Abstract
Detecting sensitive data such as Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Protected Health Information (PHI) is critical for data security platforms.[1] This study evaluates regex-based pattern matching algorithms and exact-match search techniques to optimize detection speed, accuracy, and scalability. Our benchmarking results indicate that Google RE2 provides the best balance of speed (10-15 ms/MB), memory efficiency (8-16 MB), and accuracy (99.5%) among regex engines, outperforming PCRE while maintaining broader hardware compatibility than Hyperscan. For exact matching, Aho-Corasick demonstrated superior performance (8 ms/MB) and scalability for large datasets. Performance analysis revealed that regex processing time scales linearly with dataset size and pattern complexity. A hybrid AI + Regex approach achieved the highest F1 score (91. 6%) by improving recall and minimizing false positives. Device benchmarking confirmed that our solution maintains efficient CPU and memory usage on both high-performance and mid-range systems. Despite its effectiveness, challenges remain, such as limited multilingual support and the need for regular pattern updates.[2] Future work should focus on expanding language coverage, integrating data security and privacy management (DSPM) with data loss prevention (DLP) tools, and enhancing regulatory compliance for broader global adoption.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.