Abstract
The rehabilitation of mine-impacted areas through ecological restoration can ensure long-term ecosystem resilience by reestablishing at least part of the original biodiversity. In New Caledonia, large surfaces of mined land need to be restored. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are abundant in New Caledonian serpentine (ultramafic) ecosystems and play important roles in plant development and adaptation to environmental stresses. In a greenhouse experiment using the endemic shrub Metrosideros laurifolia, we compared the functional effects of AMF community extracted from a lateritic subsoil restored 20 years ago with that extracted from a reference soil corresponding to a bordering dense shrubby maquis. In the restored subsoil, deficient in major mineral elements, the two AMF communities did not improve plant growth, unlike in the reference soil, where a strong mycorrhizal growth response was observed. Moreover, in the reference soil, mineral nutrition was more stimulated by the AMF community from the same soil than that from the restored soil, and metal concentrations in plant organs were globally lower in plants inoculated with AMF from the reference soil. In the restored soil, global microbial activity was higher in the presence of the AMF community from the reference soil than in the restored soil. All these results suggest that the AMF community that evolved in the restored substrate was less efficient at promoting plant development than that in the reference soil.
Full text
7,117 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Compared effects on Metrosideros laurifolia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities from restored lateritic subsoil and reference ultramafic soil. | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 13 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Compared effects on Metrosideros laurifolia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities from restored lateritic subsoil and reference ultramafic soil. Authors : Hamid Amir 0000-0001-9777-4050 [email protected] , Aurore Martini , Valértie Médevielle , and Yvon Cavaloc Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176826796.62402425/v1 101 views 65 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract The rehabilitation of mine-impacted areas through ecological restoration can ensure long-term ecosystem resilience by reestablishing at least part of the original biodiversity. In New Caledonia, large surfaces of mined land need to be restored. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are abundant in New Caledonian serpentine (ultramafic) ecosystems and play important roles in plant development and adaptation to environmental stresses. In a greenhouse experiment using the endemic shrub Metrosideros laurifolia, we compared the functional effects of AMF community extracted from a lateritic subsoil restored 20 years ago with that extracted from a reference soil corresponding to a bordering dense shrubby maquis. In the restored subsoil, deficient in major mineral elements, the two AMF communities did not improve plant growth, unlike in the reference soil, where a strong mycorrhizal growth response was observed. Moreover, in the reference soil, mineral nutrition was more stimulated by the AMF community from the same soil than that from the restored soil, and metal concentrations in plant organs were globally lower in plants inoculated with AMF from the reference soil. In the restored soil, global microbial activity was higher in the presence of the AMF community from the reference soil than in the restored soil. All these results suggest that the AMF community that evolved in the restored substrate was less efficient at promoting plant development than that in the reference soil. Supplementary Material File (amir et al. figures def.pdf) Download 715.05 KB File (amir et al. text.doc) Download 221.50 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 13 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords 32: conservation 41: experimental ecology amf communities arbuscular mycorrhiza ecological restoration metals mycorrhiza restoration ultramafic soils Authors Affiliations Hamid Amir 0000-0001-9777-4050 [email protected] Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie View all articles by this author Aurore Martini Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie View all articles by this author Valértie Médevielle Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie View all articles by this author Yvon Cavaloc Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 101 views 65 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Hamid Amir, Aurore Martini, Valértie Médevielle, et al. Compared effects on Metrosideros laurifolia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities from restored lateritic subsoil and reference ultramafic soil.. Authorea . 13 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176826796.62402425/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176826796.62402425/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe111be683b0708',t:'MTc3OTE3MjM5Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.