Oral versus extended-release injectable naltrexone emetic event reporting in opioid-exposed FAERS: a PAMORA-referenced analysis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose: To compare nausea/vomiting reporting signals for oral naltrexone versus extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX; Vivitrol) and benchmark against peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). Methods: : Retrospective disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports accessed via openFDA. The reporting universe was opioid-exposed reports in the primary window (March 24, 2018–October 30, 2025). Primary-suspect exposures were oral naltrexone, XR-NTX, and PAMORAs. Outcomes were MedDRA preferred terms for nausea and vomiting. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CIs were estimated, and repeated in a serious outcome subset (hospitalization or death) and a historical window (2004–2024). Results: : The opioid-exposed universe comprised 620,921 reports (primary-suspect totals: oral naltrexone n=330; XR-NTX n=1,067; PAMORAs n=2,818). Across all reports, oral naltrexone showed the strongest emetic signals (nausea ROR 4.09, 95% CI 3.09–5.41; vomiting ROR 4.00, 2.91–5.50), XR-NTX was intermediate (nausea ROR 1.68, 1.35–2.08; vomiting ROR 2.05, 1.63–2.59), and PAMORAs were modest (nausea ROR 1.66, 1.45–1.90; vomiting ROR 1.37, 1.16–1.63). Patterns were directionally consistent in the serious outcome subset and in the historical reference window. Conclusions: : In an opioid-exposed FAERS universe, oral naltrexone exhibited substantially stronger nausea/vomiting disproportionality than XR-NTX, while PAMORAs provided a comparatively modest reference profile. This divergence suggests peripheral μ-receptor antagonism alone is unlikely to fully explain formulation-related emetic reporting differences, supporting a role for formulation-dependent pharmacokinetics or non-peripheral contributors.
Full text 6,876 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Oral versus extended-release injectable naltrexone emetic event reporting in opioid-exposed FAERS: a PAMORA-referenced analysis | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 20 February 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Oral versus extended-release injectable naltrexone emetic event reporting in opioid-exposed FAERS: a PAMORA-referenced analysis Authors : Liyao Huang and Xuhui Zhou 0000-0002-5423-8861 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177156371.13770902/v1 89 views 46 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Purpose: To compare nausea/vomiting reporting signals for oral naltrexone versus extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX; Vivitrol) and benchmark against peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). Methods: Retrospective disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports accessed via openFDA. The reporting universe was opioid-exposed reports in the primary window (March 24, 2018–October 30, 2025). Primary-suspect exposures were oral naltrexone, XR-NTX, and PAMORAs. Outcomes were MedDRA preferred terms for nausea and vomiting. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CIs were estimated, and repeated in a serious outcome subset (hospitalization or death) and a historical window (2004–2024). Results: The opioid-exposed universe comprised 620,921 reports (primary-suspect totals: oral naltrexone n=330; XR-NTX n=1,067; PAMORAs n=2,818). Across all reports, oral naltrexone showed the strongest emetic signals (nausea ROR 4.09, 95% CI 3.09–5.41; vomiting ROR 4.00, 2.91–5.50), XR-NTX was intermediate (nausea ROR 1.68, 1.35–2.08; vomiting ROR 2.05, 1.63–2.59), and PAMORAs were modest (nausea ROR 1.66, 1.45–1.90; vomiting ROR 1.37, 1.16–1.63). Patterns were directionally consistent in the serious outcome subset and in the historical reference window. Conclusions: In an opioid-exposed FAERS universe, oral naltrexone exhibited substantially stronger nausea/vomiting disproportionality than XR-NTX, while PAMORAs provided a comparatively modest reference profile. This divergence suggests peripheral μ-receptor antagonism alone is unlikely to fully explain formulation-related emetic reporting differences, supporting a role for formulation-dependent pharmacokinetics or non-peripheral contributors. Supplementary Material File (pds-26-0155-file001.docx) Download 45.84 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 20 February 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords faers naltrexone nausea openfda pamora vomiting Authors Affiliations Liyao Huang Hunan University of Chinese Medicine View all articles by this author Xuhui Zhou 0000-0002-5423-8861 [email protected] Hunan University of Chinese Medicine View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 89 views 46 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Liyao Huang, Xuhui Zhou. Oral versus extended-release injectable naltrexone emetic event reporting in opioid-exposed FAERS: a PAMORA-referenced analysis. Authorea . 20 February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177156371.13770902/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177156371.13770902/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe109c06e2e06eb',t:'MTc3OTE3MjA3MA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00