Abstract
The center surround structure of ganglion cells receptive fields is suited for edge detection, a first step towards image segmentation. However, in a dynamical visual scene with moving, textured objects, it is less clear how the retina represents the local boundaries of these objects. Here, we show that the spatial selectivity of ganglion cells changes during their responses to a moving object. Specific cell types only respond to contrast changes near the edges of the moving object, while being insensitive to changes in other parts of their receptive field. Using a non-linear model to reproduce this result, we could isolate the mechanism responsible for this selective representation. These types of ganglion cells represent selectively textures only when they are near moving edges, and may thus provide useful primitives for motion segmentation.
Full text
1,005 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
The center surround structure of ganglion cells receptive fields is suited for edge detection, a first step towards image segmentation. However, in a dynamical visual scene with moving, textured objects, it is less clear how the retina represents the local boundaries of these objects. Here, we show that the spatial selectivity of ganglion cells changes during their responses to a moving object. Specific cell types only respond to contrast changes near the edges of the moving object, while being insensitive to changes in other parts of their receptive field. Using a non-linear model to reproduce this result, we could isolate the mechanism responsible for this selective representation. These types of ganglion cells represent selectively textures only when they are near moving edges, and may thus provide useful primitives for motion segmentation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
One illustrative figure was added in the discussion.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.