Aquaculture facility-specific microbiota shape the zebrafish gut microbiome

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Environmental microbiomes, such as those in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), can play a key role in shaping host-associated microbial communities. In zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) research, these interactions can introduce uncontrolled sources of variation, potentially confounding experimental outcomes across multiple facilities. Despite widespread zebrafish use in microbiome studies, few have characterized the microbial composition of both tank water and fish across multiple independent facilities to evaluate the consequences of environmental microbiome variation on the host microbiome. Results We compared water and zebrafish gut microbiomes across five aquaculture facilities—two in the United States and three in Norway—using a nested sampling design and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in tank water than in fish guts, and beta diversity metrics revealed distinct clustering by sample type, facility, and location. Differences in microbial community composition were significant across facilities, with both water and fish samples exhibiting facility-specific profiles. Similarity Percentage analysis identified taxonomic groups driving these differences, while Fast Expectation-Maximization for Microbial Source Tracking detected measurable contributions of tank water microbiota to zebrafish gut communities. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity values were lowest between fish and water from the same tank and increased with geographic and facility distance, indicating local microbial overlap. Relative abundance patterns and ordination plots further supported distinct and structured microbial assemblages across systems. Conclusions This study demonstrates that zebrafish aquaculture systems harbor unique microbial communities shaped by both environmental and geographic factors, with tank water acting as a potential source of gut-associated microbes. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating environmental microbiome assessments into zebrafish experimental design, particularly for studies focused on host-microbe interactions. Without such consideration, unaccounted variation in environmental microbiota may affect microbiome composition and reduce cross-study reproducibility. Moving forward, standardized reporting of environmental conditions and microbial composition across facilities will be critical for strengthening reproducibility and interpretation in zebrafish microbiome research.
Full text 3,517 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Environmental microbiomes, such as those in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), can play a key role in shaping host-associated microbial communities. In zebrafish (Danio rerio) research, these interactions can introduce uncontrolled sources of variation, potentially confounding experimental outcomes across multiple facilities. Despite widespread zebrafish use in microbiome studies, few have characterized the microbial composition of both tank water and fish across multiple independent facilities to evaluate the consequences of environmental microbiome variation on the host microbiome.

Results

We compared water and zebrafish gut microbiomes across five aquaculture facilities—two in the United States and three in Norway—using a nested sampling design and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in tank water than in fish guts, and beta diversity metrics revealed distinct clustering by sample type, facility, and location. Differences in microbial community composition were significant across facilities, with both water and fish samples exhibiting facility-specific profiles. Similarity Percentage analysis identified taxonomic groups driving these differences, while Fast Expectation-Maximization for Microbial Source Tracking detected measurable contributions of tank water microbiota to zebrafish gut communities. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity values were lowest between fish and water from the same tank and increased with geographic and facility distance, indicating local microbial overlap. Relative abundance patterns and ordination plots further supported distinct and structured microbial assemblages across systems.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that zebrafish aquaculture systems harbor unique microbial communities shaped by both environmental and geographic factors, with tank water acting as a potential source of gut-associated microbes. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating environmental microbiome assessments into zebrafish experimental design, particularly for studies focused on host-microbe interactions. Without such consideration, unaccounted variation in environmental microbiota may affect microbiome composition and reduce cross-study reproducibility. Moving forward, standardized reporting of environmental conditions and microbial composition across facilities will be critical for strengthening reproducibility and interpretation in zebrafish microbiome research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Email addresses of authors: Bakke: ingrid.bakke{at}ntnu.no; Bohannan: bohannan{at}uoregon.edu List of Abbreviations - ASV - Amplicon Sequence Variant; high-resolution DNA sequences used to identify microbial taxa. - BSA - Bovine Serum Albumin; a protein added to PCR reactions to enhance performance. - FEAST - Fast Expectation-Maximization for Microbial Source Tracking; a tool for estimating microbial source contributions. - PCoA - Principal Coordinate Analysis; a method for visualizing differences in microbial communities. - PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction; a technique used to amplify DNA. - PERMANOVA - Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance; a statistical test for group differences based on distance metrics. - RAS - Recirculating Aquaculture System; a closed-loop water filtration system used in aquaculture. - SIMPER - Similarity Percentage Analysis; a method to determine which taxa contribute most to differences between groups.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00