sampling biases, we used rarefaction curves, which showed accumulation of total microbial, viral, and bacterial richness with increasing sampling effort at the order levels (Fig. S5). Next, using PGLS, we found low phylogenetic dependence in microbial richness (λ range = 0–0.043; Table S3), while increased sampling effort universally enhanced richness across all host orders (PGLS: all P < 0.001; Table S3). Following adjustment for sampling effort, our analyses revealed broad equivalence in microbial richness among insectivores, rodents, and bats. For human-associated microbes, insectivores exhibited richness comparable to both rodents (PGLS: β = −0.184, P = 0.095) and bats (β = −0.019, P = 0.865; Fig. 1e ). This pattern extended to human-associated viral and bacterial subgroups, with insectivores showing richness comparable to both rodents (viruses: β = −0.078, P = 0.699; bacteria: β = −0.276, P = 0.067) and bats (β = 0.296, P = 0.122; β = −0.128, P = 0.434; Table S3). When examining total microbes, insectivores exhibited comparable richness to bats (β = 0.142, P = 0.108; Fig. 1d ) and higher richness than rodents (β = −0.171, P = 0.047). Total viral and bacterial richness further supported this pattern of equivalence, revealing no significant differences among the three host orders ( P > 0.05; Table S3). Higher cross-order and intra-order microbial transmission efficiency in insectivores We constructed integrated microbe-sharing networks by combining data from insectivores, rodents, and bats, revealing distinct topological structures across host orders. Notably, insectivores showed a higher proportion of cross-order transmitted microbes (27.22%) than rodents (9.30%, χ 2 = 228.54, P < 0.001) or bats (6.47%, χ 2 = 370.53, P < 0.001; Fig. 2b and Fig. S6a). For human-associated microbes, insectivores maintained an even greater cross-order transmission proportion (75.90%) compared to bats (58.02%, χ 2 = 86.74, P < 0.001) and rodents (37.56%, χ 2 = 15.71, P < 0.001; Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b ). Specifically, insectivores disproportionately shared microbes with rodents, accounting for 55.49% of their total microbial connections. Notably, this proportion increased to 59.38% when only considering human-associated microbes, indicating enhanced linkage specifically in microbes of zoonotic concern. Rodents primarily shared microbes with bats (46.69%) in the total microbe-sharing network, but displayed stronger intra-order connectivity for human-associated microbes, accounting for 45.70% of their connections. Bats, by contrast, maintained the highest intra-order connectivity in both total (50.95%) and human-associated microbe-sharing networks (54.09%), showing higher intra-order connectivity than cross-order transmission. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Microbe-sharing networks among insectivores, rodents, and bats. a) Human-associated microbe-sharing network for the pooled host orders (insectivores, rodents, and bats), with colors representing distinct community modules. b) Venn diagrams show the number of microbes shared among insectivores, rodents, and bats. Black numerals denote the number of shared total microbial species, while red numerals indicate the number of shared human-associated microbial species. c) Statistical metrics and associated P -values for the microbe-sharing network. P -values indicate the significance of difference between insectivores, rodents, and bats networks based on random permutations of the networks. P < 0.001 indicates significant differences between orders (pairwise tests). d) The coefficients estimates and 95%CIs for adjusted weighted centrality metrics of human-associated microbe-sharing networks derived from the PGLS models ( n = 774). Circles represent coefficient estimates, and lines indicate 95%CIs. Statistical significance: red, P ≤ 0.001; yellow, P ≤ 0.01; blue, P ≤ 0.05; black, P > 0.05. e) Radar plots illustrating standardized adjusted weighted centrality metrics for central species in the human-associated microbe-sharing networks. We also constructed order-specific networks to comparatively analyze microbial sharing patterns across these three orders, finding higher transmission efficiency within insectivores. In human-associated microbe-sharing networks, insectivores showed higher network assortativity (−0.131) than rodents (−0.19) and bats (−0.130; Fig. 2c ). Insectivores exhibited intermediate network density (0.18) and transitivity (0.63) between rodents (density: 0.13; transitivity: 0.48) and bats (0.28; 0.72; Fig. 2c ). Notably, following adjustment of sampling effort, insectivores showed significantly shorter mean weighted shortest path lengths (21.95) than rodents (72.62) and bats (29.79; Fig. 2c ). We found similar patterns in the total microbe-sharing networks (see Supplementary Information). Furthermore, centrality analyses identified central species acting as hubs within the host order-specific microbe-sharing networks. PGLS models comparing four adjusted weighted centrality metrics revealed a weak-to-moderate phylogenetic signal (λ range = 0.147–0.694; Table S4). In both total and human-associated microbe-sharing networks, insectivore species consistently exhibited significantly higher normalized adjusted weighted closeness and PR centrality scores than those of rodents or bats (PGLS: all P < 0.001; Fig. 2d and Fig. S6c). Examining specific central host species, the European shrew ( Sorex araneus ) in the total network exhibited superior adjusted weighted closeness, eigenvector, and PR centrality compared to the black rat ( Rattus rattus ) and common vampire bat ( Desmodus rotundus ; Fig. S6b). Concordantly, within human-associated networks, the European shrew consistently emerged as the most central species, showing significantly higher adjusted weighted closeness and PR centrality than the house mouse ( Mus musculus ) and Leschenault’s rousette ( Rousettus leschenaultii ; Fig. 2e ). Ecological drivers of microbial richness and transmission To further assess the effects of ecological factors on microbial richness and transmission across and within the three host orders studied, we again used PGLS models. Our analyses revealed limited phylogenetic influence on microbial richness and transmission. Across all three orders, we found low phylogenetic signal for total (λ = 0.085) and human-associated microbial transmission capacity (λ = 0.067). Additionally, order-specific models revealed that insectivores showed weak phylogenetic signal in human-associated microbial richness (λ = 0.029), while rodents exhibited weak phylogenetic signals in both total (λ = 0.187) and human-associated microbial transmission capacity (λ = 0.161). Bats displayed weak phylogenetic signal only for total microbial richness (λ = 0.004). For data pooled across host orders, urban-adaptation status, maximum longevity, and geographic range area all were positively correlated with human-associated microbial richness and transmission capacity ( Fig. 3a , Fig. 3b , and Table S5). Additionally, habitat diversity (β = 0.1, P < 0.001) and sampling effort (β = 0.85, P < 0.001) had a positive effect on human-associated microbial richness, while body mass had a negative effect (β = −0.56, P < 0.001). For human-associated microbial transmission capacity, litter size had a positive effect (β = 0.22, P < 0.001) while sexual maturity age had a negative effect (β = −0.19, P < 0.001). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Influence of ecological traits on microbial richness and transmission in insectivores, rodents, and bats. a) Summary of PGLS analyses. Bar plots (left) indicate the number of significant ecological traits associated with microbial richness or transmission. Dot plots (middle) identify influential ecological traits, with the symbols denoting a positive (+) or negative (−) effect. Colors represent distinct host orders. The coefficients estimates and 95%CIs for microbial richness and transmission derived from the best PGLS models in b) the pooled host orders, c) insectivores, d) rodents, and e) bats. Circles represent coefficient estimates, and lines indicate 95%CIs. Statistical significance: red, P ≤ 0.001; yellow, P ≤ 0.01; blue, P ≤ 0.05; black, P > 0.05. MDH represents minimum human population density within distribution areas. Order-specific analyses showed that both geographic range area and urban-adaptation status were generally positively correlated with human-associated microbial metrics (e.g., the richness and transmission capacity; Fig. 3a and Table S6–Table S8). Habitat diversity was also generally positively associated with the human-associated microbial metrics in both insectivores and rodents ( Fig. 3c and Fig. 3d ) but not bats ( Fig. 3e ). For life-history traits, longevity was generally positively correlated with the human-associated microbial metrics in all three orders. Gestation time showed negative relationships with human-associated microbial richness in insectivores as well as with total microbe transmission capacity in both insectivores and bats. In contrast, body mass and litter size showed order-specific effects ( Fig. 3a , Fig. 3c and Fig. 3d ). Increased body mass enhanced human-associated microbial transmission capacity in insectivores (β = 0.28, P = 0.031) but suppressed human-associated microbial richness in rodents (β = −0.74, P < 0.001). Similarly, litter size positively correlated with human-associated microbial transmission capacity in rodents (β = 0.21, P < 0.001). In addition, migration behavior was uniquely associated with human-associated microbial metrics in bats ( Fig. 3e ). We observed similar patterns of ecological drivers for microbial richness and transmission across both total and human-associated microbes (see Supplementary Information). Best-fit PGLS models are detailed in Tables S9–S12. Expanding hotspots of zoonotic risk We conducted spatially explicit analyses to quantify human-associated microbial transmission risks across insectivores, rodents, and bats for the 2015 baseline (representing 2000–2030 averaged climate conditions) and 2035 projections (2020–2050 averaged climate conditions) under SSP1 and SSP3 scenarios. The 2015 baseline revealed order-specific risk patterns. Insectivore-associated, high-risk hotspots primarily occurred in Eurasia (Eastern/Southern Europe and East/Southeast Asia; Fig. 4b ). Rodent-associated hotspots were concentrated in Eurasia (Southern/Central Europe and East/South/Southeast Asia) and North Africa ( Fig. 4c ). Bat-associated hotspots were prominent in tropical regions, including northern South America, Central Africa, and coastal Southeast Asia ( Fig. 4d ). Overall, hotspots for the combined target host orders exhibited spatial convergence with the rodent-associated risk patterns ( Fig. 4a ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Global patterns of human-associated microbial transmission risk in insectivores, rodents, and bats in 2015. Predicted spatial distribution of hotspots for human-associated microbial transmission risk in a) the pooled host orders, b) insectivores, c) rodents, and d) bats. Darker shading indicates higher transmission risk, and red areas represent high-risk hotspot regions. Projected risk landscapes for 2035 under SSP1 revealed a substantial expansion of high-risk areas ( Fig. 5 , Fig. S7–Fig. S10). Notably, insectivores emerged as the predominant transmission host in new high-latitude hotspots, including parts of the United States, Canada, and Russia, surpassing the relative risk contribution of rodents and bats ( Fig. 5e ). In addition to the persistence of core 2015 hotspots, this order also demonstrated expansive emerging risk across temperate regions of East Asia, North America, and Europe ( Fig. 5c ). In contrast, rodent-associated emerging risk areas developed primarily in southwestern North America, South America, Central/West Africa, and Australia (Fig. S9). Bat-associated emerging risk areas were concentrated mainly in Eastern/Southern Africa, East Asia, and Europe (Fig. S10). Overall, emerging risk areas for the combined target host orders showed spatial patterns similar to rodents ( Fig. 5a ). SSP3 projections indicated less spatial expansion of risk areas than SSP1 ( Fig. 5 , Fig. S8–Fig. S10). The spatial distributions of transmission risk from total and human-associated microbes were highly similar (Fig. S7–Fig. S10). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Projected global patterns of human-associated microbial transmission risk in insectivores, rodents, and bats under 2035 climate change scenarios. Predicted spatial distribution of hotspots for human-associated microbial transmission risk in the pooled host orders under a) SSP1 and b) SSP3. Predicted spatial distribution of hotspots for human-associated microbial transmission risk in insectivores under c) SSP1 and d) SSP3. In panels a)-d), darker shading indicates higher transmission risk; red areas represent high-risk hotspot regions, while blue highlights areas with >20% increased transmission risk between 2015 and 2035, suggesting emergent risk zones. The proportion of human-associated microbial transmission risk attributable to insectivores among the pooled host orders under e) SSP1 and f) SSP3. Regions in red (proportion >0.34) denote areas where insectivores are predicted to be the dominant source relative to rodents and bats. Finally, using a global database of historical EID events (1970–2016), we analyzed associations between predicted human-associated microbial transmission risk in 2015 and global EID risk. Our GLMM with continent as a random factor explained 95.36% of global EID risk variation (conditional R 2 ), with 20.32% explained by microbial transmission risk (marginal R ²; β = 0.316, P = 0.028). This provides strong empirical validation that areas with higher predicted transmission risk in our target host orders were significantly more likely to have experienced emerging disease outbreaks in the recent past. Notably, predictive performance varied by continent, with Europe (44.3%) and North America (39.8%) showing the strongest associations, while Oceania (7.9%) and Asia (0.149%) exhibited minimal explanatory power. Discussion Insectivores as equally critical microbe reservoirs In this study, we took a macroecological approach to investigate microbial hosting and transmission dynamics across insectivores, rodents, and bats. Counter to the prevailing paradigm favoring rodents and bats as special reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens 11 , our analyses demonstrate that insectivores host comparable richness of microbes to rodents and bats. Moreover, insectivores exhibited superior efficiency not only in intra-order transmission, but also in cross-order transmission, relative to bats and rodents. These findings establish insectivores as pivotal yet neglected players in disease ecology, compelling their systematic incorporation into global zoonotic risk assessments. Our findings align with emerging evidence identifying insectivores as significant reservoir hosts for multiple pathogens 63 – 65 . Hedgehogs, for example, have been recognized as amplifying hosts for SFTSV 21 , 66 , 67 , which the World Health Organization has included on its list of priority pathogens with pandemic potential in both 2017 and 2024. Hedgehogs may also constitute a reservoir for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying mecC 68 , 69 . Shrews have been considered as natural reservoirs of the Langya henipavirus, which is a close relative of the Hendra and Nipah viruses 22 . Certain insectivore species (e.g., Smith’s shrew [ Chodsigoa smithii ]) host more viruses than some species of rodents and bats 3 . Furthermore, our recent work demonstrated that insectivores, specifically shrews and hedgehogs, contribute significantly to the global virus sharing networks among mammal species, hosting many cross-order transmitted viruses 8 . Ecological drivers of microbial richness and transmission We explored and compared the ecological factors driving microbe richness and transmission capacity across these three host orders, identifying both shared and order-specific drivers. For example, most habitat-related factors showed positive correlations with microbe richness and transmission capacity in all orders, except habitat diversity, which showed no relationship in bats. These positive effects may generally reflect increased microbe exposure, a key process in host–microbe interactions 70 , 71 . Species with larger geographic ranges, greater habitat diversity, and urban adaptation also experienced higher microbe contact, which could likewise indicate greater within- and between-species transmission opportunities, including spillback from humans 72 . Additionally, longevity generally correlated positively with microbe richness and transmission capacity across all groups, likely because long-lived species have greater cumulative exposure to microbes 73 , 74 . Besides the shared drivers, we also identified several order-specific drivers for species’ microbial richness and transmission capacity. For rodents, we found that species with smaller body mass and larger litter sizes, and therefore a faster pace of life, showed higher microbial richness and transmission capacity. These results are thereby consistent with life-history theory, which posits that such fast-lived species typically invest less in immune defense than in reproduction and are thus more susceptible to microbes 75 , 76 . However, we found that the effects of body mass and litter size in insectivores were opposite to those in rodents. Such opposing patterns in insectivores might be explained by exposure processes. Within insectivores, small-bodied species often exhibit strict insectivory due to their high metabolic rates 77 . In contrast, larger-bodied species (e.g., hedgehogs 78 , 79 ), owing to their greater absolute energy requirements, may have larger home ranges 80 , 81 and exhibit opportunistic omnivory, which could expose them to a greater diversity of microbes. We also found that migratory bat species host more human-associated microbes than non-migratory bat species, which could likewise reflect such species sampling a greater diversity of habitats and, as such, being exposed to more microbes 82 . Implications of expanding transmission risks for public health preparedness Our spatial projections based on climate change scenarios revealed a concerning expansion of insectivore-linked high-risk zones for microbial transmission by 2035. Under SSP1 climate scenarios, insectivore-driven spillover risk will increase across temperate regions of East Asia, North America, and Europe. Notably, insectivores are forecasted to surpass rodents and bats and emerge as the predominant transmission hosts in new high-latitude hotspots, including parts of the US, Canada, and Russia, likely driven by climate advantages in their range, abundance, or vector associations. The European shrew, identified as the most central species in microbial transmission networks, may amplify spillover threats and potentially trigger regional public health crises. Our data underscores how climate change fundamentally reconfigures host–microbe networks, elevating insectivores from neglected actors to central drivers of emerging spillover risk, demanding a commensurate shift in surveillance paradigms. Our findings establish insectivores as critical hosts of underestimated microbial diversity with significant zoonotic potential, compelling their prioritization in proactive surveillance systems for emerging infectious diseases. We propose the immediate incorporation of insectivores into existing surveillance programs, with targeted focus on high-risk species such as the European shrew and on geographic hotspots to comprehensively map pathogen diversity and quantify zoonotic risk. Concurrently, integrating multi-omics approaches could reveal how insectivores’ biological traits contribute to their maintenance and transmission of diverse pathogens to advance mechanistic insights into zoonotic spillover 83 . Furthermore, implementing One Health sentinel networks that synergize environmental surveillance, point-of-care animal testing, and human digital epidemiology would establish early-warning systems across high-risk interfaces, translating ecological insights into public health intervention protocols 84 . Public health agencies in areas with high insectivore biodiversity should prioritize community education about safe handling of these animals. These collective actions will bridge the critical preparedness gaps exposed by neglected insectivores. Limitations We applied rigorous measures to mitigate the impact of inherent data biases on our major findings. Our rarefaction curves and PGLS demonstrated that increased sampling effort enhanced microbial richness in insectivores, rodents, and bats. Independent analyses for human-associated microbes, viruses, and bacteria were conducted to address group-specific bias. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that inherent data biases, including temporal and geographic sampling gaps, may skew microbial richness and cross-species transmission comparisons. Additionally, findings on microbe-sharing dynamics and zoonotic potential warrant cautious interpretation, particularly as our network-based framework cannot conclusively exclude alternative transmission scenarios. Our analyses did not distinguish non-vector from vector transmission, although the latter represents an important transmission pathway for certain pathogens in wild small mammals. While our analysis delineates potential cross-species transmission risks, combined evidence from viral isolation and genomic sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, epidemiological contact tracing, and serological profiling are needed to validate definitive transmission routes. Conclusions In summary, our findings demonstrate that insectivores pose a substantially greater zoonotic risk than previously acknowledged, evidenced by their comparable microbial diversity, higher transmission efficiency, and elevated spillover potential. Collectively, insectivores, rodents, and bats constitute essential zoonotic host orders, a role sustained by distinct ecological traits that promote pathogen maintenance and spillover. Consequently, proactive surveillance of these taxa is imperative for early warning of emerging zoonotic threats prior to spillover events. Competing interests None declared. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32470561, YFX, 32271605, ZYXH) and Taishan Scholars Project (tsqn202306003, YFX). DJB was supported by the National Science Foundation (DBI 2515340) and the Edward Mallinckrodt, Jr. Foundation. References 1. ↵ Jones , K. E. et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases . Nature 451 , 990 – 993 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 2. ↵ Olival , K. J. et al. Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals . Nature 546 , 646 – 650 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Chen , Y.-M. et al. Host traits shape virome composition and virus transmission in wild small mammals . Cell 186 , 4662 – 4675.e12 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. Wu , Z. et al. Comparative analysis of rodent and small mammal viromes to better understand the wildlife origin of emerging infectious diseases . Microbiome 6 , 178 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Zhang , N. et al. Virome landscape of wild rodents and shrews in Central China . Microbiome 13 , 63 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Letko , M. , Seifert , S. N. , Olival , K. J. , Plowright , R. K. & Munster , V. J . Bat-borne virus diversity, spillover and emergence . Nat Rev Microbiol 18 , 461 – 471 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Luis , A. D. et al. A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special? Proc Biol Sci 280 , 20122753 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Li , H. et al. Diversity and transmission and zoonotic potential of microbes in true insectivores . Nat Commun 16 , 6709 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl PubMed 9. ↵ Szentivanyi , T. , McKee , C. , Jones , G. & Foster , J. T . Trends in Bacterial Pathogens of Bats: Global Distribution and Knowledge Gaps . Transbound Emerg Dis 2023 , 9285855 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 10. ↵ Shaw , L. P. et al. The phylogenetic range of bacterial and viral pathogens of vertebrates . Mol Ecol 29 , 3361 – 3379 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Mollentze , N. & Streicker , D. G . Viral zoonotic risk is homogenous among taxonomic orders of mammalian and avian reservoir hosts . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117 , 9423 – 9430 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 12. ↵ Van Brussel , K. & Holmes , E. C . Zoonotic disease and virome diversity in bats . Curr Opin Virol 52 , 192 – 202 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. Wang , J. et al. Individual bat virome analysis reveals co-infection and spillover among bats and virus zoonotic potential . Nat Commun 14 , 4079 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. Han , B. A. , Schmidt , J. P. , Bowden , S. E. & Drake , J. M . Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 , 7039 – 7044 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 15. ↵ Yan , X. et al. A compendium of 8,176 bat RNA viral metagenomes reveals ecological drivers and circulation dynamics . Nat Microbiol 10 , 554 – 568 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl PubMed 16. ↵ Irving , A. T. , Ahn , M. , Goh , G. , Anderson , D. E. & Wang , L.-F . Lessons from the host defences of bats, a unique viral reservoir . Nature 589 , 363 – 370 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Dai , Y. et al. Increased viral tolerance mediates by antiviral RNA interference in bat cells . Cell Rep 43 , 114581 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 18. ↵ Albery , G. F. & Becker , D. J. Fast-lived Hosts and Zoonotic Risk . Trends Parasitol 37 , 117 – 129 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Böhmer , M. M. et al. One Health in action: Investigation of the first detected local cluster of fatal borna disease virus 1 (BoDV-1) encephalitis, Germany 2022 . Journal of Clinical Virology 171 , 105658 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. Guo , W.-P. et al. Phylogeny and Origins of Hantaviruses Harbored by Bats, Insectivores, and Rodents . PLoS Pathog 9 , e1003159 - ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Zhao , C. et al. Hedgehogs as Amplifying Hosts of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus , China. Emerging Infectious Disease journal 28 , 2491 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl 22. ↵ Zhang , X.-A. et al. A Zoonotic Henipavirus in Febrile Patients in China . New England Journal of Medicine 387 , 470 – 472 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Li , D. et al. MERS-related CoVs in hedgehogs from Hubei Province, China . One Health 13 , 100332 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 24. ↵ Carlson , C. J. et al. Climate change increases cross-species viral transmission risk . Nature 607 , 555 – 562 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Pecl , G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being . Science 355 , ( 2017 ). 26. ↵ Carlson , C. J. et al. The Global Virome in One Network (VIRION): an Atlas of Vertebrate-Virus Associations . mBio 13 , e0298521 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Wardeh , M. , Risley , C. , McIntyre , M. K. , Setzkorn , C. & Baylis , M . Database of host-pathogen and related species interactions, and their global distribution . Sci Data 2 , 150049 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl PubMed 28. ↵ Gibb , R. et al. Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems . Nature 584 , 398 – 402 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. ↵ Dixon , P . VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology . Journal of Vegetation Science 14 , 927 – 930 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 30. ↵ Faurby , S. et al. PHYLACINE 1.2: The Phylogenetic Atlas of Mammal Macroecology . Ecology 99 , 2626 – 2626 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Cox , D. T. C. , Gardner , A. S. & Gaston , K. J . Diel niche variation in mammals associated with expanded trait space . Nat Commun 12 , 1753 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Revell , L. J. , Harmon , L. J. & Collar , D. C. Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate . Syst Biol 57 , 591 – 601 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 33. Freckleton , R. P. , Harvey , P. H. & Pagel , M . Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence . Am Nat 160 , 712 – 726 ( 2002 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Philippe Massicotte and Andy South . rnaturalearth: World Map Data from Natural Earth . ( 2025 ). 35. ↵ Ho , L. S. T. & Ane , C. phylolm: Phylogenetic Linear Regression . CRAN: Contributed Packages Preprint at doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.phylolm ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 36. ↵ Tang , H. et al. TensorFlow solver for quantum PageRank in large-scale networks . Sci Bull (Beijing) 66 , 120 – 126 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 37. ↵ Gómez , J. M. , Nunn , C. L. & Verdú , M . Centrality in primate–parasite networks reveals the potential for the transmission of emerging infectious diseases to humans . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 , 7738 – 7741 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 38. ↵ Nunn , C. L. , Altizer , S. , Jones , K. E. & Sechrest , W . Comparative Tests of Parasite Species Richness in Primates . Am Nat 162 , 597 – 614 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 39. ↵ Luis , A. D. et al. Network analysis of host-virus communities in bats and rodents reveals determinants of cross-species transmission . Ecol Lett 18 , 1153 – 1162 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Wang , Y. X. G. et al. Phylogenetic structure of wildlife assemblages shapes patterns of infectious livestock diseases in Africa . Funct Ecol 33 , 1332 – 1341 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl 41. ↵ Wille , M. et al. Strong host phylogenetic and ecological effects on host competency for avian influenza in Australian wild birds . Proc Biol Sci 290 , 20222237 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Blondel , V. D. , Guillaume , J.-L. , Lambiotte , R. & Lefebvre , E . Fast unfolding of communities in large networks . Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 , P10008 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 43. Pandit , P. S. et al. Predicting the potential for zoonotic transmission and host associations for novel viruses . Commun Biol 5 , 844 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 44. ↵ Newman , M. E. J . Modularity and community structure in networks . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 , 8577 – 8582 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 45. ↵ Wilman , H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: SpeciesLlevel foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals . Ecology 95 , 2027 – 2027 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 46. ↵ De MagalhÃes , J. P. & Costa , J. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other lifeLhistory traits . J Evol Biol 22 , 1770 – 1774 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 47. ↵ Jones , K. E. et al. PanTHERIA: a speciesLlevel database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals . Ecology 90 , 2648 – 2648 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 48. ↵ Myhrvold , N. P. et al. An amniote lifeLhistory database to perform comparative analyses with birds, mammals, and reptiles . Ecology 96 , 3109 – 3109 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 49. ↵ IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2019-2 (IUCN, 2019) ; https://www.iucnredlist.org’. 50. ↵ Santini , L. et al. One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals . Ecol Lett 22 , 365 – 376 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Stekhoven , D. J. & Bühlmann , P . MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data . Bioinformatics 28 , 112 – 118 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 52. ↵ Yin , S. et al. Functional traits explain waterbirds’ host status, subtype richness, and communityLlevel infection risk for avian influenza . Ecol Lett 26 , 1780 – 1791 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. ↵ Price , S. A . The Comparative Approach in Evolutionary Anthropology and Biology . —Charles L. Nunn. Syst Biol 61 , 1085 – 1086 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl 54. ↵ Tung Ho , L. si & Ané , C . A Linear-Time Algorithm for Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Trait Evolution Models . Syst Biol 63 , 397 – 408 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Model Selection and Multimodel Inference . ( Springer New York , New York, NY , 2004 ). doi: 10.1007/b97636 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ Bartoń , K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference . CRAN: Contributed Packages Preprint at doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.MuMIn ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 57. ↵ Wang , Y. X. G. et al. Mammal assemblage composition predicts global patterns in emerging infectious disease risk . Glob Chang Biol 27 , 4995 – 5007 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 58. Santini , L. , BenítezLLópez , A. , Dormann , C. F. & Huijbregts , M. A. J . Population density estimates for terrestrial mammal species . Global Ecology and Biogeography 31 , 978 – 994 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl 59. ↵ Santini , L. , BenítezLLópez , A. , Maiorano , L. , Čengić , M. & Huijbregts , M. A. J . Assessing the reliability of species distribution projections in climate change research . Divers Distrib 27 , 1035 – 1050 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl 60. ↵ O’Neill , B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways . Clim Change 122 , 387 – 400 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl 61. ↵ McGillycuddy , M. , Warton , D. I. , Popovic , G. & Bolker , B. M . Parsimoniously Fitting Large Multivariate Random Effects in glmmTMB . J Stat Softw 112 , ( 2025 ). 62. ↵ Allen , T. et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases . Nat Commun 8 , 1124 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Jin-Won , S. et al. Characterization of Imjin Virus, a Newly Isolated Hantavirus from the Ussuri White-Toothed Shrew (Crocidura lasiura) . J Virol 83 , 6184 – 6191 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 64. Goethert , H. K. , Mather , T. N. , Johnson , R. W. & Telford , S. R . Incrimination of shrews as a reservoir for Powassan virus . Commun Biol 4 , 1319 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl PubMed 65. ↵ Hilbe , M. et al. Shrews as Reservoir Hosts of Borna Disease Virus . Emerging Infectious Disease journal 12 , 675 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl 66. ↵ Sun , Y. et al. Seroprevalence of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus in Hedgehog from China . Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 17 , 347 – 350 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl 67. ↵ Zhang , X. , Zhao , C. , Si , X. , Hu , Q. & Zheng , A . Natural circulation of tick-borne severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in the city ecosystem, China . Virol Sin 38 , 832 – 835 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Larsen , J. et al. Emergence of methicillin resistance predates the clinical use of antibiotics . Nature 602 , 135 – 141 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ Rasmussen , S. L. et al. European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) as a natural reservoir of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying mecC in Denmark . PLoS One 14 , e0222031 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 70. ↵ Gutiérrez , J. S. , Piersma , T. & Thieltges , D. W . Micro- and macroparasite species richness in birds: The role of host life history and ecology . J Anim Ecol 88 , 1226 – 1239 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 71. ↵ Bordes , F. , Morand , S. , Kelt , D. A. & Van Vuren , D. H . Home range and parasite diversity in mammals . Am Nat 173 , 467 – 74 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl PubMed 72. ↵ Fagre , A. C. et al. Assessing the risk of human-to-wildlife pathogen transmission for conservation and public health . Ecol Lett 25 , 1534 – 1549 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ Xu , Y. et al. Slow-lived birds and bats carry higher pathogen loads . One Earth 7 , 1121 – 1132 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl 74. ↵ Cooper , N. , Kamilar , J. M. & Nunn , C. L . Host longevity and parasite species richness in mammals . PLoS One 7 , e42190 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl PubMed 75. ↵ Previtali , M. A. et al. Relationship between pace of life and immune responses in wild rodents . Oikos 121 , 1483 – 1492 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 76. ↵ Lee , K. A . Linking immune defenses and life history at the levels of the individual and the species . Integr Comp Biol 46 , 1000 – 15 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 77. ↵ Rychlik , L . Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes . Behavioral Ecology 13 , 216 – 223 ( 2002 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 78. ↵ Jones , C. , Moss , K. & Sanders , M. Diet of Hedgehogs (Erinaceus Europaeus) in the Upper Waitaki Basin, New Zealand: Implications for Conservation . New Zealand Journal of Ecology vol. 29 http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje ( 2005 ). 79. ↵ Rautio , A. , Isomursu , M. , Valtonen , A. , Hirvelä-Koski , V. & Kunnasranta , M . Mortality, diseases and diet of European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in an urban environment in Finland . Mamm Res 61 , 161 – 169 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl 80. ↵ Tucker , M. A. , Ord , T. J. & Rogers , T. L . Evolutionary predictors of mammalian home range size: body mass, diet and the environment . Global Ecology and Biogeography 23 , 1105 – 1114 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl 81. ↵ Broekman , M. J. E. et al. Environmental drivers of global variation in home range size of terrestrial and marine mammals . Journal of Animal Ecology 93 , 488 – 500 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 82. ↵ Altizer , S. , Bartel , R. & Han , B. A . Animal migration and infectious disease risk . Science 331 , 296 – 302 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 83. ↵ Vicente-Santos , A. , Herrera , N. S. , Czirják , G. Á. , Neely , B. A. & Becker , D. J . Proteomics approaches to ecoimmunology: new insights into wildlife immunity and disease . Integr Comp Biol ( 2025 ) doi: 10.1093/icb/icaf044 . OpenUrl CrossRef 84. ↵ Gardy , J. L. & Loman , N. J . Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system . Nat Rev Genet 19 , 9 – 20 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 16, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats Hongfeng Li , Zheng Y.X. Huang , Jie Lan , Li Hu , Zhilin Wang , Yingying Wang , Luca Santini , Daniel J. Becker , Fuwen Wei , Yifei Xu bioRxiv 2025.09.10.675328; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675328 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats Hongfeng Li , Zheng Y.X. Huang , Jie Lan , Li Hu , Zhilin Wang , Yingying Wang , Luca Santini , Daniel J. Becker , Fuwen Wei , Yifei Xu bioRxiv 2025.09.10.675328; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.10.675328 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Ecology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7618) Biochemistry (17633) Bioengineering (13856) Bioinformatics (41841) Biophysics (21399) Cancer Biology (18529) Cell Biology (25422) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13352) Ecology (19860) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24282) Genetics (15582) Genomics (22462) Immunology (17700) Microbiology (40295) Molecular Biology (17140) Neuroscience (88419) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2823) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4813) Physiology (7632) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4284) Systems Biology (9808) Zoology (2267)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.