Reassessing Number-Detector Units in Convolutional Neural Networks

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become essential models for predicting neural activity and behavior in visual tasks. However, their ability to capture higher-level cognitive functions, such as numerosity discrimination, remains debated. Numerosity, the ability to perceive and estimate the number of items in a visual scene, is often proposed to rely on specialized number-detector units within CNNs, analogous to number-selective neurons observed in the brain. In this study, we use CORnet, a biologically inspired CNN architecture inspired by the organization of the primate visual system. To address a limitation of classical Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA)—its assumption that all units contribute equally—we apply pruning, a feature selection approach that identifies the units most relevant for explaining behavioral similarity structure. Our results show that number-detector units are not critical for population-level representations of numerosity, challenging their proposed role in previous studies.
Full text 1,181 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become essential models for predicting neural activity and behavior in visual tasks. However, their ability to capture higher-level cognitive functions, such as numerosity discrimination, remains debated. Numerosity, the ability to perceive and estimate the number of items in a visual scene, is often proposed to rely on specialized number-detector units within CNNs, analogous to number-selective neurons observed in the brain. In this study, we use CORnet, a biologically inspired CNN architecture inspired by the organization of the primate visual system. To address a limitation of classical Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA)—its assumption that all units contribute equally—we apply pruning, a feature selection approach that identifies the units most relevant for explaining behavioral similarity structure. Our results show that number-detector units are not critical for population-level representations of numerosity, challenging their proposed role in previous studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* Emails: leminhnhut.truong{at}unitn.it (N. Truong)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00