Double Staining Immunohistochemistry and Digital Pathology: Moving Towards Standardization of the Proliferative Index Evaluation in Meningiomas
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background: Although several studies showed that high immunohistochemical Ki-67 index negatively influences the clinical course of meningiomas, especially in grade 1 and 2 neoplasm, the 5th edition of the World Health Organi-zation (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System does not recognize it as a prognostic crite-rion. Issues related to Ki-67 assessment include interobserver variability, different cut-off values used by pathologists and the presence of a complex inflammatory tumour microenvironment, that may overestimate the proliferative index (PI). Methods In this paper, we described as Double Staining Immunohistochemistry (dIHC) EMA/Ki-67 highlights only neoplastic meningocytes better tha single slices evcaluation; then the application of Dig-ital Pathology (DP) can provide digital information for a more accurate count. Results and Future prospective dIHC and DP can support and standardize the evaluation of PI in meningiomas in daily routine.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00