Background
In Mexico, 17% of women of childbearing age have infertility
problems, which is equivalent to 1.4 million of couples requiring
assisted reproduction techniques, 1,2 from which, 9 to 25% of the
patients may show a low ovarian response defined as a poor obtention
of oocytes after an ovarian stimulation. 3,4 This alteration may be
associated to Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) characterized by
an increase of the Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), and Luteinizing
Hormone (LH), with diminution of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH),
and estrogens, including menstrual modifications before 40 years old
(oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea),5–7 with a prevalence of 1 out of 100
women before 40, and 1 out of 1000 women before 30. The risk varies
depending on the race, from 0.1% in Japanese to 1% in Caucasians,
and 1.4% in Africans and Hispanics.7–9 Diverse POI etiopathogeneses
have been described; i.e. autoimmune diseases, 10 oxidative stress, 11
genetic predisposition, 12 radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in the
treatment of cancer.13–15 This can lead to problems of collection and
maintenance of primordial follicles, in addition to the induction of
follicular atresia, and apoptosis of granulosa cells.16–19 Only 5 to 15%
of these patients are able to have a spontaneous pregnancy.20–22
On the other hand, Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) is
defined as the rupture of ovular membranes before labor begins. They
are classified as
1) Term: after 37 Weeks of Gestation (WG)
2) Preterm: before 37 WG
3) Prolonged: more than 24 hours of rupture (it may be combined
with the previous two)
4) Previable: occurs before 24 WG.
The pathogenesis of PROM is uncertain, but it is thought that is
caused by a physiological weakening of membranes due to a decrease
in the resistance. It is a complication in 3% of pregnancies and causes
a 25-30% of preterm deliveries; therefore, it is considered as the main
cause of prematurity and maternal mortality. Among the risk factors
are PROM in prior pregnancies, genital/intrauterine tract infections,
Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2022;13(5):305‒309. 305
©2022 Di Silvio-López et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the
treatment of poi, and as a support in expectant
management of placental hematomas and premature
rupture of membranes: case report
Volume 13 Issue 5 - 2022
Di Silvio-López Mauricio,1,2,3,6,7 Luján-
Irastorza Jesús Estuardo,1,2 Durand-Montaño
Carlos,1 Hernández-Ramos Roberto,1 Ávila-
Pérez Felipe de Jesús,1 Myslabodski Julio,8
Pariente-Fernández Maruxa,1,2 Paredes-
Núñez María Angélica,1,2 Pacheco-Pineda
Josué Giovani,4 Vargas-Hernández Víctor
Manuel1,5
1Hospital Bité Médica, México
2Clínica Helix, ciudad de México, México
3Hospital MAC Periférico Sur, México
4Instituto de T erapia Celular (ITC), Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
5National Academy of Medicine México, México
6Mexican Academy of Surgery, México
7American College of Surgeons, International Fellow, USA
8Banco de Cordón Umbilical (BCU), México
Correspondence: Luján Irastorza Jesús Estuardo, Managing
Director, Hospital Bité Médica, Clínica Helix, ciudad de México,
México, T el 5521292609, Email
Vargas Hernández Víctor Manuel, Managing Director, Hospital
Bité Médica, National Academy of Medicine México, México, T el
5552179782, Email
Received: September 11, 2022 | Published: October 03, 2022
Abstract
In Mexico, 17% of women of childbearing age have infertility problems, this alteration
may be associated to Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI). On the other hand, Premature
Rupture of Membranes (PROM) is defined as the rupture of ovular membranes before labor
begins.
The application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) has been proposed for the treatment
of POI, placental abruption and PROM.
Objective
Describe a case report of a patient that received MSCs by intravenous injection
as an adjuvant for the treatment of POI, and as an aid to reduce placental hematomas that
appeared during pregnancy, which resulted in PROM (preterm, and previable), and a
preterm baby delivery (alive).
Clinical case presentation: A 30-year-old woman with history of primary infertility of
2 years; Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) of 0.2 ng/mL; laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal
Obstruction (BTO), endometriosis, diagnostic and surgical laparoscopy for myomatosis,
and Factor VII deficiency; as well as 3 IVF, 4 embryo transfers, and 1 IUI unsuccessful.
With confirmed POI diagnosis, the application of several doses at different times of MSCS
is decided, resulting in pregnancy. Sometime later during pregnancy, placental hematomas
and PROM are observed and decided to apply MSCs at different stages of pregnancy,
resulting in the live birth of a baby (29.3 Weeks of Gestation)
Conclusion
The application of multiple doses of MSCs turns more efficient the placental
tissue restoration, allowing hematomas to disappear, and delaying a possible PROM.
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, anti-Müllerian hormone, premature rupture,
placental hematomas
Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal
Case Report
Open Access
Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in expectant
management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report
306
Copyright:
©2022 Silvio-López et al.
Citation: Di Silvio-López M, Luján-Irastorza JE, Durand-Montaño C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in
expectant management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2022;13(5):305‒309.
DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2022.13.00668
hemorrhages, hematomas, cervical anomalies, invasive procedures,
smoking, etc. The management of these patients depends on the fetal
maturity. There are 2 types of management:
1) Labor, it is recommended for full-term pregnant women with 37
or more WG, with no complications
2) The expectant management consisting of hospitalization to
monitor for a period of time the risk of infection, placental
abruption, umbilical cord compression, fetal wellbeing and
labor.23
In the case of POI, there are many situations where the only
option for the patient to get pregnant is to accept egg donation, 24,25
situation that is not well received by some couples, and as there are
no treatment that restores ovarian function, some medical specialists
have been prompted to investigate new treatment alternatives. En
example of this is the direct application of mesenchymal stem cells
(MSCs) via intravenous injection or directly into ovaries. Similarly,
intravenous application of MSCs has been proposed for the treatment
of placental abruption and PROM when they are caused by the
presence of hematomas.26
Because of their high proliferation rate, regeneration, and high
degree of differentiation into different cell types through asymmetric
divisions,27,28 MSCs in recent years have been considered as a new
option to be used in regenerative medicine. MSCs may be obtained
from embryonic and extraembryonic tissue, as well as from adult
organs, some of which are bone marrow, peripheral blood, umbilical
cord, adipose tissue, etc.; in addition, they may be autologous or
from donor (allogenic). Their application in clinical research has
been as a cellular therapy for conditions such as Alzheimer, lateral
amyotrophic sclerosis, Huntington disease, Parkinson disease,
cerebral and myocardial infarctions, medullar damage, immune
disturbances, arthrosis, restoration of ovarian function, reduction
of cerebral hematomas, etc. They release a wide selection of
cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, with anti-apoptotic, anti-
inflammatory, proangiogenic, and immunomodulating characteristics;
additionally, they are an aid in tissular restoration and replacement
of damaged cells, which makes them highly attractive for clinical
application.29–32
The following is a case report of a patient that received MSCs by
intravenous injection as an adjuvant for the treatment of POI, and as
an aid to reduce placental hematomas that appeared during pregnancy,
which resulted in PROM (preterm, and previable), and a preterm baby
delivery (alive).
Case report
A 30-year-old woman with history of primary infertility of 2
years; AMH, 1,9; laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Obstruction (BTO),
endometriosis, diagnostic and surgical laparoscopy for myomatosis,
and Factor VII deficiency; as well as 3 IVF, 4 embryo transfers, and
1 IUI unsuccessful, attended the PRONATAL Clinic because she
wanted to get pregnant; where, after a background check, a Controlled
Ovarian Stimulation (COS) was started with long protocol. It began
the 21st day of the previous cycle with Lucrin, 20 IU/24h for 3 days;
then, 10 IU/24h, and stopping on the first day of menstruation. That
day the application of Merapur, 300IU was started from Day 1
to Day 11, and Choragon, 10000IU on Day 12. Eight MII oocytes
were obtained by follicular aspiration, from which 1 developed into
blastocyst (BH/BB, euploid), and 7 degenerated.
Therefore, the euploid blastocyst was vitrified and it was decided
to accumulate oocytes, which was not possible because the patient
presented a spontaneous pregnancy [Retained Dead Egg (RDE) of
10.3WG], where the loss was attributed to inflammation by increased
immunity as the patient showed an increment of Natural Killers (NK)
cells (12%) in peripheral blood, and Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha
(TNF-α) G308A (heterozygote), TNF-α G238A (homozygote) and
Lymphotoxin-alpha (LT-α) A252G (heterozygote) polymorphism. So,
a treatment was established with Lite vaccination (immunotherapy
with paternal lymphocytes), and Enbrel (treatment for autoimmune
diseases).
Before starting another COS, it was decided to evaluate AMH
again, showing a decrease from 1.9 to 0.2ng/mL, which confirmed
POI diagnosis. Then, it was decided to carry out a COS by DuoStim
at low doses of Pergoveris daily, and the application of MSCs directly
in ovary, and systemically (intravenous injection by the end of the
second stage of DuoStim). The first stage began with Pergoveris daily,
150IU/75IU from Day 3 to Day 9; Cetrotide, 0.25mg/day on Days
8 and 9; and Ovidrel, 250µg on Day 9. Three oocytes (MII) were
obtained, which were fertilized with semen of the partner diagnosed
with Normozoospermia, from which none developed into blastocyst.
The second stage of DuoStim began with Pergoveris daily,
150IU/75IU from Day 15 to Day 21; Cetrotide, 0.25mg/day from
Day 18 to Day 21; and Ovidrel, 250µg on Day 21. The day of
follicular aspiration 4 oocytes were obtained, from which 3 were
MII. These, when fertilized with semen of the partner diagnosed with
normozoospermia, did not developed into viable blastocysts. At the
end of the second stage of DuoStim, after obtaining the last oocyte,
15 million of Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-
MSCs) diluted in 3mL of Hartman’s solution (4mL of total vol.) were
applied directly in ovaries as an adjuvant for the treatment of POI.
Also, 30 million of AD-MSCs diluted in 8 mL of Hartman’s solution
were applied systemically (intravenous injection). A total of 60
million of AD-MSCs were applied, which were kindly provided by
the Cellular Therapy Institute (ITC, Guadalajara, Mexico) (Figure 1).
Figure 1 T echnique; Application of AD-MSCs in the ovary; 1) The aspiration
system is closed to prevent AD-MSCs from going to the oocyte collection
tube; 2) AD-MSCs were injected with the flow of the system directed to the
ovary, and 3) It is observed whether AD-MSCs are deposited in the ovary.
As the effects of MSCs on ovaries may be observed 2 months
after their application; 33 within this waiting period, it was decided
to transfer the embryo (BH/BB, euploid) obtained in the first cycle
carried out in PRONATAL Clinic, which, when devitrified, did not
recover well, starting a state of degeneration and cell death resulting
in the cancellation of the procedure. This situation disappointed
the patients, who decided not to wait for the AD-MSCs to have the
expected effect and decided to carry out a cycle with egg donor, where
Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in expectant
management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report
307
Copyright:
©2022 Silvio-López et al.
Citation: Di Silvio-López M, Luján-Irastorza JE, Durand-Montaño C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in
expectant management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2022;13(5):305‒309.
DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2022.13.00668
22 donor oocytes were fertilized with semen of the husband (mild
teratozoospermia). Five blastocysts were obtained, from which 3 were
vitrified, and 2 were transferred fresh, resulting in a twin pregnancy.
After the patient was able to achieve pregnancy, she had bleeding
throughout the first trimester (spotting every other day) since she
implanted the embryo.
At 9.3 WG, during obstetrical review an RDE of tween B (Figure
2B), and a 4cm-hematoma in the placenta of embryo A (Figure 2A)
were observed; so, it was decided to apply an intravenous injection
of 60 million umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs)
[Kindly provided by the Bank of Umbilical Cord of México (BCU)]
as an adjuvant to reduce the size of the hematoma.
Figure 2 Ultrasound of tween pregnancy (9.3 WG). A) Fetus A (hematoma),
and B) Fetus B (RDE).
After application of UC-MSCs, the hematoma was reduced to:
2.41cm (9.5WG), 1.5cm (9.6WG), and 0.8cm (10, and 10.1WG). At
10.1 WG, 35 million UC-MSCs [Kindly provided by the BCU] were
applied by intravenous injection as a booster, achieving complete
disappearance of the hematoma at 11.5WG (Figure 3).
Figure 3 Ultrasound of singleton pregnancy after RDE of Fetus B, in addition
to the presence of hematoma that was reduced after application of AD-MSCs.
Hematoma size: A) 4 cm (9.3 WG); b) 2.41 cm (9.5 WG), and C) 0.8 cm (10,
and 10.1 WG).
At 16.1 WG, the patient arrives to the emergency room, reporting
active transvaginal bleeding after sexual intercourse. A suitable
implantation was observed by ultrasound; in the upper pole there is an
image of hematomas of 1.5 and 1.2cm. In the same way as in week 9.3,
the application of UC-MSCs [Kindly provided by the BCU] was made
by intravenous injection, as an alternative to reduce hematomas. At
16.3 weeks of gestation, after application of AD-MSCs, hematomas
were reduced to 0.4 cm, and 0.3 cm; at 17.6WG no hematomas are
observed (Figure 4).
Figure 4 Ultrasound of pregnancy; A) 16.1 WG, 2 small hematomas are
observed (1.5 and 1.2 cm), and B) 17.6 WG, with no presence of hematomas.
At 23.2WG, the patient returns to PRONATAL Clinic because
a day before she presented red spotting after sexual intercourse
(no hematomas are observed). At 28.3WG, the patient reports fluid
leakage at night and together with medical history, nitrazine and
crystallography test, confirming PROM, therefore, conservative
management (expectant) is followed, and 60 million UC-MSCs
[Kindly provided by the Bank of Umbilical Cord of México (BCU)]
are applied at 29WG.
After application of UC-MSCs at 29.2WG, the lung maturation
is completed. Patient’s vital signs are stable, amniotic fluid remained
stable, hemodynamic parameters normal, and with no data of maternal
or fetal inflammatory response. For that moment no maternal or fetal
emergency indicated immediate termination of pregnancy; therefore,
it was suggested to continue with the conservative management of
PROM. Finally, at 29.3WG, cesarean section was performed with the
finding of a male birth with 1340g, 41cm, and Apgar 8/9. The child is
currently in the first year of life.
Discussion
Currently, a large number of studies have shown how MSCs help to
reduce the symptoms and alterations observed in different pathologies
through animal models and clinical trials. This, in turn, has allowed the
development of increasingly refined MSCs procurement techniques
with ability to isolate such cells from different tissues. In the case
of POI, studies of MSCs transplantation have demonstrated their
therapeutic potential by restoring ovarian structure and function.34 An
example of this is reported by Luján J. et al.,33 who, in a retrospective
study that included 8 patients with POI, observed that the application
of AD-MSCs increased mean values when the endometrial thickness
(8.6 to 9.4mm), the number of oocytes (2 to 9), and their size (13.5 to
15.5mm) were evaluated on Day 11 of menstrual cycle. This allowed to
obtain a greater number of MII oocytes (2.6 to 4.2) the day of follicular
aspiration, and blastocysts (0 to 3) thereafter.33 Herraiz S. et al.,35 in a
group of 17 patients who were poor responders, observed that after
application of 50 x 106 BM-MSCs in the ovary by catheterization from
Day 2 to Day 43, the number of antral follicles was increased (3 vs 8).
Luján J. et al.,2 in a case report of a woman (39 years old) diagnosed
with POI, reported that the application of AD-MSCs (intra-ovarian)
increased the mean number of MII oocytes obtained (3 to 14); also,
Herraiz S. et al.,36 reported an increase of the number of MII obtained
(15 vs 30) in immunodeficient mice with ovarian damage induced by
chemotherapy, after the application of BM-MSCs; and Li J. et al., 37
in a group of female mice with POI induced by cyclophosphamide,
showed an increased number of follicles (11 vs 13) after 6 weeks
of application of MSCs from chorionic plate. Unfortunately, in the
present work the patients decided not to wait the 2 months indicated in
studies before the effects of the application of AD-MSCs can be seen,
accepting egg donation.
On the other hand, in this report the patient developed placental
hematomas twice after achieving pregnancy by egg donation. The
first one at 9.3 weeks of gestation, that was reduced and disappeared
approximately at 11.5WG, after application of UC-MSCs. Similarly,
at 16.1WG, two hematomas were observed (1.5, and 1.2cm), which
also reduced their size and disappeared at 17.6 WG, after application
of UC-MSCs. In addition, PROM was present at 28.3WG, and the
patient was kept under PROM expectant management. Immediate
application of UC-MSCs was carried out, which probably allowed
to delay delivery up to the 29.3 WOG, and to complete the lung
maturation. Similarly, in a case report by Luján J. et al., 2020, a
retro placental hematoma was observed at 25 weeks of gestation
(2.8x2.1x0.6cm), which, after 3 applications of AD-MSCs (1st: 25
Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in expectant
management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report
308
Copyright:
©2022 Silvio-López et al.
Citation: Di Silvio-López M, Luján-Irastorza JE, Durand-Montaño C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in
expectant management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2022;13(5):305‒309.
DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2022.13.00668
WOG, 2nd: 26.5 WOG, and 3rd: 27.4WG) was reduced, confirming
repair of placental abruption at 28.2 WOG, and resulting in live
birth of newborn at 30.1 WOG. This could be due to the fact that the
application of MSCs improves the microenvironment surrounding the
damaged tissue (hematoma), thus stimulating the generation of new
blood vessels, regulating the immune response and preventing cell
death by apoptosis, by producing cytokines and growth factors that
regulate these processes, in addition to replacing the damaged tissue
with new tissue by differentiating.38–41
Finally, there are very few reports of MSCs application in humans,
and the mechanisms proposed about how they function have been
developed through studies on laboratory animals, which make these
procedures an area of opportunity in clinical practice for the study
of diverse pathologies such as POI, and PROM, areas in which it
is necessary to carry out randomized, controlled trials with large
samples.
Conclusion
MSCs transplant studies have demonstrated their therapeutical
potential for restoration of ovarian structure and function.
Unfortunately, in this work the patients’ decision to accept egg
donation after Application of AD-MSCs, prevented us from seeing
the potential benefits of AD-MSCs as an adjuvant for the treatment
of POI.
The application of multiple doses of UC-MSCs (by intravenous
injection) turns more efficient the placental tissue restoration, allowing
hematomas to disappear, and delaying a possible PROM. This makes
it possible to finalize, as in this case, the lung maturation.
Finally, conservative treatment for placental hematomas and
PROM is currently limited, and there is no complementary therapy
beyond maternal and fetal surveillance. Therefore, we suggest the
development of a protocol for the application of MSCs in PROM, to
confirm reproducibility of research findings and to be able to establish
this measure as a standard therapeutic option.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
None.
Conflicts of interest
Author declares there is no conflict of interest exists.
References
1. Corona T, Halabe J, Vázquez G. Academia Nacional de Medicina de
México. 2019.
2. Lujan J, Guerrero J, Kava B, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell
therapy in patients with unexplainable low ovarian response: first case
in Mexico. Journal of Medical & Advanced Clinical Case Reports .
2020;2(1):1–4.
3. Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, et al. Adjuvant growth
hormone therapy in antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing
assisted reproductive technology. Archives of Gynecology and
Obstetrics. 2013;287(5):1017–1021.
4. Eftekhar M, Sadat E, Tabibnejad N. Outcome of reproductive
technology in different subgroups of poor ovarian responder fulfilling
the POSEIDON Criterian, Middle East. Fertility Society Journal .
2018;23(4):399–403.
5. Santoro N. Mechanisms of premature ovarian failure. Ann Endocrinol
(Paris). 2003;64(2):89–92.
6. Timmreck L, Reindollar R. Contemporary issues in primary amenorrhea.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003;30(2):287–302.
7. Beck P, Persani L. Premature ovarian failure. Orphanet J Rare Dis .
2006;1(9):1–5.
8. Kumar N, Manesh I. Premature ovarian insufficiency atiology and long–
term consequences. Women’ s Health. 2017;3(2):45–58.
9. Luborsky J, Meyer P, Sowers M, et al. Premature menopause in a
multi–ethnic population study of the menopause transition. Human
Reproduction. 2003;18(1):199–206.
10. Warren B, Kinsey W, Mcginnis L, et al. Ovarian autoimmune disease:
clinical concepts and animal models. Cellular & Molecular Immunology.
2004;11:510–521.
11. Kumar M, Pathak D, Venkatesh S, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities &
oxidative stress in women with premature ovarian failure (POF). Indian
J Med Res. 2012;135:92–97.
12. Huang W, Cao Y , Shi L. Effects of FSHR polymorphisms onpremature
ovarian insufficiency in humanbeings: a meta–analysis. Reproductive
Biology and Endocrinology. 2019;17(80):1–6.
13. Cho H, Lee S, Min K, et al. Advances in the treatment and prevention of
chemotherapy–induced ovarian toxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7792.
14. Buigues A, Marchante M, Herraiz S, et al. Diminished ovarian
reserve chemotherapy–induced mouse model:a tool for the preclinical
assessmentof new therapies for ovarian damage. Reprod Sci. 2019:1–11.
15. Iwase A, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, et al. Assessment of ovarian reserve
using anti–Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecologic conditions
and surgical interventions: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Biol
Endocrinol. 2014;12(125):1–8.
16. Persani L, Rossetti R, Cacciatore C. Genes involved in human premature
ovarian failure. J Mol Endocrinol. 2010;45(5):257–279.
17. Welt C. Primary ovarian insufficiency: a more accurate term for
premature. Clinical Endocrinology (OXFORD). 2008;68(4):499–508.
18. Kodaman P. Early menopause: primary ovarian insufficiency and surgical
menopause. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2010;28(5):360–369.
19. Torrealday S, Kodaman P, Pal L. Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
– an update on recent advances in understanding and management.
F1000Res. 2017;6:1–15.
20. Baber R, Panay N, Fenton A. IMS Recommendations on women’s
midlife health and menopause hormone therapy. Climacteric.
2016;19(2):109–150.
21. Cox L, Liu J. Primary ovarian insufficiency: an update. Int J Womens
Health. 2014;6:235–243.
22. Dragojević S, Vasiljević M, Jovanović A, et al. Premature ovarian
insufficiency – novel hormonalapproaches in optimizing fertility.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;36(2):1–4.
23. Orias M. Premature Rupture of Membranes. Revista Médica Sinergia .
2020;11(e606):5.
24. Obinchemti T, Youta C, Bebey B, et al. Successful pregnancy with
donor eggs in–vitro fertilization after premature ovarian insufficiency
in a tertiary hospital in a low–income setting: a case report. Fertil Res
Pract. 2016;2(12):1–6.
25. Chae J, Gavrilova L. Premature ovarian insufficiency: procreative
management and preventive strategies. Biomedicines. 2018;7(2):1–10.
26. Lujan J, Durand C, Hernandez R, et al. Endovenous application of
alogenic AD–MSCs as therapy for abruptio placentae: a case report.
Global Research in Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020;2(2):12–15.
Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in expectant
management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report
309
Copyright:
©2022 Silvio-López et al.
Citation: Di Silvio-López M, Luján-Irastorza JE, Durand-Montaño C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as an adjuvant for the treatment of poi, and as a support in
expectant management of placental hematomas and premature rupture of membranes: case report. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2022;13(5):305‒309.
DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2022.13.00668
27. Frese L, Dijkman P, Hoerstrup S. Adipose tissue–derived stem cells in
regenerative medicine. Transfus Med Hemother. 2016;43(4):268–274.
28. Tsuji W, Rubin J, Marra K. Adipose–derived stem cells: Implications in
tissue regeneration. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6(3):312–321.
29. Elfayomy A, Almasry S, El–Tarhouny S, et al. Human umbilical cord
blood–mesenchymal stem cells transplantation renovates the ovarian
surface epithelium in a rat model of premature ovarian failure: possible
direct and indirect effects. Tissue Cell. 2016;48:1–13.
30. Ghadami M, El–Demerdash E, Zhang E, et al. Bone marrow
transplantation restore follicular maturation and steroid hormones
production in a mouse model for primary ovarian failure. PLoS One .
2012;7:e36462.
31. Shammaa R, El–Hakim A, Abusarah J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells
beyond. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020;8(72):1–17.
32. Afflerbach A, Kiri M, Detinis T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as
a promising cell source for integration in novel in vitro models.
Biomolecules. 2020;10(1306):1–30.
33. Luján J, Durand C, Hernández R, et al. Therapeutic potential of
autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells in human poi and
ovarian aging. Journal of Evolving Stem Cell Research. 2021;1(3):5–18.
34. Fazeli Z, Abedindo A, Davood M, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells
(MSCs) therapy for recovery of fertility: a systematic review. Stem Cell
Rev Rep. 2017;14(1):1–12.
35. Herraiz S, Romeu M, Buigues A. Autologous stem cell ovarian
transplantation to increase reproductive potential in patients who are
poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2018;10(3):496–505.
36. Herraiz S, Buigues A, Diaz C. Fertility rescue and ovarian follicle
growth promotion by bone marrow stem cell infusion. Fertility and
Sterility. 2018;109(5):908–918.
37. Li J, Yu Q, Huang H, et al. Human chorionic plate–derivedmesenchymal
stem cells transplantationrestores ovarian function in achemotherapy–
induced mouse model ofpremature ovarian failure. Stem Cell Res Ther.
2018;9(81):1–9.
38. Rudolf A, Hendrik M. Immunomodulation by Mesenchymal Stem Cells
(MSCs): mechanisms of action of living, apoptotic, and dead MSCs.
Front Immunol. 2019;10(1191):1–10.
39. Maacha S, Sidahmed H, Jacob S, Gentilcore G, et al. Paracrine
mechanisms of mesenchymal stromal cells in angiogenesis. Stem Cells
Int. 2020:1–20.
40. Guiducc S, Porta F, Saccardi R, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem
cells foster revascularization ofischemic limbs in systemic sclerosis. Ann
Intern Med. 2010;153(10):650–654.
41. Lian B, Chen J, Li T, et al. Clinical remission of a critically ill COVID–
19patient treated by human umbilical cordmesenchymal stem cells.
Medicine. 2020;99(31):1–6.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.