Improving eDNA filtration and purification for qPCR detection of Schistosoma mansoni in lakes Albert and Victoria

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This study assessed how well environmental DNA (eDNA) can detect Schistosoma mansoni in water from Lakes Albert and Victoria, Uganda, comparing three eDNA filtration devices (open membrane, Waterra, and Sylphium capsule filters) and two DNA purification approaches. Using a SYBR Green qPCR assay targeting the mitochondrial COI gene, the authors reported a practical qPCR limit of detection of 100 copies per reaction (and a theoretical LOD/LOQ of 83 copies), with amplification in most technical replicates down to single-copy inputs. S. mansoni eDNA was detected on 58.1% of filters from Lake Albert versus 19.2% from Lake Victoria, with Waterra yielding the highest DNA concentrations and Sylphium precipitation producing higher eDNA yield than column-based kits, while detection rates remained consistent despite filtration-to-filtration recovery variation. The paper does not explicitly state a limitation in the abstract, but detection performance was evaluated alongside environmental covariates (turbidity and TDS), with no significant correlation to detectability, and malacological surveys were used for validation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Schistosomiasis, a parasitic disease caused by Schistosoma trematodes, remains a significant public health burden in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene. Effective disease control strategies rely on large-scale surveillance to accurately identify and target high-risk populations. However, traditional methods such as malacological surveys and stool/urine microscopy in humans often lack sensitivity and scalability. Environmental DNA (eDNA) is emerging as a promising tool for non-invasive surveillance of aquatic pathogens, offering enhanced sensitivity and feasibility for large-scale monitoring. Methods This study evaluated the efficacy of eDNA-based detection of Schistosoma mansoni in water samples from Lake Albert and Lake Victoria, Uganda. Three eDNA filtration techniques: open membrane, Waterra capsule and Sylphium capsule filters, were compared for DNA yield and detection efficiency. SYBR Green quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was performed to quantify S. mansoni eDNA, following in silico and in vitro optimisation of primers. Conventional malacological surveys were conducted in parallel to validate eDNA findings, and statistical analyses examined the influence of environmental factors (turbidity and total dissolved solids (TDS)) on eDNA yield and detection rates. Results The SYBR Green S. mansoni qPCR assay had a practical limit of detection (LOD), defined as amplification in >95% of 33 technical replicates, of 100 copies per reaction. The assay amplified in 82% of reactions with 10 DNA copies and 76% with a single copy. The theoretical LOD, determined via amplification probabilities in RStudio, was 83 copies per reaction, which was also the calculated limit of quantification (LOQ). Schistosoma mansoni eDNA was detected in 58.1% (25/43) of filters from Lake Albert and 19.2% (10/52) from Lake Victoria. The Waterra capsule filter yielded the highest eDNA concentrations, while the Sylphium-coupled capsule filter exhibited comparable detection efficiency. Among the DNA purification methods tested, the Sylphium precipitation-based protocol produced significantly higher eDNA yield than column-based kits (DNeasy Blood and Tissue and Zymo Research). Despite significant variation in eDNA recovery across filtration methods, qPCR detection rates were consistent. No significant correlation was observed between turbidity and S. mansoni eDNA detectability. Conclusion Our findings highlight the potential of eDNA as a sensitive, scalable tool for schistosomiasis surveillance. While Waterra filters and Sylphium extraction maximised DNA yield, lower-yield filtration methods still enabled S. mansoni detection in high-transmission settings. These findings support the adaptability of eDNA approaches across varying resource contexts. Future work should prioritise protocol standardisation, ecological validation, and development of field-ready diagnostics such as LAMP to enable broader implementation in endemic regions.
Full text 3,197 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Schistosomiasis, a parasitic disease caused by Schistosoma trematodes, remains a significant public health burden in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene. Effective disease control strategies rely on large-scale surveillance to accurately identify and target high-risk populations. However, traditional methods such as malacological surveys and stool/urine microscopy in humans often lack sensitivity and scalability. Environmental DNA (eDNA) is emerging as a promising tool for non-invasive surveillance of aquatic pathogens, offering enhanced sensitivity and feasibility for large-scale monitoring.

Methods

This study evaluated the efficacy of eDNA-based detection of Schistosoma mansoni in water samples from Lake Albert and Lake Victoria, Uganda. Three eDNA filtration techniques: open membrane, Waterra capsule and Sylphium capsule filters, were compared for DNA yield and detection efficiency. SYBR Green quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was performed to quantify S. mansoni eDNA, following in silico and in vitro optimisation of primers. Conventional malacological surveys were conducted in parallel to validate eDNA findings, and statistical analyses examined the influence of environmental factors (turbidity and total dissolved solids (TDS)) on eDNA yield and detection rates.

Results

The SYBR Green S. mansoni qPCR assay had a practical limit of detection (LOD), defined as amplification in >95% of 33 technical replicates, of 100 copies per reaction. The assay amplified in 82% of reactions with 10 DNA copies and 76% with a single copy. The theoretical LOD, determined via amplification probabilities in RStudio, was 83 copies per reaction, which was also the calculated limit of quantification (LOQ). Schistosoma mansoni eDNA was detected in 58.1% (25/43) of filters from Lake Albert and 19.2% (10/52) from Lake Victoria. The Waterra capsule filter yielded the highest eDNA concentrations, while the Sylphium-coupled capsule filter exhibited comparable detection efficiency. Among the DNA purification methods tested, the Sylphium precipitation-based protocol produced significantly higher eDNA yield than column-based kits (DNeasy Blood and Tissue and Zymo Research). Despite significant variation in eDNA recovery across filtration methods, qPCR detection rates were consistent. No significant correlation was observed between turbidity and S. mansoni eDNA detectability.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the potential of eDNA as a sensitive, scalable tool for schistosomiasis surveillance. While Waterra filters and Sylphium extraction maximised DNA yield, lower-yield filtration methods still enabled S. mansoni detection in high-transmission settings. These findings support the adaptability of eDNA approaches across varying resource contexts. Future work should prioritise protocol standardisation, ecological validation, and development of field-ready diagnostics such as LAMP to enable broader implementation in endemic regions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00