Variation in practice of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation: a European survey

Observational OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

A European survey of gynecologists revealed significant variation in the indications and surgical techniques for laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation, with European operators more frequently performing complete transection and at greater distances from cervical insertion.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To examine the variation in current indications and surgical techniques for performing laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in Europe, all consultants on the databases of the UK Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1569) and the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (301) were surveyed. The questionnaire was returned by 719 (38% of 1870) of the gynaecologists contacted and 173 (24%) performed LUNA. Indications for LUNA, which included chronic pelvic pain (68%), dysmenorrhoea (66%), dyspareunia (39%) and endometriosis (60%), were similar across the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe. The European group were more likely to perform LUNA (62% versus 21%), completely transect the uterosacral ligaments (56% versus 36%) and at a distance of more than 2 cm from its cervical insertion (50% versus 21%) than the UK group. There is variation in the surgical techniques of performing LUNA in Europe and the techniques vary according to operator experience.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_painendometriosisdysmenorrheadyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Laparoscopy Ligaments Ligaments Pelvic Pain Practice Patterns, Physicians' Practice Patterns, Physicians' Databases, Factual Databases, Factual Europe Europe Female Female Humans Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Ligaments Ligaments Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:17:10.165071+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:42.299833+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine